It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
greencmp
reply to post by Indigo5
I think the left and the right (that's right, the Republicans hate the constitution too) are going to have to revise their strategy of blaming everything on 'The Tea Party'.
The fact is that 'The American People' have had enough.edit on 8-10-2013 by greencmp because: (no reason given)
solomons path
greencmp
reply to post by Indigo5
These tactics are as old as Adam, yet the brain-dead American populace can't see through it and the party cheerleaders are more than happy to engage in the same.
Sad . . .edit on 10/8/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)
HEY! We're not brain d...Oooo, LOOK!...A SQUIRREL!!!edit on 8-10-2013 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)
neo96
The current potus, and his party loves selling WE THE PEOPLE out to insurance CORPORATIONS.
greencmp
reply to post by Indigo5
I think the left and the right (that's right, the Republicans hate the constitution too) are going to have to revise their strategy of blaming everything on 'The Tea Party'.
The fact is that 'The American People' have had enough.edit on 8-10-2013 by greencmp because: (no reason given)
Only 22 percent of respondents describe themselves as supporters of the tea party in Gallup's latest poll - a number that nearly matches the record low 21 percent of Americans who described themselves as tea party supporters in a similar poll at the end of 2011. By contrast, toward the end of 2010, 32 percent of Americans described themselves as supporters of the tea party.
Indigo5
If Pres. Obama acted like the Tea Party…
Checks and Balances..
Okay…So the Affordable Care Act aka “Obamacare” was…
Legislative
Debated for over a year..
Voted on and passed by the people’s elected representatives in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Executive
Signed into law by the President of the United States
A President who ran for and was elected TWICE, once with ACA as a proposal and the 2nd time after the law was passed, both with the ACA/Obamacare as central pillar of his platform.
Judicial
The law was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Now…a minority faction of the GOP aka “Tea Party Caucus” of roughly 40 members amongst the 435 members of one chamber (House of Representatives) of the legislative branch, is for the first time in our nation’s history threatening our nation with defaulting on it’s debts...
...something every economist, CEO and investor agrees would lead at the least to a 2nd recession and with a strong possibility of a depression…unless a democratically enacted law, passed and upheld by all three branches of government is scuttled or repealed.
All the while, that minority faction (TP) threatens the House Leader with insurrection and he abides, refusing to bring a clean bill to a vote, despite having a GOP Majority in the house, because even despite that majority, if he allowed the House of Representatives to vote openly, they would vote against this tactic.
The insane retort that Tea Party advocates offer to sane observers who accurately accuse them of taking the American economy hostage until the demands of an extremist minority faction is met and the people’s will is undone…is…It’s just the “checks and balances” of democracy at work. Despite not even allowing an actual vote on a clean debt ceiling raise or spending resolution.
What if in that context, the President refused to sign and threatened to VETO any Debt Ceiling raise that did not include a provision for Single Payer, Government Funded Healthcare??
Over-riding that Veto would require 2/3rds majority vote in both the House and the Senate…while the House GOP Majority would certainly bring the bill to the floor and might even cajole enough Democrats to over-ride the Veto…the Senate Leadership being in the hands of Democrats could refuse to bring the bill to a vote until the House acquiesced and agreed to single payer healthcare, all the while, the American Economy on the line.
Interesting hypothetical…and interested in opinions from both sides of the spectrum
Would that tactic simply be "checks and balances"...or would it be taking the American People's future hostage until a minorities Tyrannical demands are met?
The law was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that African Americans, whether slave or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. Dred Scott, an African American slave who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In a 7–2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the Court denied Scott's request and in doing so, ruled an Act of Congress to be unconstitutional for the second time in its history.[
The law was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States.
“What you cannot do, what cannot be allowed to stand is the notion that a group of legislators that cannot convince a majority in both Houses and the President to agree with them, would then shut down the government or threaten default until they got their way. That is not democracy, that is extortion.”
kozmo
US Adults Are Dumber Than Average Humans
The above link explains how Obama was elected - TWICE. And summarizes how and why this president still has supporters!