It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to one CNN reader, "Warning! The Communist News Network is deleting popular comments again. (Well popular with readers, but not popular with their state run agenda) ."
Impermium's new service goes even further: The company claims to have developed a technology to “identify not only spam and malicious links, but all kinds of harmful content—such as violence, racism, flagrant profanity, and hate speech—and allows site owners to act on it in real-time, before it reaches readers.” It says it has 300,000 websites as clients (which is not all that surprising, if it's incorporated into widely used third-party tools like Disqus). As far as intermediaries go, this sounds very impressive: a single Californian company making decisions over what counts as hate speech and profanity for some of the world's most popular sites without anyone ever examining whether its own algorithms might be biased or excessively conservative.
Sameer Bhalotra Sameer is COO of Impermium.
Previously he served as White House Senior Director for Cybersecurity where he presented strategic options to the President regarding the nation's top priority cybersecurity initiatives
Originally posted by JanAmosComenius
This is wet dream of censors. Problem with internet discussions solved: post is trashed before it reaches even one person from potential audience with no need of expensive and slow moderators. If this technology will prevail we should return to chalk and spray
BTW I was really surprised that almost all posts under propaganda piece in Czech Rep. most visited news site idnes.cz regarding Syria were sane in sense of common sense. It is encouraging that usually sheeplish discussants react with big disgrace to such blatant propaganda piece. I'm afraid that idnes.cz is contacting sales representative of that drone censor company just now.
Originally posted by jimmyx
.c'mon....there is censorship here on ATS....and let's not forget "commenters" can lie, too. CNN owns their site, just like FOX news owns their site, just like RT news, and just like Al Jazeera....they all could lie, especially if the majority of their audience would trust what they say, and not double check the source.
Originally posted by jimmyx
.c'mon....there is censorship here on ATS.....
Should U.S. NOT go to war? NOT attack Syria?
Instead round Miley Cyrus & the Biebs and air drop them to the Syrian people.
Yes ↑ No: ↓
313 10
Can we drop the Kardashians on Syria, too?
131 2
Hopefully the drop includes Lamar Odom and Kanye.
44
Originally posted by jimmyx
.c'mon....there is censorship here on ATS....and let's not forget "commenters" can lie, too. CNN owns their site, just like FOX news owns their site, just like RT news, and just like Al Jazeera....they all could lie, especially if the majority of their audience would trust what they say, and not double check the source.
Doctors without borders already on the ground in Syria said almost 300 people died in latest chemical attack. US "experts" say 1400 died.
Oh... that is right... those rebel terrorists have nine lives. One of them getting killed will count as nine deaths. So the math goes like this:
138 rebel deaths = 138 x 9 = 1242
158 civilian deaths = 158 x 1 = 158
Total number of deaths = 138 + 158 = 296 (according to doctors)
Total number of deaths = 1242 + 158 = 1400 (according to US experts)