It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Evanzsayz
evc1shop
Evanzsayz
windword
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Funny, having an abortion is "avoiding taking responsibility" and yet abandoning the very saem child to the system is way more acceptable.
Agreed. And, women aren't cattle, to be forced to give birth to feed the adoption business with newborns to sell for profit!
You guys are seriously that illiterate? Doesn't matter what happens after the adoption, atleast the child will be alive.
I have seen some fine writing skills on this thread, and as for reading skills, I am sure none of the posters here are illiterate or they would not have been able to read, comprehend and form opinions of the previous posts on the current subject matter. Did you post this in the wrong thread?edit on 11-10-2013 by evc1shop because: clarity
Try to derail the thread all you want buddy. Just shows you have nothing to contribute other then little kiddy comments.
Evanzsayz
reply to post by Grimpachi
Hey guess what here's an idea to her and all the females in existence. Give birth then give it up for adoption, atleast then the child will live and you can still go out and party and be a slut and whatnot. I doubt most of you people even know what it means to die and what it means to people to be lucky enough to be alive. People take everything for granted, especially LIFE I mean damn look at you, you guys kill your own babies.
Pardon?
If this is upheld (and given the girl is quite far gone now the verdict seems moot), would it be unjust for the Supreme Court to legally obligate the judge to adopt the child at least until it turns 18?
Maybe the judge knows best but besides his yay or nay, he will not be a part of this girls life and I doubt he will follow up on this baby he forced her to carry 20 years from now
thesaneone
reply to post by Grimpachi
Responsibility also means to keep your legs closed until you are old enough to understand the consequences of your actions.
thesaneone
reply to post by Grimpachi
Sorry no belief system here but nice try.
This is about responsibility and thinking before acting.
thesaneone
reply to post by Grimpachi
I just gave you my answer scroll up and read.
Asking me the same question over again when you know my answer can only mean that you have no argument left other then your for ending a living being.
Pardon?
If this is upheld (and given the girl is quite far gone now the verdict seems moot), would it be unjust for the Supreme Court to legally obligate the judge to adopt the child at least until it turns 18?
Evanzsayz
reply to post by Grimpachi
Hey guess what here's an idea to her and all the females in existence. Give birth then give it up for adoption, atleast then the child will live and you can still go out and party and be a slut and whatnot. I doubt most of you people even know what it means to die and what it means to people to be lucky enough to be alive. People take everything for granted, especially LIFE I mean damn look at you, you guys kill your own babies.
thesaneone
reply to post by iwilliam
So lets kill a life instead of giving it a chance thru adoption? Makes a lot of sense to me.
And I'm the one who is insensitive?
thesaneone
reply to post by iwilliam
So lets kill a life instead of giving it a chance thru adoption? Makes a lot of sense to me.
And I'm the one who is insensitive?
You people are truly sick but just keep scraping those "mistakes" one life at a time.
the misfortune of my irresponsibility.............
LurkingRelentlessly
"the misfortune of my irresponsibility should be pardoned because the consequences impact the potential quality of my life"
that seems to be the summery of what im reading here.
wow...the implications if this were applied to other situations.
ill let your imaginations do the work.