It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
There isn't a lot left that can be done. Letting it burn away is one option....not a good one at that.
They can remove the fuel, but should anything happen during removal they could make the whole thing go critical.
The other side of this coin is, if there is another earthquake and the fuel is uncovered and allowed to burn.
We are in for a real treat, we may live to see the extinction of mankind. I wanted to see mars before i die.
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
they cannot, in any conceivable way, remove all the rods since many are already more than likely without their zirconium shielding. given that estimate on my part as nothing more than a laymen, i would conclude it aint gonna happen without setting off criticality of the other rods and possibly entire reactors since if that happens, there will be no way to maintain cooling on the other reactors any longer.
Originally posted by flipflop
reply to post by goou111
has anyone any idea why the worlds governments are not in talks and making concessions with each other to join up all their forces at least for this one time and flush their political crap down the toilet, until we get this sorted, then they can go back to peashooting their rice particles at each other and becoming annoying in the norm...
this makes a one way ticket to mars very appealing
Originally posted by flipflop
reply to post by goou111
has anyone any idea why the worlds governments are not in talks and making concessions with each other to join up all their forces at least for this one time and flush their political crap down the toilet, until we get this sorted, then they can go back to peashooting their rice particles at each other and becoming annoying in the norm...
this makes a one way ticket to mars very appealing
Originally posted by JeanneDArc
Does anyone know a site or a formula I could look at to convert Becquerels to RADS? I'm trying to get my head around what these numbers mean, as far as exposure effects on living tissues. One book I have at home indicates that you can (rule-of-thumb) divide exposures by 3 to see the effects of radiation on fish vs. mammals, that is the fish will only be affected a 1/3 as much by equivalent exposure as a human being. Thank you.
Originally posted by BobAthome
well they better hurry,,they only have had a couple of years,,too "pool" their resources,,
4 hours ago.
20th August 2013 at 05:41 PM
9.77 miles from Iwaki, Fukushima,
Japan
Magnitude 4.9
largest this month.edit on 20-8-2013 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
Originally posted by BobAthome
well they better hurry,,they only have had a couple of years,,too "pool" their resources,,
4 hours ago.
20th August 2013 at 05:41 PM
9.77 miles from Iwaki, Fukushima,
Japan
Magnitude 4.9
largest this month.edit on 20-8-2013 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)
nice humor there Bob.
I've had help,,
(well since 2011 ,what did u expect?,,
p.s thats me with my hand up,,,duh,,"never volunter", i said.
been a while since i seen you doing the do on old fukushima although i'm sure you been keeping an eye on the watered down reports coming from tepco.
China was "shocked" that Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant was still leaking radioactive water two years after it was destroyed by an earthquake and tsunami, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on Wednesday.
Originally posted by BobAthome
well they better hurry,,they only have had a couple of years,,too "pool" their resources,,
4 hours ago.
20th August 2013 at 05:41 PM
9.77 miles from Iwaki, Fukushima,
Japan
Magnitude 4.9
largest this month.edit on 20-8-2013 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)