It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

[HOAX]UFOs sightings to come in october 2013 over LONDON.[HOAX]

page: 64
22
<< 61  62  63    65  66  67 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:10 AM
link   

tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Olivet
 





Why are you inventing things? Where did you see me moving the goalposts? Are you a disinfo agent?


And what am I inventing?

How about the christening of baby George and the aliens?

Goalposts moved.


Instead of inventing things, you'd better show to the readers the posts where I am supposed to have moved goalposts. Unless you don't understand what 'moving goalposts' means.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 





Oh my gosh! You're very late Tsurfer2000h. All of this has already been lenghtly addressed, in this thread and the other one. The ironskeptic link is BS. My real name is Eric Julien. Jean Ederman is a PSEUDO I used to convey the ET World Message not to make any advertisment for my works.



And so are your predictions, well I guess we now know at least your not Mr.Bernie but from what it looks like your not much more credible.

Why is the ironskeptic link BS, is it because you have been exposed and now you have to come up with more BS to cover this story?



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:22 AM
link   

Olivet
Éric Julien in the CIA sponsored Replication Alien Machine Project


So your "source" for the claim you worked for the CIA on alien technology is...... your own blog!

I have flown to the moon, and my source is
www.abovetopsecret.com...

So that means my claim must be trye!

edit on 26-10-2013 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:22 AM
link   
It is rather obvious by now he made the thread to promote himself. Even a disreputable hoaxer can make a name and sell stuff, let the thread die.
BTW Julien, spamming the thread within minutes of someone replying is a sure sign of an attention seeking post, look at all of the other ridiculous claim posts and you see the pattern.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 





Instead of inventing things, you'd better show to the readers the posts where I am supposed to have moved goalposts. Unless you don't understand what 'moving goalposts' means.


Obviously you don't.

I did show it, your just to deluded to understand it.

Again the christening of George and the aliens being there, and when they weren't you were called out on it then you moved the goalposts when that didn't happen.

Now how about that 2012 prediction you said data was missing is why it didn't happen, guess what you did there...Moved the Goalposts

Just as your doing with this prediction.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:26 AM
link   

Lumpy79
It is rather obvious by now he made the thread to promote himself. Even a disreputable hoaxer can make a name and sell stuff, let the thread die.
BTW Julien, spamming the thread within minutes of someone replying is a sure sign of an attention seeking post, look at all of the other ridiculous claim posts and you see the pattern.

What I was trying to say on page 62!
Stop feeding the ego.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Mufcutcakeyumyum
 





What I was trying to say on page 62!
Stop feeding the ego.


I think those of us who know this is tripe are sticking around to see where this finally ends up.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 05:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 





They have already disabled nuclear weapons as a proof of their fear / anger against them. They sent more than once a message to the humans, especially the military and political personels. They don't want nuclear weapons on Earth for reasons I already lengthly explained.


Okay you said the earthlings are a threat to ET because of our nuclear weapons, and now your saying they have already disabled nuclear weapons...



The human beings are a threat to the ETs with their nuclear weapons.


Now which is it are we a threat or not because you are contradicting yourself here.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:37 AM
link   

tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Olivet
 





You can think whatever you see fit. I really don't care. FACTS WILL SPEAK THE TRUTH.


If you don't care why are you so determined to make others believe this so called event?

Yes the facts will speak the truth, but there is one problem...


There is a difference between warning / informing / correcting disinfos...and being interested by the people's beliefs.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:40 AM
link   

tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Olivet
 





PLEASE, PLEASE dont get suckered into HomerinNC's lies and disinfos. This is all crap.


Why, you want us to believe yours?

Yes it is....


I don't want you, and the readers, to believe me at all, but to be warned and informed.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:41 AM
link   

Flaunt
Michel Carmassi? Sorry, praise from another crackpot doesn't count and it certainly doesn't make your work any more credible.


Why a physicist wouldn't be credible?



