It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

[HOAX]UFOs sightings to come in october 2013 over LONDON.[HOAX]

page: 17
22
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:11 AM
link   

Chamberf=6


On the 5th of October 2013 at 12:11 pm
reply to post by Olivet
 


That means it was 11 minutes after noon hour on the 5th not the fourth as you keep saying it occurred just in order to make it "fit" with your prediction.That also means in the USA it would also have occurred on the 5th not the 4th as you have said.


edit on 10/11/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)


As far as I know, the witness didn't mention day or night. I saw sometimes 12PM being midnight.

As far as I know, there are 12 hours between London and Hawaii, still in the USA.

At last, the young royals moving occured on October 4th. The UFO above KP could be a check of this moving into KP.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:14 AM
link   

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet
 




In addition, I spent money, time and energy in 2006 to avoid a doom with the Conditional Tsunami Alert which ended happily.

So you are responsible in saving the world from a catastrophe. Really??

Looks from here that you were just plain wrong.


I didn't save the world. ETs did it. Next time will be another story. I showed I wasn't wrong. You use your 1) imagination or 2) your closed mind - your choice - too much.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:16 AM
link   

ThePeaceMaker

Also another question why wasn't there all this UFO/ alien flap when Diana gave birth to wills and Harry


In regards to your question... I honestly believe that the internet is the reason.

Back before the 90's the internet wasn't used as much as it is now. The world only realized the capabilities of internet late 90's and 2000 onwards.

Since then, no subject is 'off limits' anymore. Anything u wanna know you can google or even better ATS lol



FACT: Internet has made the world much, much smaller! Anything that happens is felt everywhere instantaneously.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 


so the approximation means it could be ANYWHERE in london? couldnt the approximation also mean alot narrower radius than that?
in any case, you are just guessing that the ufo flew over Kensington Palace, yet you claim it as truth and proof to substantiate your predictions.

edit on 11-10-2013 by exiteternity because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:18 AM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 




As far as I know, the witness didn't mention day or night. I saw sometimes 12PM being midnight.

You quoted it from the sole witness in a post of yours just above...



Coincidence #4:
The witness saw the UFO around midnight on October 5th, i.e. October 4th in US hour.
On the 5th of October 2013 at 12:11 pm I was having a coffee while looking out of my apartement window on the 8th floor to the horizon. Suddenly I noticed a black object...

It happens that... I said: NOW WAIT FOR OCTOBER 4TH, 2013!

www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 10/11/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:19 AM
link   

ThePawnsTheory
I've read everything the OP has posted and I can't help but wonder why this thread is still up. This person has made ludicrous claims before (as stated around a billion times already). This thread does nothing for us or this site. I say we just ignore him. If by some miraculous chain of events he is right you can tell him you're sorry afterwards but I wouldn't worry about that coming to fruition. There are plenty of other great threads on this site to spend your time and brain-power on. With that said, I am done with this thread and the OP's posts from here on out.


This thread is still up because October 2013 isn't finished yet.

You're making ludicrous statements for my previous predictions were right, except in 2012 when there were missing data. About the thread, don't talk for every reader. You're just one of them.

Ignore me as you wish and do something else. Unless you want to apologize when the time has come.

Meanwhile, go read the other great threads on this site. I don't care.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:21 AM
link   

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet
 




As far as I know, the witness didn't mention day or night. I saw sometimes 12PM being midnight.

You quoted it from the sole witness in a post of yours just above...


Yes, and we don't know what he meant (day or night).



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:24 AM
link   

combatmaster

ThePeaceMaker

Also another question why wasn't there all this UFO/ alien flap when Diana gave birth to wills and Harry


In regards to your question... I honestly believe that the internet is the reason.

Back before the 90's the internet wasn't used as much as it is now. The world only realized the capabilities of internet late 90's and 2000 onwards.

Since then, no subject is 'off limits' anymore. Anything u wanna know you can google or even better ATS lol



FACT: Internet has made the world much, much smaller! Anything that happens is felt everywhere instantaneously.


CombatMaster .. Very good point, I am about the same age as prince Harry. I suppose I was the first generation of youngsters born at the beginning of the internet so it's been around ever since I've grown up (give or take a few years).
Google? Pfft I'd rather ATS it lol



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Olivet

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet
 




As far as I know, the witness didn't mention day or night. I saw sometimes 12PM being midnight.

You quoted it from the sole witness in a post of yours just above...


Yes, and we don't know what he meant (day or night).


The very fact that he said 12:11 PM on the 5th says that. If it was at night it would be 12:11AM on the 5th.

Doesn't your "private intel" educate on how to tell time??
edit on 10/11/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:10 PM
link   

Baddogma
Even IF this is based on something other than humor, freetime and/or bad brain chemicals, the record for alien intelligence of any sort keeping to a prediction is...let's see... nil, nada, nuthin and zip.

I even think other intelligences exist... but for whatever reasons, they aren't reliable predictors of anything.

I'll happily eat my typed words should I ever be proven wrong about these predictions. But I predict my diet will remain Times Roman (or any other font) free.


You talked about the predictions from ETs not being reliable. Few posts above, I explained why it's difficult to understand them (their telepathic language made of symbols and real events mixed + ETs don't trust humans unless they showed they are trustworthy to receive clear messages from them). The bad predictions coming from ETs are therefore the bad interpretations of the humans. It then means that most of the new age channelings are BS.
edit on 11-10-2013 by Olivet because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:14 PM
link   

Chamberf=6

Olivet

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet
 




As far as I know, the witness didn't mention day or night. I saw sometimes 12PM being midnight.

