It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
bigfatfurrytexan
THIS
My working and personal relationship with President Obama is marked by growing trust. I appreciate this. I carefully studied his address to the nation on Tuesday. And I would rather disagree with a case he made on American exceptionalism, stating that the United States’ policy is “what makes America different. It’s what makes us exceptional.” It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation. There are big countries and small countries, rich and poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way to democracy. Their policies differ, too. We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.
Ormuz
Hi guys,
would i be stretching it if this is something, deliberate ?
I'm not so sure I'm as happy as the rest of the guys posting to this thread and ill explain why.
consider this,
what if the USA is playing bad cop and Russia is playing good cop?
what if Israel and the rest of the cronies know that Syria would jump in and "help a brother out" if anything preemptive happened to Iran.
perhaps Israel has a counter for a nuke strike, but they cant or couldn't counter a chemical strike?
what if this is some extravagant idea to disarm Syria of its chemical cache, only to pave the clear way for a possible preemptive strike or .. false flag .. on Iran?
I dont know guys, while i think it is a good thing that America doesn't get involved within Syria for whatever reason, perhaps Vladimir Putin is just playing into their game by disarming the one thing that scares the crap out of the cronies trying to push their way into Iran.
but then one other thing comes to mind, what if America / cronies are bent on going in and this stops or stalls them, the idea of a false flag / pearl harbor event to encourage millions of Americans to justify the new cause bends my head ..
*shrugs* just random food for thought, perhaps I'm completely wrong ..
My reply begins (was not separated out when posted - all blended into one post).
I think your last scenario is viable. I've written this before so sorry to be repetitive but Obama wanted to shoot first and ask questions later. It fell through for him. The whole thing made no sense so people started to question it. His chance was missed but if another arises it will confirm what my gut is saying.
Something else happens/offers aren't good enough = get congress to say yes = strike = increased terrorism on US citizens = justification for Obama to call them an imminent threat and go beyond a limited strike = disable all of Syria and get control of where pipeline will go and whatever else is making force the first option. Also gets to be right (you all should have listened to me the first time). Also gets total power to do what he wants with the military. Helps his political and financial agenda.
I may be totally off base but I also feel unsettled about this.
Muzz
WhiteAlice
reply to post by Indigo5
Thank you. You are absolutely correct in your assessment of my responses. People just aren't used to that, I think, because it's not typical. I'm a high functioning autistic (for comparison's sake, I score 42 on the autism quotient as friends love to use me as a test to see if the AQ is accurate) with a near eidetic memory and high spatial ability. It's a pain in the arse. If you ever want to mess with me, use a ton of slang.
PUTIN: The United Nations’ founders understood that decisions affecting war and peace should happen only by consensus, and with America’s consent the veto by Security Council permanent members was enshrined in the United Nations Charter. The profound wisdom of this has underpinned the stability of international relations for decades.
The point that in which I agree with Putin on is in regards to international law. Basically, the United Nations was formed with one of its intents being in the hopes to avoid another world war. It established international laws in regards to war and their justifications as well as required the need for approval. The United States is one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and, in a sense, are one of the UN's leaders. If the leadership of any entity does not abide by the rules or laws that the entity requires of all within it, then it basically undermines both the laws' force and the entity, itself.
reply to post by earthling42
We stood against each other during the cold war. But we were also allies once, and defeated the Nazis together.
MRuss
America is exceptional. We have been for a long time.
VoidHawk
What if, they're all in this together (Obama and Putin) and the world is being played!
What if, Russia and America were threatening each other! Would we all start crapping ourselves and beg our leaders to protect us?
I think its all a game.
NewAgeMan
I think it's wonderful the way it's working out, if only the US would STOP playing both sides against the middle in Syria, which has DIRE long range consequences for American Security and Interests in Global Security - and instead, work out and uphold within the context of international law and order (Putin's point) a political solution and an end to the war, but I guess that's up to Assad who Obama subtly implied in his speech with a linkage that I caught could be taken out ie: killed, if there's retaliatory action by him as the military commander of Syrian forces.
It's foolishness though for Putin to tell Obama to put the gun away at this point, so the game continues...
MRuss
America is exceptional. We have been for a long time.
Putin forgot to thank us for his Ipod, his car, his laptop, his refrigerator, his jeans, his central air, his telephone, his wireless internet....and on and on and on.
But I'm proud of what this country has accomplished.
We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.
MarsSentinel
MRuss
America is exceptional. We have been for a long time.
Maybe. But the flaw in your thinking is the "we" that you use.
fact is - there is no useful, meaningful "we" in the US.
"We" did not attack Iraq, Afghanistan, or Syria.
Some dudes in DC and London did that.
"We" didn't invent anything.
"We" is a political fiction.
what do you and the other half million folks in your home town have in common besides a few external, demographic details? Do you decide things in common? Do you meet to discuss policy or the future of your town?
Nope.
We are residents, not citizens in any meaningful way.
It is only those with BIG money who are part of the "we" that is the US in it's policy functions.
See: George Carlin:
VoidHawk
What if, they're all in this together and the world is being played! I think its all a game.
YouTube
"One should never forget that the Rothschilds NEVER lost ownership of both Russia and China, even today." Source