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:43 AM
link   

boymonkey74
reply to post by NoRulesAllowed
 


The Fearmonger Who Cried Wolf....
Just had a read about him and many also think he is a crackpot and a faker.
I guess we will see at the end of the month....I just hope the guy holds his hands up when wrong and doesn't move the goal posts.
edit on 26-10-2013 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)


Ironskeptics often means ironliars. It's in the title! There are skeptics. Therefore, they MUST follow a fanatical skeptical line whatever the lies it would mean to 'prove' they are 'right'. There is nothing balanced in the word 'skeptic', especially when you add the word 'iron' to it.
edit on 26-10-2013 by Olivet because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 





There is a difference between warning / informing / correcting disinfos...and being interested by the people's beliefs.


And yet this thread shows none of that.

Plus it is only about one persons interest and that would be yours.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 





Ironskeptics often means ironliars. It's in the title! There are skeptics. Therefore, they MUST follow a skeptical line whatever the lies it would mean to 'prove' they are right.


Well then prove them wrong.

This should be interesting as you don't have such a good track record trying to prove things lately.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:47 AM
link   

tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Olivet
 





There is a difference between warning / informing / correcting disinfos...and being interested by the people's beliefs.


And yet this thread shows none of that.

Plus it is only about one persons interest and that would be yours.


You forget:

1) the evidences to come about the October London UFOs sightings,
2) the rescue part of the future.

That makes many people involved.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:51 AM
link   

Olivet

boymonkey74
reply to post by Olivet
 





2) I have written a scientific book about the UFOs with praises from physicists.

3) I have been recruited to work for a CIA sponsored Replication Alien Machine Project.


What book? and proof please...I think you are just talking BS.



I thought you weren't a newbee here.

Éric Julien in the CIA sponsored Replication Alien Machine Project

GORDON NOVEL ASKED ERIC JULIEN TO PARTICIPATE TO THE CIA SPONSORED REPLICATION ALIEN MACHINE PROJECT

CIA Sponsored Replication Alien Machine Project Briefing, by Éric Julien

The Science of Extraterrestrials

UFO EXPLAINED AT LAST, by Éric Julien

THE SCIENCE OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS, by Éric Julien

PRESS RELEASE OF THE SCIENCE OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS

SUMMARY OF THE SCIENCE OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS

PREFACE: THE SCIENCE OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS, by Michael Salla

THE SCIENCE OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS LONG REVIEW

Few reviews among many others:


“If the hypothesis, fascinating I must admit, of Eric Julien is verified directly or indirectly, so yes, that would explain all the paranormal, I indeed say all the SUPERNATURAL, more exactly all the NATURAL NOT ALREADY EXPLAINED, and one must give to him the Nobel prize of physics”. Michel Carmassi (Phd) French Physicist



“The demonstration is convincing! … I find the whole very well structured and interesting; as for the innovative aspect, not to worry.” Michel Actis, Doctor in Physics, France.



“I am happy to be useful to you. Your views on the phenomenon of time are very interesting to my colleagues and myself.” Alexander Levich, Physicist, President of the Institute of Time Nature Exploration, Russia.



“My opinion of this book is that it is highly coherent. …

It is okay that it is coherent, but it is not enough that the pieces all agree among themselves: do they agree with the reality of things? That is where it becomes interesting. In fact, its field of investigation ranges from the microscopic (a study of matter at the fundamental level, the internal structure of the wave of matter, the structure of the electron and of light, the structure of space and of time, fundamental forces, energy, heat, and so on) to the macroscopic (a study of the formation of the galaxies, of gravitation at the universal scale, of missing mass, and so on); giving explanations that are plausible, coherent, and in accordance with the observations that quantum physics and astrophysics have been able to provide but not to explain. …

In this sense, it lays the foundations of a new physics with a vision that is unifying and finally fundamentally simple (although abstract), meanwhile paying homage to the labors of those whose ideas have served him in the effort to make explicit, in scientific language, what he had in mind (Ari Letho, Jean-Pierre Garnier-Malet, and so on). …

It becomes clear that his theory goes much further than what already exists, and that it is innovative. … The coherence includes paranormal effects (psychic abilities, telepathy, displacement in the spiritual body, memory of dreams, and so on) and explanations relative to the effects of UFOs (displacement of the ships, various visual effects, missing time, creation of crop circles, radiant impacts on nature, and so on). There it become a theory of the super-all, but one that does not need all kinds of lumps to succeed in unifying the various elements: all is based on one unique concept.

