Lt. Col. Michael Aquino Admits To "UFO" Technology Cover-Up [Whistleblower Testimony]

reply to post by JayinAR


It is true, he cannot break security oaths, but has given many hints throughout this thread. One of them is that he worked with the producers of Dark Skies and suggested there was truth mixed into that story. Another one was in the above post:

If an ET civilization wanted to make contact with Earth, and not either biocontaminate this planet or get biocontaminated itself [as in War of the Worlds], it would do so by EMS transmission from an insulated distance. That means space, not even our atmosphere (which is bioalive). That's about as far as I can go on this, but, really, think about it.

Either way, Jacque Vallee's description of a "strange force" behind this phenomenon seems fitting. The mystery remains...

reply to post by corsair00


Yeah, I read the thread. If you squint your eyes and torque your tongue just right you may be led to the conclusion we have had dialogue.

Perhaps for some this is good enough, but it isn't for me. Maybe the esteemed gentleman should have a sit down with his buddy Col. Alexander and Dr. Vallee about skinwalker.

I would add that there is a strong possibility that aliens, granted they are out there, do not have a home world.

If that is true, we may not have to worry about biocontamination from their end. So...if their genetic sciences are sufficiently advanced, they may be able to easily overcome our illnesses.

Perhaps this explains abduction of both people and cattle. Creating medicines.

reply to post by JayinAR


I am not sure. But there is some evidence from NASA missions, namely STS-115, that UFOs have used EMS transmissions to interfere in various ways. In one instance on the International Space Station, the doors were mysteriously jammed up when a UFO was in close proximity. This entire situation was caught on audio AND video.

Ways and means, and the inbetweens.

This from 2006(!):

AN EXTRAORDINARY "hyperspace" engine that could make interstellar space travel a reality by flying into other dimensions is being investigated by the United States government.

The hypothetical device, which has been outlined in principle but is based on a controversial theory about the fabric of the universe, could potentially allow a spacecraft to travel to Mars in three hours and journey to a star 11 light years away in just 80 days, according to a report in today's New Scientist magazine.

The theoretical engine works by creating an intense magnetic field that, according to ideas first developed by the late scientist Burkhard Heim in the 1950s, would produce a gravitational field and result in thrust for a spacecraft.

Also, if a large enough magnetic field was created, the craft would slip into a different dimension, where the speed of light is faster, allowing incredible speeds to be reached. Switching off the magnetic field would result in the engine reappearing in our current dimension.

www.scotsman.com/news/sci-tech/welcome-to-mars-express-only-a-three-hour-trip-1-686425

Ooooo-eeeee-oooooo.

JayinAR
However, if you can warp the space around your craft into the shape of a wave any matter in front of you will be warped around you. There was a thread here not too long ago that dealt with this. It was based on the work they are currently doing at JPL. The idea is to, somehow, use the universe's rate of expansion as you method of ftl travel, and accelerate from there.

Sheesh, you Earth people ... I keep forgetting you're back in the hick stage of chemical rockets. For interstellar joyrides you need photon engines, which are an AMP variation. Once again, anti-matter projectors (AMPs) are devices designed to emit harmonious streams of positrons and antiprotons through the bombardment of matter by proton beams energized at a level of several billion electron-volts. When the antimatter particles are accelerated via electromagnetic coils, they combine with and annihilate particles of matter in their path, producing zero mass photons and a great deal of gamma radiation of explosive energy many hundred times greater than that caused by a matter-fusion bomb of similar weight - for instance, your hydrogen bombs.

The problem was originally one of containing, directing, and synchronizing this radiation, because gamma goes through almost everything. Finally managed through a sort of "electromagnetic-mirror" coil system, so you've got what amounts to a "gamma ray laser" or graser, synchronizing gamma rays from atomic nucleii rather than X-rays from the outside electrons, e.g. lasers. Now you've got all the interstellar propulsion you want. Then all you have to worry about is running into something which you're going too fast to detect, hence the smaller nose-AMPs. It works, but it's obviously dangerous to anything in its path. So the moment you hit the brakes to sublite, you've got to switch it off. Of course at SL you don't need it anymore, because now your EMS navigation sensing systems work again.

