My name is Tom Carey, and I have spent the past 22 years researching the Roswell incident. Ask me an

TomCarey
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

The author should have concentrated on Area 51 and stayed with it. It was a decent history of the secret base. But she strayed into the Roswell thickit and told an unbelievable story based upon a tale by a single source. She didn't know enough about the case to detect BS when she heard it.

With the gratest respect tom,

That does not adequately answer the question a visit from ET is just as unbelievable as the Russian mutant theory.

The theory that she proposes does have just as much credibility as ET. Can you provide any information that would "debunk" her claims

reply to post by dustytoad


1. Wow. I don't know how you can tell if I'm really me. Check my picture against that on my websire, www.roswellinvestigator.com. Asl me anything based on what you see there? I don't know.

2. "Extraterriestrial" craft means one that was manufactured off-planet and presumably piloted by someone or something born, manufactured, etc. off-planet.

3. People today are much more accepting that there is other life in the universe. So, I don't think it would matter who finally confirmed that fact. But there would definiely be anger directed at our government for lying to us all these years.

reply to post by Blue Shift
I agree with you on that point,it still is all speculation and maybes,no definite answer to anything about Roswell are any other downed alien craft,we can sit here and asked questions till we are blue in the face and still what are we left with no definite proof,I want solid hard evidence that Roswell and other crashes did happen

reply to post by TomCarey


Do you know what happened to the nurse who disappeared and the surviving alien from Roswell, was the alien looked after properly and did he or she ever get to go home ?
Thank you.

Hello, and welcome, sir.
Is there any truth to the story actor Jackie Gleason tells of having visited the alien morgue containing bodies from the Roswell crash?

Mr Tom

I've always been intrigued by the Egyptian connection ala the hieroglyphics found on the "beams" of surprisingly light weight and strong material.

Have they been decoded or deciphered?

And how about those "Men in Black"?

reply to post by restlessinMT


For me, it's hard to pick out one witness or fact that was most important. I dould probably name of few, but even those would be incomplete.

1. Colonel Edwin Easley on his deathbed when asked about Roswell by his grandaughter could only respond, "Ohhh .... the creatures."
2. The number of witnesses who saw the crash wreckage being driven right down Main Street [Roswell] in broad daylight to the base.
3. The number of witnesses who were threatened with their lives and the lives of their children to remain silent.
4. The crew members on the flights that flew the little bodies out of Roswell after the recovery.
5. The opening of Walter Haut's sealed staement of what he knew about what took place. [he was the base PIO].

reply to post by TomCarey


This may have been asked before, not sure, but how do you feel about COL. Philip J. Corso and his book?

Tom, do you know of any witnesses that told you or another investigator of being hassled by unknown persons, they or their children, in any way shape or from even years after the event? I am talking about any sort of thing they felt was directly related to them being a witness? Did you ever know of anyone that claimed they were blackmailed or otherwise destroyed by any subterfuge, victims of unfortunate events? I am talking about real world stuff here not paranormal.


Ok I just read your above for one point.

Hi Tom,

One of the few Roswell stories to be printed in the early 1950s comes from British TV presenter, Hughie Green. He was travelling by car from Hollywood to Philadelphia during the summer of 1947. Tuning in to various radio stations on the trip he heard a number of broadcasts confirming a "craft" had come down at a location called Tucumcari (miles from Corona or the Brazel ranch) and that the army were moving. Arriving in Philadelphia he found no newspapers carried the story and the radio stations all denied any knowledge

Do you know anything more about this story?

reply to post by TomCarey


Hello Tom and thank you for coming to ATS to answer our questions. The "Roswell Incident" is what got me into the whole UFO subject.

My questions are pretty straight forward.

1. Was there any material left over from the crash site that the military didn't take away or confiscate? I.E did any witnesses have any that you know of?
2. Do you know where the military shipped the material after the crash?

Thanks and looking forward to your response.

-SAP-

reply to post by SonOfTheLawOfOne


1. At this point, with over 600 witnesses forming the pieces to a puzzle that spells " Roswell was extraterrestrial," there isn't anything out there that I can see that would cause me to reconsider. Maybe there is, but I don't see it rightnow. There have been numerous Roswell "theories of the month," but they all have fallen apart like Philadelphia sports teams when looked at in detail.

Hello Tom, I've found Roswell to be rather fascinating, but personally believe whatever crashed there no matter how exotic it seemed in 1947 or even by the technological envelope of today to be man made.

