It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lack of empirical distinguishability does not imply that magic is merely sufficiently advanced technology.
This non sequitur may be what proponents of scientism would like to believe, and it is superficially attractive for their general purpose of always denying all non-physical causes of phenomena.
But it still begs the question posed by the OP instead of answering it. Technology involves natural causes and their effects. It's what scientists study. Magic, on the other hand, by definition requires the temporary suspension of objective causation according to the laws of nature through the intervention, aided by the imagination and ritual, of the human will, which can act unrestricted by the laws of physics.
It is not even adequate to fantasize that magic is merely future science. That's still an intellectual cop-out, for it implicity assumes that the human mind cannot act at a distance on matter, so that true magic cannot exist.
The quantum mind or quantum consciousness hypothesis proposes that classical mechanics CANNOT EXPLAIN consciousness, while quantum mechanical phenomena, such as quantum entanglement and superposition, may play an important part in the brain's function, and could form the basis of an explanation of consciousness.
Quantum physics has proven that all matter at the subatomic level exists in wave form, and that matter only appears solid when we, as the observer, use our senses to decode and perceive the wave patterns in space and time. Significantly, thoughts, especially concentrated thoughts, also form measurable wave patterns. And thought waves have proven to affect observable matter in the physical world.
But, any honest attempt to answer the question: what is magic? cannot dismiss it by falling back on this assumption as though it is were an unquestionable article of religious faith. Some of us have moved beyond dogmatic science.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Magic is the idea of a non-existent power to change real things outside your own body with will alone.
edit on 1-9-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AsarAlubat
I'd say science yet to be explained.
-AA
is the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will. Every intentional act is a magickal act.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Phage
The difference being, of course, there is no such thing as magic.
Magick is only non-existent in your narrow minded view or understanding of magic.edit on 1-9-2013 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wandering Scribe
reply to post by NewAgeMan
I'm with Crowley and the Thelemites on this one. Paraphrased, Crowley stated that magick:
is the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will. Every intentional act is a magickal act.
~ Wandering Scribe
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
Magick is the art of inducing change in conformity with the will. This can be interpreted and used in a number of different ways.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Magic is the idea of a non-existent power to change real things outside your own body with will alone
Originally posted by RedCairo
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Magic is the idea of a non-existent power to change real things outside your own body with will alone
I think that's a bit superstitious, I don't know any magick practitioners who think that.
Originally posted by bowtomonkey
To reach the highest pinnacle in magic is to be fully present to the moment, now. To understand that aside from 'now' past and present are not defined.
Originally posted by eso322
reply to post by NewAgeMan
Altight new age man. Would love your word on the subject. I feel extremely left out...