reply to post by Dianec
What makes missing people in the Natioanal forests suspicious is the way they have handled it, and the amount of money they want for a list. That in
and of itself is telling. The forest can be disorienting. I know because I have gotten lost. I will have to get your book but from what I'm hearing
thus far people have reported lost time. This has been cooroborated by those who have found them unusual distances or under strange circumstances.
I hope my questions make sense. I'm confident you have been making charts of similarities, differences, areas, circumstances, etc but mine have to do
with statistics. If you haven't gotten there yet with regard to the questions below do you plan to enlist a control group in order to see what
happens. It would be unethical to have people get lost so you can study them but I'm sure there would be a way to do this in an ethcial way - if not
in a lab environment maybe gathering stories from people who get lost and then analyzing how it affected their perception of time, distance, senses,
etc. It becomes difficult when you cannot contact people so I'm thinking you have already begun this alternative process.
With regard to those who are missing and then recovered (through their own efforts or by others),
have you compiled any statistics (put some numbers into a stats program, etc), to rule out the probability of disorientation, simply getting lost and
then finding ones way back, and other such variables? If so, after ruling these factors out what does the bottom line look like? Still highly
suspicious is what I'm assuming.
For example, if 100 people have been lost but recovered (assuming all have unexplained circumstances involved) one might say 50% could be due to panic
or disorientation affecting the mind. I understand this would take a lot of studying of psychological journals to see what's out there on stress and
the mind and body but just courious if anything preliminary.
For those who have never been found I'm sure rangers chalked it up to death by an animal or exposure, or people wanting to disappear. In these cases
same question - what are the chances of this many people disappearing under the circumstances they did (2 brothers but more cases like this as an
example).
I know these cases are unexplained (those are the ones you are focussing on). I was just wondering what the numbers look like in the end - IE: have
ruled all of this out and still.....
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••••••••••••••••••••••
We are former police officers trained to look for consistent elements that cause linkage amongst incidents, some call this profiling. It is impossible
for me to explain in detail how we came to the conclusions we did. Go to Amazon.com and read reviews by other police officers and rangers about our
Missing 411 books, they rave about how we have uncovered something that truly exists, something unusual.
Kids are found miles and miles beyond what is reasonable. A two year old boy hikes 3000 feet up a steep mountain to be found dead, etc, etc. There are
countless cases of truly unusual facts surrounding these cases.
There is not ONE case in our books where rangers or law enforcement thought an animal was the cause of the death or missing, if it was, the case was
excluded.m Please read my bio.