It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Saying there is no evidence for chemtrails is a bit disingenuous.
It's a nice argument seeing as I can't go get a jet equipped with atmospheric equipment, fly up there and get behind one of these planes with huge amounts of lingering trails to say, "SEE RIGHT HERE IS THE PROOF!"
We have to test the ground, and wait for whistle blowers. One such person who was in the air force did blow the whistle
Chemtrails involve the deliberate spraying of hazardous materials into the atmosphere that goes back over 30 years. Also known as cloud seeding, the U.S. Government has been spraying harmful chemicals and heavy metals into the atmosphere for numerous reasons.
As for the aluminum and others in the ground samples, yes jet exhaust could cause a minor blip in the amount of aluminum.
We have to test the ground, and wait for whistle blowers. One such person who was in the air force did blow the whistle:
Saying there is no evidence for chemtrails is a bit disingenuous. It's a nice argument seeing as I can't go get a jet equipped with atmospheric equipment, fly up there and get behind one of these planes with huge amounts of lingering trails to say, "SEE RIGHT HERE IS THE PROOF!"
Saying there is no evidence for chemtrails is a bit disingenuous.
UnifiedSerenity
Saying there is no evidence for chemtrails is a bit disingenuous.
It's a nice argument seeing as I can't go get a jet equipped with atmospheric equipment, fly up there and get behind one of these planes with huge amounts of lingering trails to say, "SEE RIGHT HERE IS THE PROOF!"