Forget all that nonsense about "warped space", "hyperspace", "wormholes", etc. This is just Mickey Mouse math stemming from getting what you call "special relativity" wrong all the way back to Michelson-Morley. Your planet will get it sorted out by the time you're ready to build and use AMPs & PEs. Then these old 20th-century distortions will seem as quaint as flat-Earthism is today.

reply to post by maquino

reply to post by maquino


Do you think what you described in this post is the final frontier of space travel (anti matter propulsion I think you said)? If not have you imagined what the next steps would be, what are some other ways uber superior intelligences could zip around? Do you think there is an ultimate limit to the evolution of technology...I mean thats a silly question, obviously there is because there are laws and limits, but I guess from our perspective im asking how much farther would you say there is to go, and whats the game plan when one gets there?

reply to post by ImaFungi


Boyd Bushman (born 1936) is a retired senior research engineer who worked for Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, Texas Instruments and Hughes Aircraft. Regarded as one of the inventors of the Stinger missile.

He has gone on the record with David Sereda to talk about a variety of alternative energy and top secret technologies that he has personally worked on over the years and/or has direct knowledge of. He gives some examples of antigravity effects, such as the Hutchison Effect, and demonstrates antigravity with simple toys and magnets. But he also spends time dealing with the actual SCIENCE and mathematics behind much of this advanced technology, and reveals that he and many other scientists working above top secret are actively working on viable technological solutions to our world's problems, right now.

ImaFungi
reply to post by maquino

 

Do you think what you described in this post is the final frontier of space travel (anti matter propulsion I think you said)? If not have you imagined what the next steps would be, what are some other ways uber superior intelligences could zip around? Do you think there is an ultimate limit to the evolution of technology...I mean thats a silly question, obviously there is because there are laws and limits, but I guess from our perspective im asking how much farther would you say there is to go, and whats the game plan when one gets there?

Personally I think we are limited by our imaginations.
There is so much technology in the world now that was once "impossible".
Also I think we are nowhere near the limits of where technology can/will take us.
We barely know whats in the oceans, let alone "off planet", and we are still discovering new life on earth.
We are like toddlers in the universe.

reply to post by OneManArmy


This is true. But I have many good reasons to assume that the really incredible and mind-bending technologies are kept at the highest classification levels and have far surpassed the declassified reports of various technology that we have read about on this thread. The most exotic stuff is probably approaching magic, at this time. The peasants of the world, sure we have iPhones and some pretty cool gadgets, but I do believe the Black Ops have teleportation and time travel.

For real.


[Phil Corso Jr. reveals that the real reason for the UFO cover-up is because these crafts are capable of time travel and that work on this issue started with Einstein and T. Townsend Brown et al. on the Philadelphia Experiment - which was successful. Lt. Col. Aquino has hinted at the connection between UFOs and the Philadelphia Experiment previously on this thread.]

Photo of Michael Aquino and John Alexander, and their wives, created and posted by Aquino himself



Twilight Language

ImaFungi
Do you think what you described in this post is the final frontier of space travel (anti matter propulsion I think you said)?

I wouldn't presume to say "final frontier", because there are always new scientific discoveries to be made.

However we do know a great deal about the matter/antimatter/energy interrelationship; it is actually not too complicated in principle, though it is much harder to apply, particularly when you're working with antimatter in an otherwise-matter environment. Right now human science is at the level where it can produce only tiny amounts of AM for extremely brief periods. This is probably a good thing, because, as mentioned, AM/M explosiveness is much greater than fusion [hydrogen] bombs.

In science fiction you can get around problems of space travel by just creating fantasy devices like "warp drives", "hyperspace", "jumps", "stargates", etc. In science itself, misunderstandings of concepts like "special relativity" have led to mathematical nonsense like "higher dimensions", "curved space", "wormholes", etc. This is fun in the abstract, but simply has no reality in the objective universe. If you want to go to Mars, in other words, there's no shortcut. You just have to get in a spacecraft and go there.

