It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now for the strangeness of it: Scientist are not sure how it formed.
One problem that is difficult to explain is how the ridge follows the equator almost perfectly. There are about 4 hypothesis that are current, but none of them explains why the ridge is confined to the dark hemisphere either.
Originally posted by intrptr
Now for the strangeness of it: Scientist are not sure how it formed.
One problem that is difficult to explain is how the ridge follows the equator almost perfectly. There are about 4 hypothesis that are current, but none of them explains why the ridge is confined to the dark hemisphere either.
One of those theories is that the matter blasted from the moon by the enormous impacts on its surface formed equatorial rings which slowly settled onto the equator of the moon, giving it that ridge like a walnut. I would be interested in hearing any others...
A team of scientists associated with the Cassini mission have argued that the ridge could be a remnant of the oblate shape of the young Iapetus, when it was rotating more rapidly than it does today. The height of the ridge suggests a maximum rotational period of 17 hours. If Iapetus cooled fast enough to preserve the ridge but remained plastic long enough for the tides raised by Saturn to have slowed the rotation to its current tidally locked 79 days, Iapetus must have been heated by the radioactive decay of aluminium-26. This isotope appears to have been abundant in the solar nebula from which Saturn formed, but has since all decayed. The quantities of aluminium-26 needed to heat Iapetus to the required temperature give a tentative date to its formation relative to the rest of the Solar System: Iapetus must have come together earlier than expected, only two million years after the asteroids started to form.
The ridge could be icy material that welled up from beneath the surface and then solidified. If it had formed away from the position of the equator at the time, this hypothesis requires that the rotational axis would have been driven to its current position by the ridge
Iapetus could have had a ring system during its formation due to its large Hill sphere, and that the equatorial ridge was then produced by collisional accretion of this ring. However, the ridge appears too solid to be the result of a collapsed ring. Also, recent images show tectonic faults running through the ridge, apparently inconsistent with the collapsed ring hypothesis.
The ridge and the bulge are the result of ancient convective overturn. This hypothesis states that the bulge is in isostatic equilibrium typical for terrestrial mountains. It means that under the bulge there is material of low density (roots). The weight of the bulge is compensated by buoyancy forces acting on the roots[clarification needed]. The ridge is also built of less dense matter. Its position along the equator is probably a result of the Coriolis force acting on a liquid interior of Iapetus.
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
Could the ridge and orbit be explained by 2 moons coliding to make 1?
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by eriktheawful
Thanks for the rundown on the equatorial ridge, all of those are interesting. I did not know the ridge does not circumvent the globe.
theory #5:
(I'm making this up). The huge impacts altered the orbit away from Saturn where it had been accreting material directly from the rings of Saturn. Before the orbits change, it had a different spin rate as well so that material was only settling onto one side from Saturn.
theory #6
The impacts from twin objects (one on top of the other in rapid succession) set up opposing shockwaves that met around the other side of the planet, reflecting back and forth (like ripples in a pond go back and forth). The ridge formed where the rebounding shock waves met again and again...
Since the twin strikes (over lapped craters) are offset from each other, the ridge line only partially circumvents the globe. (I made that up too.)
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
Ok here is what really formed Iapetus,bare with me.
There are numerous different size blackholes darting around the galaxy at near light speeds. One such blackhole rushed through the center of Mars causing the huge volcano and the great canyon. The blackhole dragged a portion of mars core out towards saturn. Saturns gravity captured the core and saturns ice moons colided and covered half the moon in ice. The walnut shape is a result of interaction of gravitional fields of Mars,the blackhole and Saturn.....
So there you go,my supercomputer confirms this
Originally posted by mcl1150
reply to post by eriktheawful
Fourth image looks like the Death Star from Star Wars, amazing!
i forgot to mention it dragged a large proportion of the water on mars aswell. Where do you think saturns rings come from?
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
Ok here is what really formed Iapetus,bare with me.
There are numerous different size blackholes darting around the galaxy at near light speeds. One such blackhole rushed through the center of Mars causing the huge volcano and the great canyon. The blackhole dragged a portion of mars core out towards saturn. Saturns gravity captured the core and saturns ice moons colided and covered half the moon in ice. The walnut shape is a result of interaction of gravitional fields of Mars,the blackhole and Saturn.....
So there you go,my supercomputer confirms this
Interesting theory, but there are some problems with it:
Iapetus mean density is 1.088. This means is made up mostly of ice water. Only 20% of Iapetus is actually rock, loosely spread through it.
Interesting idea though.