Breaking: Diana Death: Police Passed New Information

reply to post by Taggart


Something on the naivety of Diana when marrying Charles, and a good article on the whole saga, giving insight into the happenings that shaped her character and public persona, that perhaps had bearing on her life and it's events.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Who's the Daddy? Hewitt compared with Harry and Prince Charles
www.greatdreams.com...

Harry looks far more like Hewitt than his supposed father.
And, despite the attempts of a few here to pretend otherwise, MANY people think the same.

Originally posted by micpsi
Who's the Daddy? Hewitt compared with Harry and Prince Charles
www.greatdreams.com...

Harry looks far more like Hewitt than his supposed father.
And, despite the attempts of a few here to pretend otherwise, MANY people think the same.

I agree, despite good arguments from both sides he is 'spitting image' of Hewitt.
Teeth, Nose angle, Eye color, hair color, Height and Build.

The one thing I wonder is whether Hewitt was ever threatened or intimidated,
my thoughts are that we'll never know.

reply to post by Taggart


That is nonsense.

For a start, Harry has blue eyes. Whereas Hewitt has amber brown eyes. As well as all the other physical differences in appearance as clearly shown on my post on the previous page.

A very interesting article including similar information that suggests truth to the new information regarding specialist security services involvement.

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Witnesses claim that when the bike was about 15ft in front of the car, there was a fierce flash of white light from the motorbike. The suggestion is that this came from a laser beam carried by the pillion passenger and directed at the car.

The witnesses’ view is that the flash of light blinded Henri Paul temporarily. It was followed by a loud bang as the limousine swerved violently before slamming into the 13th pillar in the tunnel and being reduced to a mass of wrecked metal.

One of those eyewitnesses, a French harbour pilot driving ahead of the Mercedes through the tunnel, watched the scene in his rear-view mirror.

Chillingly, he recalls the black motorbike stopping after the crash and one of the riders jumping off the bike before going to peer in the Mercedes window at the passengers.
The rider, who kept his helmet on, then turned to his compatriot on the bike and gave a gesture used informally in the military (where both arms are crossed over the body and then thrown out straight to each side) to indicate ‘mission accomplished’.

Afterwards, he climbed back on the motorcycle, which raced off out of the tunnel. The riders on the bike, and the vehicle itself, have never been identified.
The harbour pilot, whose wife was with him in the car, has described the horrifying scenario as resembling a ‘terrorist attack’.

reply to post by theabsolutetruth


Why would the pillion rider indicate 'mission accomplished' when it is unanimously accepted that Diana was very much conscious and talking in the immediate aftermath of the car crash? Surely this would indicate that the 'mission' wasn't quite 'accomplished' and Diana was alive?
No-one could have known then that she would subsequently die as a result of injuries sustained.

reply to post by Freeborn


The article suggests that the mission was 'maim' rather than killing, perhaps they considered 'maim' had been accomplished.

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by Taggart

 

That is nonsense.

For a start, Harry has blue eyes. Whereas Hewitt has amber brown eyes. As well as all the other physical differences in appearance as clearly shown on my post on the previous page.

edit on 1-9-2013 by theabsolutetruth because: (no reason given)

You miss the point. One does not necessarily inherit the same coloured eyes. What is significant here is the overall remarkable similarity in appearance between Harry and Hewitt. You can go on listing all the minor anatomical differences between them you like but they do not refute the basic facial similarities. THAT's what is significant. And that's what you cannot deny, despite your attempt to do so.

reply to post by micpsi


Harry has Diana's nose shape mixed with Charles's, the photo's I provided on the previous page show this. Hewitt has a wide bridged ski slope nose, Harry doesn't, their eyes are different, their face shape, their skin tone, their hair shape, their gait etc. There really aren't any similarities, truly.

There are however, lots of similarities between Harry and Charles.

reply to post by micpsi


Obviously your reply is contrary to your previous reply where you said you considered their eye colour the same.

I agree, despite good arguments from both sides he is 'spitting image' of Hewitt. Teeth, Nose angle, Eye color, hair color, Height and Build.

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by micpsi

 

Harry has Diana's nose shape mixed with Charles's, the photo's I provided on the previous page show this. Hewitt has a wide bridged ski slope nose, Harry doesn't, their eyes are different, their face shape, their skin tone, their hair shape, their gait etc. There really aren't any similarities, truly.

