Why is the family of Miriam Carey NOT allowed to see her body or her young daughter?- Videos.

Miriam Carey's Family NOT Allowed To See Body Or Daughter Of Young Mother Killed [executed] By DC Police

After watching these three videos - I dare you - I defy you to deny that the United States of America is no longer a free nation "with liberty and justice for all."

What more would a rational person need in order to be convicted of the fact that the United States is no longer, NADA, finito! - period? And that we are surely living in a Nazi inspired police state?

What about this video of the House of Representatives applauding - in a standing ovation - the execution of a young black mother whose child was in the car as she was gunned down like a wild dog?

The execution video

===================================
AND: Within the context of my earlier remarks, apropos this thread here ---- and here
suffice it to say that Washington DC is the direct successor of the Third Reich. US rhetoric proclaiming its exceptionalism is akin to the Nationalist Socialist (Nazi) idea of Germans as Ubermensch or superhuman overlords.

Obama and Hitler have much in common. The clinically obese, societally-challenged, mongrel US, does however seem a comically poor substitute for the Aryan Nazis in the role of megalomaniac delusional global Messiah.

YodHeVauHe
Miriam Carey's Family NOT Allowed To See Body Or Daughter Of Young Mother Killed [executed] By DC Police

I'll take a 'shot' at it ... Have you ever seen what a barrage of bullets does to the human body? It's not pretty. If she was hammered by multiple shooters, there probably wasn't much left of her upper body. Why would you want to expose that to an obviously grieving family member?

reply to post by Snarl


Did you even look at the videos? Doubtful! So - Watch the video and your question will be answered............AND - Because they have rights as American citizens, and the family requested - rather demanded - to view the body - to ID the body. They have their reasons and I am sure that they were well aware that there were at least 30 shots fire, 12 of which hit Miriam.

They also want to see Miriam's daughter - its their right!!!

PS...... - are you also saying that the pigs intentionally got in as many head shots as they could? You at least have alluded to it anyway!

reply to post by Snarl


Allow me to fire one right back at you, when did they get the right to dictate
what is and is not too gruesome for grieving family members to see? If it were
my family member i may want to see them as well, even though it might be
a gruesome sight. Also it can bring closure to family, tough as it may be.

Ugly or not, the family should have the right. Dead is dead, whether pretty or not.

The car would probably be considered a deadly weapon.

Also, they won't be stopped from seeing either her body or the child forever. Just until the investigation is completed. And from the video, it seems it was the next day that they tried. What's the status today?

And normal per the family was also prior to these events, which clearly were not normal actions or reactions. A person can very easily be normal one minute and not so normal the next.

The reality is probably more along the lines of the pharm makers want to autopsy the body to see what their lovey drugs did to her. A few adjustments to the formula seems to be in order.

Who has the child?

Why has he / she not been reunited with father, grandparents, siblings?

What happened to the child that they have been taken away?

Weird and weirder.

reply to post by bloodreviara


SORRY relplied to wrong post -

FOR Snarl.............. PS - are you also saying that the pigs intentionally got in as many head shots as they could? You at least have alluded to it anyway!

reply to post by Elliot


The pigs have the child is in "protective custody" - because its a criminal matter.

I think bloodreviara's post is Right as Rain...

Now the government will dictate whether a body is too 'something' to be viewed by the family?

YodHeVauHe
reply to post by bloodreviara

 

SORRY relplied to wrong post -

FOR Snarl.............. PS - are you also saying that the pigs intentionally got in as many head shots as they could? You at least have alluded to it anyway!

edit on 6-10-2013 by YodHeVauHe because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-10-2013 by YodHeVauHe because: (no reason given)

I made an objective reply in response to your post. Why are you taking what I said out of context? Why are you calling people "pigs?" Why did you label your 3d video something like, "The Execution Video?" You're all about the 'drama' aren't you?

'If' this woman was hit 12 times with large caliber ammunition, I'll damn near guarantee what remained of her was something resembling the consistency of Jello.

If I were in charge of the Capitol Police Force, I'd have the officers (who can be seen with their guns drawn in video 3) under investigation for not shooting her there and then. And ... they'd better have a response somewhere along the lines of, "Sir, I didn't have a line of fire which guaranteed I wouldn't hit one of my fellow officers or might strike an innocent bystander.