In sci-fi stories and movies, you can cut any corner you like. Travel between planets, solar systems, or even galaxies is as easy as taking an automobile trip. Spaceships have "artificial gravity" [except, smartly in 2001]. Many if not all planets have Earth-gravity & air, and there is no biocontamination problem. Everyone everywhere speaks English, or at least thinks it telephathically. The "alien" in the above photo knows the English alphabet and numeric system well enough to correct algebraic equations written in it. And so on.

Back in 1977, after the original Star Wars movie was released, I wrote a story for friends spinning off on it, The Dark Side. As my Introduction and General Dakkar's technical commentary point out, I deliberately attempted to avoid these "conveniences". Thus I mapped out the planetary locations on a 3-dimensional grid of the Milky Way Galaxy, and timed/coordinated flights between them. Necessary speeds were attained by ionic and photonic propulsion systems. One of the more amusing problems had to do with space combat: In movies, these are as easily done as the gang fight in West Side Story. In reality, particularly on multi-solar-system scale, opposing forces would have an extremely difficult time just finding one another! And, with apologies to the Enterprise, energy weapons like lasers, phasers, etc. would not show bright "trails" to their targets, because there's no atmosphere in space to reflect them.

I didn't tackle things like the language & biological problems because my story would have become completely bogged down in them. But it was an interesting exercise to go as far as I did.

Anyway the "moral" of all this is just not to confuse science and sci-fi: Don't try to get around real scientific problems and challenges by just tossing out fantasy "ways around" them. Believe it or not, when it was first discovered that there was no air in space, some people proposed that in this case humans could travel through it without needing to breathe!

maquino
...In science itself, misunderstandings of concepts like "special relativity" have led to mathematical nonsense like "higher dimensions"...

Yeah, Relativity certainly seems to be no more than a "ghost" of certain aspects of that which we call physics, rather than the building block of all future knowledge. A step-stool, maybe, if it doesn't keep us too narrow in focus.

The word "dimension" as relates to ufology is often misused/misunderstood and definitely open to interpretation.

It was established earlier in this thread that you consider Set to be a real and conscious being. Where do Set--and presumably other beings--reside when they aren't visiting us? I ask you, because I sincerely want your take on this and assume you might have enough experience/knowledge to expand on the question.

I've seen things that went from here to "there." That is, not apparently "here" anymore. Where is "there" in your opinion?

Lt. Col. Michael Aquino??? Whose this bloke? LOL .... I must say I have never heard of him nor does it sound like I should bother with anything he has to say. I did however read the Ops first post. I get really annoyed with small minded individuals who think they are gods with a small "g" claiming to release back engineered/or its our technology pfffttt! Hogwash nonsense. All the crack pots and sorry to the American public (the smart ones) come out of the States. Im sorry but this is where all the nonsense in UFOLOGY is coming from not to mention it's the Country that wont budge regarding the subject and it's files. Steven Greer although his claims and stories are way out there the new videos on youtube The Sirius files that are being released almost daily air traffic controllers,Navy, Pilot interviews are in my opinion the real whistleblowers and people in positions that are coming forward with their stories are what people should be looking at. Not once in any of the videos did anyone know exactly what the heck they were dealing with. The Roswell Incident ... Alien bodies recovered 1 was alive sent the little fella sent off to Area51 for debriefing, they yelled and screams at him "we want answers now!" Slapped him about abit with a response from the little guy.. " Who the f... do you think you are? your not even a pimple on my little arse!" That's how comical the subject is becoming. So much B.S these days.

My little Roswell story above is just as credible as Mr Aquinno's. I may just write a book and come to the States and lecture at the UFOC!

The GUT
Where do Set--and presumably other beings--reside when they aren't visiting us? I ask you, because I sincerely want your take on this and assume you might have enough experience/knowledge to expand on the question.

O.K.: the short/simple version:

In Setian philosophy we speak of two universes: the Objective Universe (OU) and the Subjective Universe (SU).

The OU is the “universe” that most people generally understand by that term, e.g. the totality of matter, antimatter, and the convertible energy between them. It also includes the empty space between all such displacements of it. For atheists this OU is “everything”.