You quoted it from the sole witness in a post of yours just above...


Yes, and we don't know what he meant (day or night).


The very fact that he said 12:11 PM on the 5th says that. If it was at night it would be 12:11AM on the 5th.

Doesn't your "private intel" educate on how to tell time??
edit on 10/11/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)


Reread my previous answer to you.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:22 PM
link   

exiteternity
reply to post by Olivet
 


so the approximation means it could be ANYWHERE in london? couldnt the approximation also mean alot narrower radius than that?
in any case, you are just guessing that the ufo flew over Kensington Palace, yet you claim it as truth and proof to substantiate your predictions.

edit on 11-10-2013 by exiteternity because: (no reason given)


The MUFON locates the city of London as a whole not to cause problems to the witness. But the witness brings us few details that help us to locate him more accurately, i.e. very close to a big airport. The ONLY big airport close to London 'intramuros' is Heathrow, in the West of London.

I didn't say it's a proof. I said it's a coincidence. A WEIRD COINCIDENCE, INDEED! Like every 'coincidence' some people opposed me. The readers can do whatever they want with this analysis. The point is that I have more arguments to believe that I am right, than you have arguments to prove me wrong, unless we have the witness himself contradicting my assumption.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:24 PM
link   
People, we have seen this movie before haven't we!

From now to the end of October, every UFO sighting, video or witness statement from London is going to be relative to this con-man's prediction. He'll say they showed up and use some vague 2 second video to try and prove it. Olivet will disappear then come back with a different Account and try the same thing.

If ET is going to make contact, they ain't going to do it through some middle age french man typing nonsense through a conspiracy website.

Then again .......



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:26 PM
link   

mangust69
they frame5.loadup.ru... can and show themselves it is an epoch-making event can be called Apocalypse is a Greek withdrawal veil but baptize the child of royal blue blood? most probably circumcision


Withdrawing the veil, sure. For what purpose? That's where the 'child' comes...



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 




unless we have the witness himself contradicting my assumption.

Like the time and date?

You act as if the sightings in London are very important but you are playing very loose about if the time and date may apply to somewhere else on the other side of the world apparently in order to make it fit with your "predictions".

Wouldn't it make more sense if the time and date would also be London time since the sightings are supposed to be in London????

You said that at the time the lone witness saw this was 11 minutes after noon in London on the 5th, but then you say "well it was still the 4th in Hawaii". What kind of sense does that make?

And you say I use my imagination too much??
edit on 10/11/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:33 PM
link   

TSOM87
People, we have seen this movie before haven't we!

From now to the end of October, every UFO sighting, video or witness statement from London is going to be relative to this con-man's prediction. He'll say they showed up and use some vague 2 second video to try and prove it. Olivet will disappear then come back with a different Account and try the same thing.

If ET is going to make contact, they ain't going to do it through some middle age french man typing nonsense through a conspiracy website.

Then again .......




Why are you making such an assumption? I clearly described the kind of event you should wait for in the OP.

FYI, I received many critics for my first thread. Why? Because I used the same pseudo. I am not afraid of anyone. Surely not you.

But I see what you are doing here. You prepare the readers to deny my prediction when it will be proved! Clever but dishonest. You assume too much about the ETs' intentions and deeds. Things are often simple.
edit on 11-10-2013 by Olivet because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:40 PM
link   

aLLeKs
Wow... the opening post was so weird... I still don't get why somebody would mention a non related degree.


Because I was answering to a post in the other thread, closed before I was able to reply to.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet
 




unless we have the witness himself contradicting my assumption.

Like the time and date?

You act as if the sightings in London are very important but you are playing very loose about if the time and date may apply to somewhere else on the other side of the world apparently in order to make it fit with your "predictions".

Wouldn't it make more sense if the time and date would also be London time since the sightings are supposed to be in London????

You said that at the time the lone witness saw this was 11 minutes after noon in London on the 5th, but then you say "well it was still the 4th in Hawaii". What kind of sense does that make?

And you say I use my imagination too much??
edit on 10/11/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)


I wrote here that I was not sure if it was noon or midnight:


For all of those who love coincidences, I have some for you. I have made an analysis of the recent sighting over London on October 5th around midnight (not sure if it's noon or midnight though).


Even on this page I wrote: I saw sometimes 12PM being midnight.

What I meant with all of this is that the UFO sighting over London on october 5th is VERY CLOSE IN TIME TO THE YOUNG ROYALS MOVING. And you can't deny it. So, you missed my point. You prefer to look at the finger than to the moon that the finger is showing. You're the fool here with your own closed mind.



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Menedes567
I think this event will happen sometime this month like the OP says, but I am under the impression that the ETs are not telling Olivet the whole story of how this thing is going to play out..... I think that the OP is only privy to less than 20% of what the ETs are about to do, and it will be for the benefit of humanity. I think that each person will have to choose to adopt either a negative or positive attitude against the ETs, and their choices will determine their future spiritual evolution and destiny.

edit on 11-10-2013 by Menedes567 because: Adding some words........


And you're privy to the remaining 80% for the benefit of humanity?



posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Olivet
 




I wrote here that I was not sure if it was noon or midnight:

So...AM and PM are confusing to you?

And with all your specific dates, it suddenly doesn't matter that this lone witness' sighting was not on a day you predicted?
edit on 10/11/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: sp



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join