It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
intrptr
reply to post by qmantoo
Thanks for the list of links. I was "reviewing" the first few lines of that when I began to notice that most of the links have disappeared..
The same types of "disclaimers" appear on a lot of my stored links to videos and reports about Fukushima. "This video has been removed… sorry about that". "This page is missing" or "--no longer found".
Inocuos…
I wonder how much Tepco damage control is spending to cover up the disaster as opposed to cleaning it up? There must be an army of web chasers monitoring sites all over the world furiously playing catchup.edit on 28-1-2014 by intrptr because: changed
…and endless shills.
Human0815
reply to post by wishes
One more Time:
You can't hide Radioactivity (huge amounts)
intrptr
reply to post by wishes
…and endless shills.
As if on cue.
Thats why I said, see?
And you are right about sweeping things under the rug.
The fight in the courts about the "rights" to data about Fukushima on the internet is ongoing. Tepco wants it all deleted… except for what they "release".
Link
wishes
intrptr
reply to post by wishes
…and endless shills.
As if on cue.
Thats why I said, see?
And you are right about sweeping things under the rug.
The fight in the courts about the "rights" to data about Fukushima on the internet is ongoing. Tepco wants it all deleted… except for what they "release".
Link
Of course they want anything negative about them deleted, it's their modus operandi. The last thing we will ever get from the IAEA and Tepco is truth. We will continue to get circular speaking, endless praises about their 'progress' and blah blah rhetoric. And we're expected to relax and believe them that the world is in safe hands. Courts will uphold the secrecy laws, they're all controlled - that's why genuine good guys NEVER get anywhere near the top and why we'll never see any real change except for the faces. Just amazes me how many people buy into their false reassurances though it shouldn't - they've worked hard at putting everyone to sleep for many, many years.
RickinVa
wishes
intrptr
reply to post by wishes
…and endless shills.
As if on cue.
Thats why I said, see?
And you are right about sweeping things under the rug.
The fight in the courts about the "rights" to data about Fukushima on the internet is ongoing. Tepco wants it all deleted… except for what they "release".
Link
Of course they want anything negative about them deleted, it's their modus operandi. The last thing we will ever get from the IAEA and Tepco is truth. We will continue to get circular speaking, endless praises about their 'progress' and blah blah rhetoric. And we're expected to relax and believe them that the world is in safe hands. Courts will uphold the secrecy laws, they're all controlled - that's why genuine good guys NEVER get anywhere near the top and why we'll never see any real change except for the faces. Just amazes me how many people buy into their false reassurances though it shouldn't - they've worked hard at putting everyone to sleep for many, many years.
All one can hope for is that in the next election in Japan, the anti nuke guys win.... I have a feeling that they will use Fukushima as their poster child for NPP's and the truth may finally be known.
Freelance TV and radio commentator Peter Barakan said he was pressured by two broadcast stations to steer clear of nuclear power issues on his programs until after the Tokyo gubernatorial election on Feb. 9, causing concern among some about possible media censorship. Barakan, who hosts the three-hour radio show “Barakan Morning” every Monday through Thursday on InterFM, a private radio station, mentioned the “requests” on his live show Monday but didn’t identify the stations. Nor did he say when or why the requests were made. “I have been told by two stations (other than InterFM) not to touch on the nuclear issue until the gubernatorial election is over, even though the campaign has not officially kicked off,” he said during the show.
Tokyo Electric Power Company is to begin work at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant to stop radioactive wastewater from flowing into the sea.
The task of creating underground frozen walls is due to start at the Number 2 and Number 3 reactors on Wednesday.
In order to produce more nuclear electricity, the nuclear corporations and proponents need you to believe that nuclear power is safe, no one has ever died or become ill from nuclear power accidents, nuclear power will counteract global warming, and it is the cheapest form of power. Listen to Fairewinds’ Arnie Gundersen tell you the truth about these myths.
Maggie and Arnie speak at The Green Mountain Global Forum about the risks of living near one of the twenty-three US nuclear reactors that are identical to the four that exploded at Fukushima Daiichi (Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactors). The “Lake Wobegone” effect (where each community thinks their nuclear plant is better than average) convinces the 23 local communities in which there is a Mark 1 BWR that a nuclear accident couldn’t possibly happen at their nuclear reactor. The experiences at Fukushima Daiichi, Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, prove that faith in nuclear safety is unfounded.