The SU is not one but many. Each SU is the isolate consciousness of being of a sentient entity, human or otherwise. It is this which provides a point of perspective from which that entity can apprehend the OU, and by so doing realize complete distinction from it. It is the “not me” in contrast to the “me”.

The isolate self-conscious entity (ISCE) perceives not only the components of the OU, but regularities or OU laws which are absolute and continuous. Thus the phenomenon of gravity behaves identically throughout the OU, as do the characteristics of the periodic table of elements. The forces which establish and maintain these laws are what the Egyptians called the neteru, or “Principles of Nature" [from the hieroglyphic ntr], what Pythagoras and Plato later called “Forms” or “First Principles”. Later, cruder polytheisms would call them “gods”, and even cruder monotheisms would refer to them altogether as “God”.

It is both easier and more difficult to “get at” the neter, Form, or Principle underlying the existence of each ISCE. We know that it exists because we exist; it is the force generating and sustaining our several ISCs. As we perceive there to be many ISCEs, and that each one has a uniquely different identity, intelligence, and expression, we further realize that this neter creates ISCEs which, while all possessing the same ISC, are all uniquely different from one another.

We can identify and see the OU neteru by the constant and consistent reflections of their existence. We may identify them at many levels of focus and intensity, from vague abstractions to images whose “laws” are articulated. Nowhere was this more eloquently described than by H. Rider Haggard’s She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed, herself a Priestess of Isis:

[Allan Quatermain] “I have heard of Isis of the Egyptians, Lady of the Moon, Mother of Mysteries, spouse of Osiris whose child was Horus the Avenger.”

[Ayesha] “Aye, and I think will hear more of her before you have done, Allan, for now something comes back to me concerning you and her and another. I am not the only one who has broken the oaths of Isis and received her curse, Allan, as you may find out in the days to come. But what of these heavenly queens?”

“Only this, Ayesha: I have been taught that they were but phantasms fabled by men with many another false divinity, and could have sworn that this was true. And yet you talk of them as real and living, which perplexes me.”

“Being dull of understanding doubtless it perplexes you, Allan. Yet if you had imagination, you might understand that these goddesses are great principles of nature: Isis of throned Wisdom and strait virtue, and Aphrodite of Love as it is known to men and women who, being human, have it laid upon them that they must hand on the torch of life in their little hour. Also you would know that such principles can seem to take shape and form and at certain ages of he world appear to their servants visible in majesty, though perchance today others with changed names wield their sceptres and work their will. Now you are answered on this matter.”

Apprehension, identification, and visualization of the ISC neter seems easy, because it is the “general” behind the “particular” of our own selves. However the problem then becomes how to discover, apprehend, and define our own ISC. Precisely because it is altogether apart from the OU, we cannot see its reflection in any OU phenomena. It is “pure existence”, which caused a desperate Descartes to grasp at the straw of Cogito, ergo sum, and Hegel to affirm “self-consciousness” at the summit of his phenomenology of mind, and Nietzsche to liken it to the “building of horizons”. At a drunken party of fellow Harvard professors, Edward Jessup, Ph.D. proclaimed:

I’m a man in search of his true self. How archetypically American can you get?

Everybody’s looking for his true self. We’re all trying to fulfill ourselves, understand ourselves, get in touch with ourselves, get ahold of ourselves, face the reality of ourselves, explore ourselves, expand ourselves.

Ever since we dispensed with God, we’ve got nothing but ourselves to explain this meaningless horror of life. We’re all weekending at est or meditating for forty minutes a day or squatting on floors in a communal OM or locking arms in quasi-Sufi dances or stripping off the deceptions of civilized life and jumping naked into a swimming pool filled with other naked searchers for self.

Well, I think that true self, that original self, that first self, is a real, mensurate, quantifiable thing, tangible and incarnate. And I’m going to find the f**ker!

Dr. Jessup found his ISC by the process of elimination - of all OU interaction by means of sensory-deprivation tanks. The result was a devastating shock for which he was completely, and almost terminally, unprepared.

Philosophically, Existentialists like Sartre confront their ISC with horror and “nausea” that it exists at all: an utter anomaly against the OU. In conventional religions the ISC is the ultimate “sin”: so absolute that it can be “redeemed” only through OU-absorption and annihilation, e.g. “Grace”. Its source is, of course, the genius of all such "evil", the "Devil".

