It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At the end of the day when people cry about equality what they really mean is
"If someone is ahead of me they should either be held down so they are equal with me or I should be given some advantage so that I am equal with them."
When you look at it objectively many of these affirmative action things and all the equality crap is just as if not more racist than the original problem they were trying to solve.
Think about it, lets say a black guy does not get good enough grades to make it into a university but gets in to fill some race quota they have. All that really says is " Here was are going to let you in anyways because in reviewing your application we see that you did not make the proper grade requirements BUT since you are not white we know you can't help your poor performance so welcome to the university".
Now don't get me wrong, i hold no ill will to those who get jobs and education based off their skin color, they have to look out for themselves just as I would if i were offered something. But this whole system of separating people by race for things like jobs and education has to go. If you go out camping and ants raid and eat all your food, do you get mad at the ants for eating it or do you tell the wife to put things away so the ants don't get them?
Affirmative Action primarily benefits white women says
conservative female author
"I regard affirmative action as pernicious — a system that had
wonderful ideals when it started but was almost immediately
abused for the benefit of white middle-class women. And the
number one sign of it is in the universities. The elite schools
were destroyed by affirmative action for women, not for
blacks."
--Author/lecturer Prof. Camille Paglia
FROM NY TIMES ARTICLE- CITING US DEPT OF
LABOR STUDIES
Reverse-discrimination claims fell into two categories:
individual decisions in which a white man asserted that he
would have been hired for a job had he been black or female,
and cases that claimed programs or plans unfairly favored
women and minorities.
“Many of the cases were the result of a disappointed applicant
failing to examine his or her own qualifications,” Mr.
Blumrosen wrote, “and erroneously assuming that when a
woman or minority got the job, it was because of race or sex,
not qualifications.
Affirmative action has caused very few claims of reverse
discrimination by white people, according to a draft of a report
prepared by the Labor Department. The author says his findings
poke holes in the theory that affirmative-action programs
unfairly benefit minorities at the expense of white workers.
The report, prepared by a law professor at Rutgers University,
Alfred W. Blumrosen, found fewer than 100
reverse-discrimination cases among more than 3,000
discrimination opinions by Federal district and appeals courts
from 1990 to 1994.
A "high proportion" of the reverse-discrimination claims lacked
merit, the review found. Reverse discrimination was
established in six cases, and the courts provided appropriate
relief in those cases, it said.
www.nytimes.com...
This history has been told before, but Katznelson offers a penetrating new analysis, supported by vivid examples and statistics. He examines closely how the federal government discriminated against black citizens as it created and administered the sweeping social programs that provided the vital framework for a vibrant and secure American middle class. Considered revolutionary at the time, the new legislation included the Social Security system, unemployment compensation, the minimum wage, protection of the right of workers to join labor unions and the G.I. Bill of Rights.
Even though blacks benefited to a degree from many of these programs, Katznelson shows how and why they received far less assistance than whites did. He documents the political process by which powerful Southern Congressional barons shaped the programs in discriminatory ways -- as their price for supporting them. (A black newspaper editorial criticized Roosevelt for excluding from the minimum wage law the black women who worked long hours for $4.50 a week at the resort the president frequented in Warm Springs, Ga.)
www.nytimes.com...
The facts are you black never invented a wheel, nor had your own written language and are without much of a history other than what the white man has recorded. You were not Egyptian gods or any other kind of gods. You are, were and always have been the absolute scum of the earth and on the bottom of the pile of the nearest septic tank.
Originally posted by LizardSlicks
reply to post by pavil
Somebody was murdered. Justice is being served. Violence, especially of this type where more or less random and completely innocent people are the victims, is probably the worst thing there is. Rest in peace Chris Lane. It is disrespectful to turn something about his murder into a platform to speak broadly about unsubstantiated theories on a national level. I have realized that and hope others do too.
Latessss.edit on 26-8-2013 by LizardSlicks because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by maybee
It's also sad that some reports of Australians suggesting a boycott of visiting the US.
Issues concerning economic Justice,very well how did we get here in the first place as with welfare there is almost universal belief that Blacks are the primary benefactors of it,true blacks are the poster children for such especially since it was ostensibly created for them but the reality is White Females are primary the affirmative action gainers.
But if you look at the actual numbers on a per capita basis and take into account the fact that blacks only make up about 10% of the population it is indeed blacks who benefit the most from welfare. And welfare just really proves my point, its a handout to make someone "equal".