reply to post by schuyler
Let’s take a closer look at this DeNovo Journal.
It is accessed via www.advancedsciencefoundation.org.... It’s a fairly simple site with a landing page that says: DeNovo Accelerating Science. When
you click on the “Contact” Tab you have to page down where you enter name, etc. and what you want to talk about. At the bottom is the phrase “©
DeVono Scientific Publishing”
So which is it? DeNovo or DeVono? They don’t know how to spell their own name. So let’s go a little further. Below that they list an ISSN, which
is an International Standard Serial Number. It’s ISSN 2326-2869. When you look THAT up in WorldCat, which is a worldwide database of books and
magazines, you find out is published in Big Rapids, Michigan by Advanced Science Publishing. There is no listing for such an organization in Big
Rapids directories. Once again, no libraries in the entire world have holdings because it is an online publication only. According to a review posted
at WorldCat:
According to the author (of the only paper in the first issue) herself, this amateurish journal/website was put up hurriedly to publish a paper
(claiming to prove the existence of bigfoot/sasquatch by means of DNA evidence), which had been turned down by various publications over a period of
some years. She claims that another journal (which had never published an issue) was going to publish it but backed out, so she bought that journal
and changed its name to DeNovo. The article, which sold for $30, received (informally) very negative comments online from scientists in the field of
genomics. Some time after going live, the website/journal began to offer peer-reviewed publication for up to $1500/manuscript.
www.worldcat.org...
I could find no reference to the $1500 on the site today, but understand what this fellow is saying. DeNovo, the journal, was willing to “publish”
a scientific paper “with peer review” (for which they advertised for the peers) if the author paid them $1500. This is not the only place to do
this. There are other publications that charge a “per page” fee for publication, a practice widely condemned in academia as pseudo-academic.
It’s a scam, really, that preys on the “publish or perish” fears of assistant professors without tenure. Here’s a good article on the
practice: www.nytimes.com...
So we have “Advanced Science Foundation,” “Advanced Science Publishing,” and DeNovo Scientific Publishing.com.
Advance Science Foundation
+ No Listing in the IRS Data on US non profit organizations. This lists all organization that have applied for and/or received IRS 501c3 status as a
non profit organization.
+ No Listing in Associations Unlimited. This is the main library reference source for foundations and associations, the first reference source a
librarian would consult when tracking down an organization
+No Listing in Foundation Directory Online, a pay-to-use compilation of foundations in the US.
Advanced Science Publishing
+ No listing in Reference USA, which is a nationwide listing of all businesses and residences. We’re assuming “Publishing” refers to some sort
of business here.
DeNovo Scientific Publishing
+ Quite a few pages of companies that have the name DeNovo in Reference USA, from cafes to spas, but none that would indicate any sort of publishing
and none in Michigan.
+ There is a Whois entry is protected by a privacy screen so you cannot tell who the owner is, but the domain itself is “unfinished.” It takes you
to a “you are almost done!” page which gives directions to the domain owner on how to complete connection of the domain name to WIX which is an
online “cloud based” web site builder that allows amateurs to build a web site using “drag and drop” tools. In other words, the domain has
never been actually published.
So what has happened here, really? Ms. Ketchum failed to pass peer review for any existing publication, so first she got help to create a
“journal” called JAMEZ through Scholastica which is an online “open source” site dedicated to circumventing the pseudo-academic “pay to
publish” scenario listed above and, indeed, all academic journals. JAMEZ never published a single issue or article.
When that fell through Ketchum started up DeNovo by buying a couple of domains and getting a (entirely free) ISSN from the Library of Congress
Copyright Office. With that she was in business, though rather sloppily. There is no “Advanced Science Publishing” company anywhere. It’s bogus.
There is an “Advanced Science Foundation,” but it is a domain only. It isn’t real in the sense that it is registered with the IRS as a
foundation or in any other recognized source. It doesn’t pay taxes, doesn’t have a phone or an address, doesn’t even have an email address.
Similarly, DeNovo Scientific Publishing is a registered domain, but does not have a working web site at all.
Ketchum failed to get her paper published anywhere, so she decided to publish it herself on her own site, and disguise its origins and make the site
appear as if it were a legitimate scientific journal fully cognizant of “peer review.”
Now she’s pointing to this saying, in effect, “See? I’m published in a peer-reviewed journal!” No, she is not. It's all smoke and mirrors.
It's fake, and not even a very good fake. There are so many loose ends and flaws in this scheme that it is embarrassing. Neither DeNovo, DeVono,
DeNovo Publishing, Advanced Science Publishing, or Advance Science Foundation have any academic standing whatsoever. To continue to insist this is
real is simply delusional. And that's really sad. It's like continuing to believe in Billy Meier's alien ray gun even after it has been proven to
be a plastic toy available on eBay.
edit on 9/25/2013 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••••••
I'll try to be as patient as possible, but this strategy has been used too many times, its old and not innovative.
I sincerely doubt this person read the paper or, if they understood the science....
**If you can't attack the white paper (science), attack something on its periphery.
Again, no mention of bad science.
No mention that all 8 Phd's are wrong on their strategies and testing.
No mention that 10+ labs, including a university lab all came to the same result.
No mention that every other DNA test ever completed on a bgft sample came back human based.
No mention that not one university was willing to tackle this topic until Dr. Ketchum and her team did something that was revolutionary, extract the
DNA at a nuclear level of a bgft sample where it HAD NEVER been done before.
If you want truthful, non-hyped and a sensitive response to the issues drawn above, go to this site:
bf-field-journal.blogspot.com...
There is a reason why mainstream journals lied to Dr. Ketchum, yes they lied. The emails are on the site I noted.
The journals never found an issue with the science and testing-NONE.
Please go to that site, go deep and read about the issues Dr. Ketchum faced, it was truly unbelievable.
All the best.