It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xMJRx
All jokes aside, and in my opinion, wouldn't it be better to heavily pollute Mars before we start to colonise it, terraforming Mars could be possibly achieved in just a decade or two by burning tonnes of fossil fuels via several factory units built here on earth and then sent to different parts of Mars to do there work, they would be like those pods in the pic on SkyNews, possibly bigger though, but when one pre filled pod is empty of fossil fuel another would be sent to take over, after a few decades we could possibly go there and start to dismantle these pods because the pods would then have done there work and provided us with the atmosphere we would need to sustain life, from there plants could grow, oxygen would be made, the planet would warm up, ice would melt providing oceans, and the atmosphere would grow strong, we could all go there without fear of suffocation, we could go and live there in the open and establish new beginnings, its completely possible to do this, expensive but would be worth every penny to achieve, unfortunately under current plans it doesn't look like thats the plan so it will not happen for a very, very, very long time, instead we will go there and struggle to survive by relying on pods to sustain us, that just makes no sense to me, if your going to do it, do it properly.
If that was the plan then i would sign up straight away, but living in a pod for years is just not attractive to me.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by xMJRx
All jokes aside, and in my opinion, wouldn't it be better to heavily pollute Mars before we start to colonise it, terraforming Mars could be possibly achieved in just a decade or two by burning tonnes of fossil fuels via several factory units built here on earth and then sent to different parts of Mars to do there work, they would be like those pods in the pic on SkyNews, possibly bigger though, but when one pre filled pod is empty of fossil fuel another would be sent to take over, after a few decades we could possibly go there and start to dismantle these pods because the pods would then have done there work and provided us with the atmosphere we would need to sustain life, from there plants could grow, oxygen would be made, the planet would warm up, ice would melt providing oceans, and the atmosphere would grow strong, we could all go there without fear of suffocation, we could go and live there in the open and establish new beginnings, its completely possible to do this, expensive but would be worth every penny to achieve, unfortunately under current plans it doesn't look like thats the plan so it will not happen for a very, very, very long time, instead we will go there and struggle to survive by relying on pods to sustain us, that just makes no sense to me, if your going to do it, do it properly.
If that was the plan then i would sign up straight away, but living in a pod for years is just not attractive to me.
Not to sound condescending, but you have no clue what you are talking about. It's 100% impossible to do what you suggested. Mars can not hold an atmosphere. The only hope would be to jumpstart the core in the hopes it would create a magnetosphere to protect any forming atmosphere.
Over 200,000 apply to live on Mars
The first round of the Mars One application process has now closed. In the 5 month application period, Mars One received interest from 202,586 people from over 140 countries, wanting to be amongst the first human settlers on Mars. Applicants will be notified of the desicion on their application by the end of this year.
The screening of the astronaut applications will be done by the Mars One Selection Committee, led by Norbert Kraft, M.D., Chief Medical Officer of Mars One. He has over 19 years of experience in aerospace research and development. His primary area of expertise is developing physiological and psychological countermeasures to combat the negative effects of long-duration spaceflight. Recently Dr. Kraft received the "NASA Group Achievement Award 2013", one of the most prestigious awards a group can receive.