How she drove away from the barricade is beyond me, but I wasn't there, and don't intend to become an armchair quarterback in something that's obviously getting your goat. Cheers!! This was fun.

YodHeVauHe
reply to post by Snark

 

Hey Snarky.........I see that the answer is yes to my question -

FOR Snark.............. PS - are you also saying that the pigs intentionally got in as many head shots as they could? You at least have alluded to it anyway!

And OHhhhhh .............As for referring to the so-called 'police' as pigs ? Thanks for vring it to our attention: I should have called them swine (as in a herd of grovelling pigs) because there were so damn many of them shooting and shooting and shooting a poor innocent confused young woman - truly filthy b____rds they are.

edit on 6-10-2013 by YodHeVauHe because: (no reason given)

You may call names as you like. I understand you are very upset by the stories you've seen on the news. I am not going to take offense, and I will not fail to be amused by your ranting.

Nonetheless, this woman was at the wheel of a deadly weapon, she was out of control, she would not be brought back under control, and for the safety of others ... her life was taken. Maybe you should consider what those officers are going to have on their consciences for the rest of their lives.

This will never go away for them. They can turn in their badges and their guns, but they won't be able to wash the blood off their hands. They did their jobs, they acted in the moment, and now they get to live with the consequences. That's why their jobs come with paychecks. They are expected to act, they are trained to act, and these guys did. It looked to me like they gave her more of a chance than the situation warranted.

A wise man learns from other's mistakes ... a fool learns from his own. Learn from this: When a Law Enforcement Officer draws his sidearm ... don't move your car.

What about this video of the House of Representatives applauding - in a standing ovation - the execution of a young black mother whose child was in the car as she was gunned down like a wild dog?

The execution video

===================================

This has got to be one of the most disgusting things I have ever seen. For those people to stand and applaud the death of that woman is nothing short of an outright disgrace. Whether she was or wasn't guilty of a crime, no-one should show such delight for the outcome of any loss of life. The actions of the attendees portray a lack of Humanity imo.

reply to post by mindq


That one event alone has brought it all into focus for me - the reality of our present condition (as slaves to Zionism) came home to me in full force. The tragedy of our present situation of enslavement was all totally condensed and fully encapsulated in that one singular event. We are under the oppressive rule of a Marxist/Communist dictatorship.

Of course there are 'cognitive infil(traitors)

YodHeVauHe
reply to post by Snarl

 

Nonsense - shoot the tires then block the car in with four patrol cars - there were 24 on site. Your responses to my thread a somewhat ludicrous given what we know - not just from the event itself - but from our nature as human persons.

As for the term rant - Compare me proudly to Michael Savage...........

He's the only one with the courage to speak out - with the exception of Alex Jones...........I am very happy to be in such good company.

Whose company are you in? Cass Sunstein? That's right - Cass Sunstein (you know! - that guy you pretend not to know about) who most likely has assigned you to ATS, to harass, intimidate, bully and/or otherwise disrupt threads. But you should know that you are not very good at your job.

You got me there!! I think this is the first thing we can agree on in this thread. I don't know who Cass Sunstein is ... in fact ... first time I have ever even heard the name. Don't know who Michael Savage is either, but I have (unfortunately) been somewhat exposed to the lunatic ravings of Alex Jones. If you consider him to be 'good company', maybe I deserve some credit in the accuracy of my guesswork concerning you.

Back to your expansion on this topic: If you possessed even rudimentary knowledge of law enforcement procedures, you would know that law enforcement officers are not trained to shoot out the tires of cars. This is how innocent bystanders pick-up stray rounds. I think you watch too much TV.

You may now have the last word. -Cheers-

reply to post by Snarl


Certain situations call for certain measures rather than to EXECUTE an innocent woman with her baby in the car. And I meant to mention earlier - they also could have used a a spike strip or three to disable the vehicle.

Why do you insist on defending these slime? Where is your head?

BTW - I know PLENTY about police procedure NONE of which will be revealed here - not with people like you present!.