There are however, lots of similarities between Harry and Charles.

edit on 1-9-2013 by theabsolutetruth because: (no reason given)

One could find anatomical similarities between ANY two people. It does not necessarily mean they are genetically related! You inherit traits from BOTH your parents, not just your father, so the differences you cite prove nothing. The overall similarity of appearance is what counts. Just compare the faces of Hewitt and Harry:
images.sodahead.com...
The striking similarity has made LOTS of people wonder about them:
www.whale.to...
Your attempt to belittle what has struck MANY people is ludicrous. You are entiled to your belief but don't pass it off as though it was an obvious fact. Not only is it not obvious but it is to me (as well as many others) CLEARLY wrong.

Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by theabsolutetruth

 

Why would the pillion rider indicate 'mission accomplished' when it is unanimously accepted that Diana was very much conscious and talking in the immediate aftermath of the car crash? Surely this would indicate that the 'mission' wasn't quite 'accomplished' and Diana was alive?
No-one could have known then that she would subsequently die as a result of injuries sustained.

Maybe the motorcyclist's mission was to cause a crash and in that respect they had carried out their mission. Then an ambulance came along and took nearly 2 hours to get her to a hospital just 4 miles away which may have been a way of ensuring she was finished off. There were many well equipped hospitals she could have been taken to nearer than the one that she was sent to also. What possible reason could it take so long?

With regards to the Daily Mail article and the theory that this Mi6 group only set out to maim, I think it's a red herring. Killing 2 people on the scene and mortally wounding 1 was unbelievebly incompetent of such a professional group if they only meant to cause a broken limb. I think this article sets out to take the focus away from a planned assasination by leading us to believe some crappy intelligence group cocked up something that was supposed to be a warning. The ambulance delays are also never mentioned. Afterall Diana did write to her friend about her suspicions of Charles planning an accident in her car! All this to my mind indicates someone wanted to kill her.

As for prince Harry's parentage, I think he looks very much like his grandaddy Philip!

Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
As for prince Harry's parentage, I think he looks very much like his grandaddy Philip!

No one else has ever noted that, so I'd say that the claimed resemblance is what your belief in Harry's parentage tells your imagination to imagine!

Originally posted by micpsi

Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
As for prince Harry's parentage, I think he looks very much like his grandaddy Philip!

No one else has ever noted that, so I'd say that the claimed resemblance is what your belief in Harry's parentage tells your imagination to imagine!

Do you mean no one else here, or no-one else has ever mentioned it ever?!

I don't have a 'belief' in Harry's parentage, all we know is it is likely Charles but could also be Hewitt. Personally I can see a resemblance between Harry and Charles and Phil ..... but what someone looks like is not proof of anything! Maybe someone could upload a comparison of a young Phil and Harry but it's slightly off topic anyway.

reply to post by micpsi


On the previous page I noted that Harry looks like both his father Charles and his grandfather Philip.

reply to post by micpsi


I have studied genetics and I also know of inherited characteristics from many many genealogy case studies. It is very likely, that the strictly dominant characteristic, of narrow nasal bridge and small close set eyes that Charles inherited from his father Philip, that Harry also has, is inherited from Charles. Such a trait isn't seen in Diana, her immediate relatives, or Hewitt, who both in fact have wide set eyes.

Also this thread isn't about the likeness of Harry to his father.

reply to post by DrHammondStoat


If it was some sort of contracted hit, chances are, it would be made to look like multiple blame, nothing obvious, lots of 'unknowns' few witnesses, in a concealed place (like a tunnel), lots of possible factors etc. as well as after the event, a lot of smoke and mirrors as well as distraction techniques.

Princess Diana died because she was not wearing a seat belt

Had she been wearing a seat belt she would not have died. Simple.

Therefore, if she was murdered, the question is: who forced her not to wear a seat belt?

The cause of the accident is irrelevant.


Edit: perhaps it was Jimmy Saville? After all, he made a lot of money out of his "clunk-click, every trip" adverts ...... and this was perhaps the best (and most widely seen) advert ever for wearing a seatbelt?

Originally posted by AndyMayhew
Princess Diana died because she was not wearing a seat belt

Had she been wearing a seat belt she would not have died. Simple.

Mostly people in the rear seat do not wear a seat belt.
Now was she customarily used to buckle up in the rear seat is unknown.
So the case is quite complicated

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection


Seat belt or not, it is not an indication of whether there was foul play.

Also consider that there could have been foul play inside and outside the vehicle, as well as prior to the car entrants entering the vehicle, such as spiked drinks, and to the vehicle itself. I have heard of powerful magnets being placed under vehicles and activated when passing a strong magnet placed strategically.

There are people that work in industries such as Armaments depots that have access to such resources and it isn't impossible to sneak them out of 'secure' sites. Additionally, Special Services have access to devices the general public is probably unaware of, as well as many of the tactics used.