The process of Setian initiation, on the other hand, prepares the Black Magician to find not only his true and full self through the discipline of Xeper, but to confront its source, Set, through that most precise, refined, and magnificent concentration of thought defined by Plato as nœsis. Set, like all derivative manifestations, is unreflected by anything of the OU. He exists through each and every ISCE, and they exist only from him. The Temple of Set apprehends him as Set because that is how he identified himself in the Book of Coming Forth by Night on the North Solstice of 1975CE. But this is a convenience of expression and communication for the neter of the SU.

At the culmination of his initiation, the priest Her-Bak was admonished:

Isha Schwaller de Lubicz, Her-Bak
O Her-Bak. O Egypt. You are the temple which the neter of neters inhabits. Awaken him ... then let the temple fall crashing.

reply to post by saucerprobe


Well, if there is any truth to the possibility that Lt. Col. Aquino was the master PsyOps who dreamed up the "alien grey from Roswell" mythology in the first place, your comment is absolutely hysterical and ironic in the extreme.

And even if Aquino had nothing to do with the Roswell stories, purposeful disinformation to cast deliberate absurdity on the subject, he is still legit in his military credentials and his work with MindWar. You said you only read the first post and did not read any further. You are also from Australia, so your general ignorance towards America and your skepticism on the subject of UFOlogy has led you to your abrupt dismissal of Aquino. I am sure he doesn't mind.

I agree with you about Greer and The Disclosure Project/Sirius testimonies. I find them very fascinating myself, and in fact, even Colonel John Alexander supports many of the whistleblower testimonies - particularly that of Bob Salas. Many people are probably not aware that Greer and company are actively making ALL of their videotaped testimony available for free online, on their YouTube channel.

My particular favorite testimony comes from a Corporal who was called in to a UFO crash site in Peru. His descriptions of the craft and occupants are very compelling.

reply to post by maquino


Yes, I understand what you mean, but I was not referring to science fiction. I thought this thread was about UFOs and intelligence and nature and science. I was merely asking how far beyond antimatter thrusters do you posit an intelligent specie can create a propulsion vehicle? Or is propulsion most likely the only form of possible space travel, so the highest evolved and most intelligent life forms in the universe will be fated to cap off at this discovery?

ImaFungi
Yes, I understand what you mean, but I was not referring to science fiction. I thought this thread was about UFOs and intelligence and nature and science. I was merely asking how far beyond antimatter thrusters do you posit an intelligent specie can create a propulsion vehicle? Or is propulsion most likely the only form of possible space travel, so the highest evolved and most intelligent life forms in the universe will be fated to cap off at this discovery?

We're dealing with travel across the Objective Universe (OU) by objects composed of its substances/energies. Therefore we're limited by their natural-law limitations. EM radiation travels at a specific velocity in vaccuum, so merely pointing a flashlight or a laser at Earth from Alpha Centauri won't get its emissions here any faster than lite1. The only way to increase speed is to build mechanisms with sufficient propulsive power to exceed lite1, which is theoretically possible through the photonic engine system I previously described. Conceivably someone might design a different kind of engine with different fuel, but I'm not aware of any right now.

The "bottom line" is that in principle speed is not a barrier to interstellar travel, but navigation at lite1+ is a pisser because navigation requires points of reference accessed through the EMS, and at lite1+ you've essentially thrown the EMS in the catbox. So before going to lite1+ you would either have to be very sure of your direction [and that nothing else will blunder into it], or you have to slow to sublite periodically to check your bearings. Both of these solutions are kind of grabass: The first one would require your being able to see and calculate to pinpoint precision everything over that distance [and remember that all your detection systems are limited to lite1]. The second would mean slowing down all the way to sublite from translites multiple enough to get you to Earth in reasonable real-time. Then you'd have to hit the gas again. This extensive de/receleration would take a great deal of time to ensure that Mr./Ms. ET didn't get squashed to pancakes in the process. So we're basically back to the nose-AMP solution. And just hope that somewhere en route you don't run into an antimatter object!

