It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
. when you do search you will find it has been cleaned up all the bbc tv footage in the u.k has gone and now the world news clips without the time stamp remain as the only evidence . if only someone that day had stuck a video in this film scene that is going on but i think it would have soon been taken down from youtube .
ZeussusZ
reply to post by geobro
thought it was weird a while ago. Did a google search and couldn't find anything being reported in any NZ news sites before 6am NZ time. This search was done about 10 years after though.
Another strange thing is , the building 7, that wasn't reported with footage till sometime in the afternoon, when it should have been around the time I was watching the "live" secound plane.edit on 24-9-2013 by ZeussusZ because: (no reason given)
whatnext21
I think the thing that really hit my country was how the planes were all grounded and re-routed to Gander Newfoundland and how Canadians helped comfort those displaced people while an atrocity was occurring in their homelands and was not over.edit on 9/10/2013 by whatnext21 because: (no reason given)edit on 9/10/2013 by whatnext21 because: (no reason given)edit on 9/10/2013 by whatnext21 because: (no reason given)
as you have noticed by the time someone picked up a phone to you many minutes had passed .
Baldryck
I was working ATC at RAF Lakenheath at the time. Base Operations called up and told us about between Between 1 and 2 pm. Said they were watching it on TV. I don't recall the exact time of the phone call, but I know it was toward the end of my dayshift witch ended at 2pm.
OtherSideOfTheCoin
Wow!,
just give me a moment or two to debunk this nonsense so it can either be moved to the Hoax Bin on the LOL forum.
So the OP is claiming that
on the day of 9-11 i arrived home after weeks away the television was on for the dog [ he watched t.v ] it was 11.20 am and it was on the t.v then but but but that is 6 .20 am in new york .
Now aside for the fact that the OP's dog can watch tv, lets move on to another small factual error, the OP claims that.
the earliest you could have heard about it in the u.k is 1 .54 pm in most of europe it 2.54 pm .
Well considering that Flight 11 hit the North Tower at 0846 EDT or 1346GMT then the earliest anyone could possibly have heard about it would have been 1346, not 1354 as the OP claims. Now yes i do know that by the time it got picked up by the media it may have been around 14:00 most in the UK heard about the attacks but this timeline is important as its fundamental to the OP's claims.
But to move on to the OPs claims that 9/11 was being reported at 1120GMT or 0620 New York time. So now rather than going over my own recollection of events that day (which strongly contradict the OP's claims) lets look at how the news actually broke in the UK.
Now as you can see from this video the BBC were reporting this just before the second tower was hit, they make reference to it happening just before 9am local time which would be just before 1400 uk time.
So now we can see that the OP's timeline is questionable, as is the claim that it was reported earlier than stated in the UK press as above we can see the BBC's first report who broke the news in the uk.
But even more than that, the OPs claims makes absolutely no sense, it effectively implies that the whole saga of 9/11 that was playing on our TV's on 9/11 was fabricated. it implies that the UK was reporting the whole thing hours earlier and that no one other than the OP seems to have picked up on this.
Really the only way that the OP could be correct is if there was some tear in the fabric of time and he time traveled. Its ludicrous, there are so many problems with the OP's claim's its difficult to know where to start!
I dont think the OP is lying as such rather I just think he has got confused with UK time and New York time and this has confused his understanding of the chronology of events that took place on 9/11. I hope this now clears things up and the OP can see the error of his ways.
I also really hope the mods move this into a more appropriate forum as its clearly factually incorrect.edit on 11-9-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)edit on 11-9-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)
This is probably the calmest report from 9/11 ever.
reply to post by darkbake
The time stamp on your YouTube video from BBC is 8:54 in the morning, sir, so I'm afraid you are mistaken - the BBC seems to have reported on the event early. I don't know - that time stamp could be wrong.
reply to post by geobro
so the attack happened at 08.47.00 s and they had a film crew there and on television at 08.54.00 .
firefight
reply to post by darkbake
The time stamp on your YouTube video from BBC is 8:54 in the morning, sir, so I'm afraid you are mistaken - the BBC seems to have reported on the event early. I don't know - that time stamp could be wrong.
Thats because BBC was using feed from local TV station, these stations would have been Eastern Daylight Time
(EDT) aka 8:54 AM EDT