More than two years since the nuclear disaster began at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors, its impact is massive and widespread. It will be decades before the full scope of the impacts of this ongoing disaster is fully understood but significant health, economic, environmental and social consequences are already evident and quantifiable.
With concern among the public over the plume of radioactive ocean water from Fukushima arriving on the West Coast of North America and no U.S. government or international plan to monitor it, a new project from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) is filling a timely information gap. Through ‘How Radioactive Is Our Ocean,’ the public can support the monitoring of radiation in the ocean with tax-deductible donations to fund the analysis of collected seawater samples or by proposing new locations and funding the samples and analysis of those sites at Ken Buesseler’s lab in Woods Hole.
Just two weeks after launching the crowd sourcing campaign and citizen science website, ‘How Radioactive Is Our Ocean,’ WHOI marine chemist Ken Buesseler’s project has received more than 70 individual donations from the concerned public. New data on seawater radiation levels will be posted on the website today.
.....
Although Buesseler does not expect levels to be dangerously high in the ocean or in seafood as the plume spreads 5,000 miles across the Pacific, he believes this is an evolving situation that demands careful, consistent monitoring to make sure predictions are true.
...
Fukushima contamination can be fingerprinted from precise measurements of the relative amounts of two cesium isotopes: The long lived cesium-137 isotope with a 30-year half life that has been in the ocean from 1960s weapons testing, and cesium-134, with a 2-year half life that can only be a result of the more recent 2011 Fukushima accident. Today new data will be posted on the website from four funded sample sites: La Jolla, Calif., Point Reyes, Calif., Grayland, WA, and Sequim Bay, WA.
No traces of Fukushima’s cesium-134 have been detected in Buesseler’s analyses yet. And, the level of cesium-137 is what's expected from the 1960s sources (1.5 Bequerels per cubic metre).
January 28, 2014
The first results from seawater samples come from La Jolla and Point Reyes, Calif., and Grayland and Squium, Wash. Four samples from these three locations show no detectable Fukushima cesium. We know this because Fukushima released equal amounts of two isotopes of cesium: the shorter-lived cesium-134 isotope (half-life of 2 years) and the longer-lived cesium-137 (half-life of 30 years). Cesium-137 was found at levels of 1.5 Bq per cubic meter (Bq/m3), but this was already detectable prior to releases at Fukushima and came primarily from nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific during the 1950s and 1960s.
This so-called "negative" result has two immediate implications. First there should be no health concerns associated with swimming in the ocean as a result of Fukushima contaminants by themselves or as a result of any additional, low-level radioactive dose received from existing human and natural sources of radiation in the ocean (existing levels of cesium-137 are hundreds of times less than the dose provided by naturally occurring potassium-40 in seawater).
Secondly, and just as important from a scientific perspective, the results provide a key baseline from the West Coast prior to the arrival of the Fukushima plume. Models of ocean currents and cesium transport predict that the plume will arrive along the northern sections of the North American Pacific Coast (Alaska and northern British Columbia) sometime in the spring of 2014 and will arrive along the Washington, Oregon, and California coastline over the coming one to two years.
The timing and pattern of dispersal underscores the need for samples further to the north, and for additional samples to be collected every few months at sites up and down the coast.
- See more at: www.ourradioactiveocean.org...
Human0815
reply to post by wishes
It seams like that you don't understand the meaning of Censorship!
Fukushima-Daiichi is a Nuclear Powerstation, not a Kindergarten.
Nuclear Power Stations are under specific Laws,
the Access is strongly regulated and the publication of Data,
Pictures or Videos need to follow Rules.
You can't go to any nuclear Plant in the whole World and do your own thing,
not even in the most free Country.
Until now it was open only to a limited Circle of national
and international Institutes and Companies but soon they
will be more accessible to private Organizations.
"Everything need Time and starts with a E"!
Regarding the Wall:
Do you know the Construction Planning?
Because i think you are without a imagination
of the Size of this Walls,
please visit the friendly Tepco Site and open up your Mind!
And study Earthquakes too.