It's probably one of the best books ever published in ufology from a scientific point of view.”
Pascal di Scala, Professor of Mathematics, France.



Having had scientific training (Centrale School Engineer Paris), I found in the book of Eric Julien a well argued development in favor of his absolute Relativity. This new approach, which upsets our usual concepts, seems me to propose solid answers to currently unsolved scientific problems. And, more important in my eyes still, absolute Relativity brings something essential for the comprehension of the spiritual world. I thus can only highly recommend the reading of this book to any person eager to understand who we are. Philippe Pellaumail 44800 Saint-Herblain, France.



“Eric Julien has worked much to assimilate the laws of physics in their latest development: limited and generalized relativity, quantum mechanics, cosmology. He uses his knowledge of these domains to draw up a theory that would explain the existence of extraterrestrials and how they would reach us, even living so far from us on the universal scale. …

This book is very clever, and being scientifically trained, I would have to study it closely to detect possible tricks. In any case this book is a scientific mine. Competent physicists would need to give their opinions on the method and the results. I am pleased to signal the enormous scientific work behind and the certain interest in this book beyond the polemics that it may engender here and there. … This book deserves to be read for the scientific knowledge that it provides. …”
Alain Pelosato, Editor in Chief of Science-Fiction Magazine.



It is huge, it s like a Copernicus revolution just like the one in every millennium in sciences. This may be the most important book ever published on UFOs. I am still suspicious of theories-that-explain-it-all, but this book blew me away and I am bluffed. Michel Picard, author of Les OVNIs, laboratoire du futur (UFOs, Laboratory of Future)


Sorry, but this is the equivalent of asking someone who believes in God to prove it without referring to the bible. And with regard to your other comment, just because someone is a 'physicist' with a 'PHD' it doesn't make their claims or support any more credible than yours.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 





Ironskeptics often means ironliars. It's in the title! There are skeptics. Therefore, they MUST follow a fanatical skeptical line whatever the lies it would mean to 'prove' they are 'right'.


Just as you have lied and said Eric Julien has praised your books when in fact you are one in the same, so you are intentionally misleading people to try and save credibility for this story.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Mufcutcakeyumyum
 


When the OP doesn't reply to the posters, he is avoiding to face the truth.

When the OP replies to all the questions or remarks, he is self-promoting his works.

Some people are never happy.

BTW, why are you still here to put this thread at the top of the threads list of this forum while responding to it? Just leave and ignore it. You're an adult, right?

In addition, since I won't come back after my departure with the ETs, I won't be able to make any synopsis after the event in this thread. I therefore post as long as I can to clarify things when necessary. Even this is not sufficient since some people are coming back with the lies and disinfos found on the Net about me.
edit on 26-10-2013 by Olivet because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 





You forget:

1) the evidences to come about the October London UFOs sightings,
2) the rescue part of the future.

That makes many people involved.


Only in your mind this is happening.



posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 06:56 AM
link   

NoRulesAllowed

boymonkey74
reply to post by NoRulesAllowed
 


The Fearmonger Who Cried Wolf....
Just had a read about him and many also think he is a crackpot and a faker.
I guess we will see at the end of the month....I just hope the guy holds his hands up when wrong and doesn't move the goal posts.
edit on 26-10-2013 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)


Well just saying he DID write some books. Even crackpots can write books


It doesn't mean every book writer is a crakpot.



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 61  62  63    65  66  67 >>

log in

join