My thoughts are based on the following presumptions, The descriptions of the wreckage as Aluminium type substrates or foil like materials, "I" beams and masses of cabling do not sound like the type of advanced technology that a space fairing species would build from. If a ET vessel crashed here surely its technological envelope would be so advanced compared to our understanding that we would have simply no idea what we were looking at, it would like giving an Ipad to an ant?

The whole account of body recovery seems dubious to me, no matter how advanced a species is it would still take considerable amount of time and energy, especially energy to traverse space/time to reach here, wouldn't any advance race surely send drones/ A.I or robotic devices. If they(ET) had the technological prowess to reach Earth from where ever in our Galaxy or further beyond, surely their or equivalent A.I would be of a level greater than we could possibly comprehend?

And finally I find it hard to believe that this object could have travelled impossible to comprehend distances to have a critical malfunction and subsequent crash in all places America/Earth!

Another thing that has bugged me about the whole UFO debate is that virtually all the photographic evidence be that fake or unexplained kind of looks like the styling direction of the particular decade it was taken in, whats your views on this?

Is it possible that our own understanding of the technological envelope is far greater than the general populous is lead to believe, I point you to Nazi Germany, and Roy McFadden of the RAF that is quoted as saying if the war had continued another 6 months the outcome based on the remarkable advancements he had witnessed at the end of the war, there could have had a very different outcome.

What is your opinion on the affadavit signed by ms Sleppy?

Originally posted by TomCarey
reply to post by Zanti Misfit

 

Good question. We have over the years investigated every possibility e.g., a V2 rocket, fighter planes, experimental aircraft such as the Chance-Vaught "Flying Flapjack" and the Norhtrup "Flying Wing" and have come up empty. The Air Force also did the same in its 1993-1997 re-examination of the Roswell case and also came up empty for alternative explanations of Roswell, save for the rediculous "roject Mogul and anthropomorphic dummies "explanations."

So , have you come to the belief after all your research into this matter that indeed, the Unsubstantiated Evidence does point to an extraterestrial craft crashing into the N.W. desert in 1947 ?

reply to post by SonOfTheLawOfOne


There were good reasons for Roswell being covered-up in 1947. Now those reasons are no longer operative in today's world, I believe that Roswell is still being covered-up mostly due to inertia - it's always been cover-up, so let's not change anything unless we absolutely have to. It also might be due to the case that we still don't have a handle on everything as to what made it tick, and till we do, well ... let' not admit it. There still might be a remnant, latent fear of "panic in the streets" and a collapse of our financial and religeous institutions.

Originally posted by TomCarey
reply to post by SonOfTheLawOfOne

 

1. At this point, with over 600 witnesses forming the pieces to a puzzle that spells " Roswell was extraterrestrial," there isn't anything out there that I can see that would cause me to reconsider. Maybe there is, but I don't see it rightnow. There have been numerous Roswell "theories of the month," but they all have fallen apart like Philadelphia sports teams when looked at in detail.

"Like a Philadelphia sports teams "
good one

reply to post by TLomon


My best guess would be Nitinol. Another researcher by the name of Anthony Bragalia has done a lot of work on this and has pursuaded me that Nitinol was back-engineered from the so-called "memory-metal" found amongst the Roswell crash debris.

Mr.Carey since you have investigated Roswell for so long what is your opinion on the Roswell Alien Autopsy Film,do you believe it is real are faked

Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin

TomCarey
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

The author should have concentrated on Area 51 and stayed with it. It was a decent history of the secret base. But she strayed into the Roswell thickit and told an unbelievable story based upon a tale by a single source. She didn't know enough about the case to detect BS when she heard it.

With the gratest respect tom,

That does not adequately answer the question a visit from ET is just as unbelievable as the Russian mutant theory.

The theory that she proposes does have just as much credibility as ET. Can you provide any information that would "debunk" her claims

edit on 3-9-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)

I know you're looking for an answer from Tom but I'll just chime in my two cents here, I know it's ego but I spent some time with the book you are referencing.

Annie Jacobsen claims the Russians had the technology in 1947 to send a stealth saucer halfway across the US, which was not detected by any US radars, presumably from Russia or some other far flung base, with all the implied stealth, long-range and anti-gravity technology that implies - yet continued to copy US aircraft and lag the US technologically for the next half-century? You cannot see the logical flaw here?

Also, the claims that the bodies were genetic mutations? (I'm sure you've seen pictures of Greys, I don't think any human could survive that surgery - so the surgery angle is ridiculous.) A mutation is random by definition so each body would have looked completely different. And the Russians would do this and chance it being exposed to the world? Again, too many logical inconsistencies, the alien grays and a crashed disc are much easier to believe.

When everything else has been ruled out, and only the impossible remains............the impossible becomes the probable.