I brought up sci-fi just to note that such authors like to get around these annoying problems by postulating things like "higher dimensions", "warps", and "hyperspace jumps". A few posts above there's a news story about the government dumping more $$$ into some crazy "dimensions" nonsense - shades of the $20M flushed down the toiler for the "remote viewing" gig in the 1980s. Is this a great country or what?

corsair00
My particular favorite testimony comes from a Corporal who was called in to a UFO crash site in Peru. His descriptions of the craft and occupants are very compelling.

If I were questioning LCpl John Weygandt, I'd thank him, wish him a good day, and forget him.

His initial "groundwork" about enlisting in the USMC is reasonable enough; he apparently exited later as a lance corporal, which is equivalent to PFC in the Army.

(1) Says he was trained as an air defense missile gunner, not an infantryman. Why would a Marine with this MOS be assigned to a base perimeter defense job?

(2) Says his detachment was assigned to a base in Peru in March-April 1997. What was/is the name/location of the base? A US DOD base might have a USMC perimeter guard, but a Peruvian base would have Peruvian guards. A non-DOD US base would have either Peruvian military or civilian contract guards. Status of Forces agreements and etc.

(3) Says 5-6 humvees traveled to the crash site. That's a minimum of about 20 Marines. Who are the others and why haven't we heard from any of them?

(4) If the mission was to establish perimeter security for the crash site, the Marines would not have gone to the aircraft itself, unless it were a human aircraft and someone was critically injured. They would have established the assigned perimeter and waited for the rescue/inspection party.

(5) This UFO was a large craft which left a large burned and blackened area around it and a big hole in the cliff. You can't "cover up" damage on this scale. Where's the site, so we can go take a look with GoogleEarth?

(6) The UFO "buried itself in a granite cliff". Any idea how hard granite is? You need about 2 tons' pressure with diamond drills to cut into the stuff. Anything hitting it would just disintegrate, assuming the UFO was not made of granite or something that heavydense itself.

(7) There was purplegreen iridescent goo all over the place. As it happens, I owned a 2004 Mustang SVT Cobra with "Mystichrome" purplegreen iridescent colorshifting paint. I agree it's cool.

(8) Got the mystichrome on his uniform and skin, which it burned. Why would he be so foolhardy as to contact the stuff at all?

(9) The UFO was buried in the cliff halfway down. How did the Marines get down to it when they just hopped into humvees with weapons for perimeter security? They wouldn't have brought rappelling gear along.

(10) If Sergeants Allen, Atkins, and Montelegro were angry at Weygandt for going down to the UFO, why did they let him go? They were NCOs with command authority over him. And presumably someone, probably more than one, had to help him get down/up the cliff.

(11) When he climbed back up, he saw men in camouflage uniforms with "DOE" on the back. What would the Department of Energy be doing investigating a UFO site? That would be a different specialized agency, or initially the USAF. Not to mention that Peru controls its own airspace, so the US can't just waltz in whenever it likes.

(12) He saw some DOEers in camos, others in biosuits. Had this been a real situation, everyone would have been in biosuits, and if Marines had been tasked with establishing a perimeter, it would have been a long-distance mandatory perimeter.

(13) He was taken to another base, placed in an interrogation room, and interrogated by several persons in ordinary clothes. Despite his close contact and purplegreen goo all over him, he was not decontaminated or sterilized or quarantined. His interrogators all exposed themselves to his contamination.

(14) His life was threatened by a USAF Lt.Col. and others. Marines couldn't care less if you threaten their lives, since they're the proverbial "meanest MFers in the valley". They do follow orders, also because they're Marines, so all that was needed was an official order that the whole incident was classified. Then the only way a Marine would talk about it would be if it actually never happened at all. You have to have been or known a Marine to appreciate how tough-assed they are. Basically the only difference between a Marine and a Rottweiler is that after awhile the Rottweiler lets go.

(15) He overheard a couple of women talking about UFOs regularly flying in/out of the atmosphere at Mach-10. Anything in the Earth's atmosphere at Mach-10 would be ET-jerky in short order.

Fun tall tale. Credibility goose-egg, unfortunately.