It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muse7
Sorry but the only ones waging war are Assad and his thugs launching chemical weapons into the neighborhoods of Damascus, killing over a thousand people and killing 400+ innocent children.
Launching strikes to destroy these Chemical weapons is the right thing to do in my opinion and I'm glad Obama is taking it to Congress to seek approval. The U.N is basically useless as Russia and China are on the security council and will not allow any resolution that does not include Assad getting away with murder.
We have the means necessary to prevent more mass killings of civilians in this fashion.
The ability to stop evil but not willing is malevolent.edit on 8/31/2013 by muse7 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
reply to post by muse7
You think that its only Assad with these kinds of weapons? The extremists and the anti government people have them too. Probably AQ as well. The last thing we need to do is go marching in and backing crazy people into a corner. God only knows what their capable of.
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
reply to post by muse7
You think that its only Assad with these kinds of weapons? The extremists and the anti government people have them too. Probably AQ as well. The last thing we need to do is go marching in and backing crazy people into a corner. God only knows what their capable of.
No Assad is not the only one that has these kinds of weapons, but he has shown that he is not afraid to use them so why not destroy them? Why not prevent more of these attacks to take place? And if we do attack these weapons and he decides to make another attack on innocent civilians then the U.N and NATO will be forced to take action to finally take him out.
Originally posted by benrl
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
reply to post by muse7
You think that its only Assad with these kinds of weapons? The extremists and the anti government people have them too. Probably AQ as well. The last thing we need to do is go marching in and backing crazy people into a corner. God only knows what their capable of.
No Assad is not the only one that has these kinds of weapons, but he has shown that he is not afraid to use them so why not destroy them? Why not prevent more of these attacks to take place? And if we do attack these weapons and he decides to make another attack on innocent civilians then the U.N and NATO will be forced to take action to finally take him out.
And than Iran and Russia enter the fray... Yea that will end well for us...
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by benrl
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
reply to post by muse7
You think that its only Assad with these kinds of weapons? The extremists and the anti government people have them too. Probably AQ as well. The last thing we need to do is go marching in and backing crazy people into a corner. God only knows what their capable of.
No Assad is not the only one that has these kinds of weapons, but he has shown that he is not afraid to use them so why not destroy them? Why not prevent more of these attacks to take place? And if we do attack these weapons and he decides to make another attack on innocent civilians then the U.N and NATO will be forced to take action to finally take him out.
And than Iran and Russia enter the fray... Yea that will end well for us...
You think Russia and Iran are stupid enough to commit suicide over Syria?
The PR transmissions will resume,
They'll try to push drugs that keep us all dumbed down,
And hope that we will never see the truth around
(So come on)
Another promise, another scene,
Another packaged lie to keep us trapped in greed,
And all the green belts wrapped around our minds,
And endless red tape to keep the truth confined
Originally posted by whyamIhere
100,000 are dead in Syria.
Roughly 1400 by chemical weapons.
I wonder if any of the dead give a crap about the method?
Our logic seems to be the Regime must be punished. What is the punishment?
We are going to kill some of your people to protest you killing your people.
If I have it wrong....Let me know.
Originally posted by whyamIhere
100,000 are dead in Syria.
Roughly 1400 by chemical weapons.
I wonder if any of the dead give a crap about the method?
Our logic seems to be the Regime must be punished. What is the punishment?
We are going to kill some of your people to protest you killing your people.
If I have it wrong....Let me know.
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by whyamIhere
100,000 are dead in Syria.
Roughly 1400 by chemical weapons.
I wonder if any of the dead give a crap about the method?
Our logic seems to be the Regime must be punished. What is the punishment?
We are going to kill some of your people to protest you killing your people.
If I have it wrong....Let me know.
You do have it wrong
They're not carpet bombing the place, this wont turn into another Nurnberg
They're launching Tomahawk missiles with specific targets programmed into their system. These targets might include weapons cache's, missiles, and other type of weaponry.
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by whyamIhere
100,000 are dead in Syria.
Roughly 1400 by chemical weapons.
I wonder if any of the dead give a crap about the method?
Our logic seems to be the Regime must be punished. What is the punishment?
We are going to kill some of your people to protest you killing your people.
If I have it wrong....Let me know.
You do have it wrong
They're not carpet bombing the place, this wont turn into another Nurnberg
They're launching Tomahawk missiles with specific targets programmed into their system. These targets might include weapons cache's, missiles, and other type of weaponry.