Official Captitol Hill chase/shooting story is a lie, Clearly two people in vehicle

reply to post by 001ggg100


It is so they can confuse the case against the Miriam. It is a PR stunt to change the story about her. PR company doing damage control on a bad public image of a client.

reply to post by Argyll


Are you even looking at the thread or waiting on your messages page for replies?

JBA2848
reply to post by 001ggg100

 

It is so they can confuse the case against the Miriam. It is a PR stunt to change the story about her. PR company doing damage control on a bad public image of a client.

Aaah, but you fail to factor in the multiple witnesses plus the VIDEO we are currently debating over, that shows no such thing... I'm sure there are many more video's out there that are CLEARER... And I'm sure they too will show 1 adult....

Phage
No eyewitness reports of 2 adults in the car?

Isn't that what makes it a conspiracy? The reason why it's on a conspiracy website?

reply to post by SeriousIndividual

Are you even looking at the thread or waiting on your messages page for replies?

I'm not with you?

Are you now claiming that the up-loader of this video in fact knows there were 2 people in the front of the car, but deliberately covered the evidence up?.....to what end?....the old double bluff?

I mean no offence, but your posts are increasingly making no sense

reply to post by SeriousIndividual

Isn't that what makes it a conspiracy? The reason why it's on a conspiracy website?

But this is a conspiracy site like no other......we actually get to the bottom of the "conspiracy".....we don't promote it for the sake of conspiracy!

reply to post by 001ggg100


I already said there was only one adult. Miriam and her baby were there.
And took the time to screen grab a picture from the video to show it.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by JBA2848


That picture you're original reply shows is basically a horrendous version of mine. I can't even begin to take you seriously with that.

reply to post by Argyll


If we are going down that road, the double bluff road, the road which you're taken down when someone is tasked to do something in order to confuse others, then I'd expect people to feel like it's not making any sense. That is the purpose of the double bluff or at least what I described back in one of my previous replies where I spoke of a possibility the uploader has been tasked to bring attention to an easier to debunk portion of the video.

reply to post by SeriousIndividual

That picture you're original reply shows is basically a horrendous version of mine. I can't even begin to take you seriously with that.

That picture with an ad for a "Infiniti Coupe" plastered across the windshield in a close up would have been a good one though wouldn't it?

reply to post by SeriousIndividual



here is a shot, see the cop with his gun stuck in the passenger window. and mot at some head in the passenger seat.




i got some more frames that i'm gonna look at, so far this is the best.

it's plain to see there is no one in that seat.

ETA: i didn't blow it up enough hold on i'll redo it.

reply to post by Argyll


Technically the "ad" isn't in the way of the windows the moment you can see the best view of two people. It's in front of the windshield for just a fraction of a second during a moment where you can't see anything anyway. Having the ad still sitting at the center of the screen does take people's focus away from the video and onto the ad during that moment, but never does it actually block the portion of the video my screenshots come from.

If we are going down that road, the double bluff road, the road which you're taken down when someone is tasked to do something in order to confuse others, then I'd expect people to feel like it's not making any sense. That is the purpose of the double bluff or at least what I described back in one of my previous replies where I spoke of a possibility the uploader has been tasked to bring attention to an easier to debunk portion of the video

reply to post by SeriousIndividual



[sigh]

Why would someone up-load a video purporting to show 2 people in this car....when not a single other person has even mentioned it?

Why would anyone create a conspiracy theory that no one else has thought of....and then de-bunk it themselves?

I made a mistake in one of my posts on page 1 of this thread....I admitted it immediately.....just be the bigger person and admit that you are flogging a dead horse on this one....there was one person in the front of the car.

The youtube up-loader has tried to make a name for him/herself , he or he has tried to pull a stunt and cover up the blatant part of the video that would expose their hoax........frankly I'm surprised you've not only fallen for it, your trying to promote it.

reply to post by SeriousIndividual


You can see the pilar on the car door clearer then yours. And there is nobody sitting in that seat.

reply to post by SeriousIndividual

Technically the "ad" isn't in the way of the windows the moment you can see the best view of two people.

Technically "it is"

Source video it should give better screen grabs.

SeriousIndividual
reply to post by Phage

 

Why are you bringing up the rear seat headrests? Over the past ten minutes I added three new photos to the OP.
Here's the latest-

edit on 5-10-2013 by SeriousIndividual because: (no reason given)

passenger seat...

is Mr White Shirt's trousers there bro.

reply to post by SeriousIndividual

Technically the "ad" isn't in the way of the windows the moment you can see the best view of two people.

Really?

reply to post by JBA2848


This- files.abovetopsecret.com...
is clearer than
This- files.abovetopsecret.com...

?????????

How on earth can you claim that?

reply to post by Argyll


I think I would know if at that moment there's anything to see as I've looked at the original footage countless times. Like I've said multiple times, the ad is never blocking anything worth seeing. Maybe if you're someone who never looked at the original footage you'd think that "ad" is blocking something worth seeing, but if you take the time to watch the original footage you'll realize the ad is blocking nothing worth seeing due to the car being at a certain angle. The moment worth seeing is when the car's left or right side is facing the camera. The ad is not blocking the windows at these moments. Did you even look at the original footage before you began claiming that ad is blocking something worth seeing?