It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Unity_99
Stealthbomber
reply to post by Unity_99
Yeah it could be, MK-Ultra still plays havoc with my brain
But yeah find the degree and come back and post it, I'll just wait here for it
I don't have to find any degree. That man, he is a big wings credentialed person who is not a imbecile. If someone of his credentials says Bob Lazar is for real, please don't keep on with your program, because between him and you, he won.
gariac
amazing
My stance remains the same. There are too many anomalies in Lazar's circumstances to just say..."he's debunked".
The analogy would be to say that there are some holes and things in the Theory of Evolution therefore evolution is bunk. We know that's not the case, and it's, again, not that simple in Lazar's case either.
Just editing to add that one degree doesn't mean squat in this case. That's like saying, we're missing one fossil so evolution isn't true.edit on 22-2-2014 by amazing because: (no reason given)
The theory or evolution is based on evidence. The theory of Bob Lazar is based on Bob Lazar. ;-)
It would help Lazar's story if he could come up with one piece of physical evidence. Remember he showed George Knapp what he claimed to be a piece of element 115.
amazing
gariac
amazing
My stance remains the same. There are too many anomalies in Lazar's circumstances to just say..."he's debunked".
The analogy would be to say that there are some holes and things in the Theory of Evolution therefore evolution is bunk. We know that's not the case, and it's, again, not that simple in Lazar's case either.
Just editing to add that one degree doesn't mean squat in this case. That's like saying, we're missing one fossil so evolution isn't true.edit on 22-2-2014 by amazing because: (no reason given)
The theory or evolution is based on evidence. The theory of Bob Lazar is based on Bob Lazar. ;-)
It would help Lazar's story if he could come up with one piece of physical evidence. Remember he showed George Knapp what he claimed to be a piece of element 115.
Remember too, that we have proof he worked at Los Alamos, despite government claims to the contrary. That should bring up some red flags, and add something to the story. You can't just stop there. Why would the government deny that Bob Lazar worked for them and hide the evidence? We found the internal phone list, listing Bob Lazar. It's these kinds of things, this kind of evidence that should make you look a little further and see that something is not adding up. And not in the way you are saying.
gariac
amazing
gariac
amazing
My stance remains the same. There are too many anomalies in Lazar's circumstances to just say..."he's debunked".
The analogy would be to say that there are some holes and things in the Theory of Evolution therefore evolution is bunk. We know that's not the case, and it's, again, not that simple in Lazar's case either.
Just editing to add that one degree doesn't mean squat in this case. That's like saying, we're missing one fossil so evolution isn't true.edit on 22-2-2014 by amazing because: (no reason given)
The theory or evolution is based on evidence. The theory of Bob Lazar is based on Bob Lazar. ;-)
It would help Lazar's story if he could come up with one piece of physical evidence. Remember he showed George Knapp what he claimed to be a piece of element 115.
Remember too, that we have proof he worked at Los Alamos, despite government claims to the contrary. That should bring up some red flags, and add something to the story. You can't just stop there. Why would the government deny that Bob Lazar worked for them and hide the evidence? We found the internal phone list, listing Bob Lazar. It's these kinds of things, this kind of evidence that should make you look a little further and see that something is not adding up. And not in the way you are saying.
Lazar never worked directly at LANL. He was a Kirk-Mayer contract employee. There was no cover up.
Snowden never worked at the NSA. He was there as a Booz-Allen contractor.
If you are into this stuff, the feds/mil use color coded badges so you can tell what the status is of various workers. You even get different common access cards (CAC) depending on your status. When the press says Snowden tricked other workers into providing "credentials", they probably mean he got someone to provide their CAC.
Now this gets me thinking. After Snowden went public, the feds did their obligatory notice that he is not allowed to bid on or work on government contracts. It is a necessary step since not everyone who leaked information is as well known. Nobody ever produced such a document regarding Lazar because he never leaked any information. Rather he just made stuff up.
edit on 23-2-2014 by gariac because: (no reason given)
R_Clark
and endless supply of nonsense from the peanut crew like Stanton.. so if he is debunking Lazar.. then Lazar is likely truthful... Please listen to several of the Douglas Dietrich historical reports for a third view..
Unity_99
Stealthbomber
reply to post by Unity_99
Yeah it could be, MK-Ultra still plays havoc with my brain
But yeah find the degree and come back and post it, I'll just wait here for it
I don't have to find any degree. That man, he is a big wings credentialed person who is not a imbecile. If someone of his credentials says Bob Lazar is for real, please don't keep on with your program, because between him and you, he won.
originally posted by: waltwillis
Debunk this!
Andy has been identified as the first of two “planetary-level whistle blowers”
Andy was identified in early childhood as an “Indigo” child
originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: hellobruce
You are feeding the troll. The post was simply to plug this guy's book. Mission accomplished unless the moderator deletes the messages.
This has nothing to do with Bob Lazar.
originally posted by: waltwillis
originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: hellobruce
You are feeding the troll. The post was simply to plug this guy's book. Mission accomplished unless the moderator deletes the messages.
This has nothing to do with Bob Lazar.
WHAT BOOK?
originally posted by: gariac
originally posted by: waltwillis
originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: hellobruce
You are feeding the troll. The post was simply to plug this guy's book. Mission accomplished unless the moderator deletes the messages.
This has nothing to do with Bob Lazar.
WHAT BOOK?
Re-read your spam. It mentions the "tell all" book.
originally posted by: waltwillis
WHAT BOOK?
originally posted by: waltwillis
Bob Lazar and others have been debunked by some folks here on this forum and that question of bob Lazar not telling the truth is how we can make the connection of other people like Bob that are being called liars.
Get it? The pseudo skeptics have no bounds when it comes to calling others a liar.
They also suggest that the folks giving reports about seeing aliens as needing a mental exam at times as well.
I'll keep looking to the sky as you look into the mirror.
originally posted by: waltwillis
If John Lear says Bob is telling the truth then I believe he is telling the truth.