It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheEthicalSkeptic
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
reply to post by Phage
I think it's noise.
Makes sense.
I have a $79 Kodak digital camera which never produces noise like this. And the data, transmits via an ANSI protocol that makes sure all the pixels transmit to the PC correctly.
I will send both my camera and its pic manager download software to NASA for the next rover mission.
Good catch.
Originally posted by Jchristopher5
I will be honest, Scott Waring and his UFO website are a little too much for me sometimes, and I am a UFO believer. Sometimes it seems he touts images that are questionable at best.
Originally posted by Phage
The rear Hazcam takes stereo images, two shots simultaneously.
Here are the two images. (Seems to be a white UFO on the wheel assembly)
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...edit on 8/25/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)edit on 8/25/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by filledcup
id say it was swamp gas.. but there arent any swamps on mars are there?
Originally posted by Saltron
It could be a weather balloon or swamp gas :-P
Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist
Originally posted by filledcup
id say it was swamp gas.. but there arent any swamps on mars are there?
Originally posted by Saltron
It could be a weather balloon or swamp gas :-P
Don't be that "swamp gas guy".
The "swamp gas comment" and other horrible one liners
you know what grinds my gears?....."swamp gas" guy
Originally posted by Jchristopher5
I will be honest, Scott Waring and his UFO website are a little too much for me sometimes, and I am a UFO believer. Sometimes it seems he touts images that are questionable at best. However, this one is an exception, IMO.
Assuming the rovers are actually on Mars (which I do) this is a very interesting image. Disk-shaped objects, on Mars, photographed in two different images. I can't buy that its a photographic artifact, but try to convince me otherwise.
You can also link to the original JPL photos at Scott Waring's site/ link below for more information.
UFO Sightings Daily
edit on 25-8-2013 by Jchristopher5 because: (no reason given)edit on 25-8-2013 by Jchristopher5 because: More concise title
Originally posted by Demoncreeper
one was pointed out on this pic from an older thread. see if you can spot the dot! haha.
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...edit on 25-8-2013 by Demoncreeper because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Urantia1111
I know a lot of people don't want these to be pictures of flying machines, but that doesn't mean they aren't. Good catch if you ask me. The "dust particle" theory is (always) a cop-out imo.
Or maybe we're just looking at some dust on the lens of the rover's camera and enlarging it with bicubic interpolation is giving it a flying saucer shape. But that would be totally crazy, right guys?