It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
If you don't want a free Coke, don't hug the machine.
Pay your 75¢ and be on your way.
But what ever you do, don't buy a Coke and then call the company evil.
Tis a bit counter-productive, wouldn't you agree?
''Ingredients from the coca leaf are used, but there is no coc aine in it and it is all tightly overseen by regulatory authorities.''
Besides producing the coca flavoring agent for Coca-Cola, Stepan extracts coc aine from the coca leaves, which it sells to Mallinckrodt Inc., a St. Louis pharmaceutical manufacturer that is the only company in the United States licensed to purify the product for medicinal use.
During the 1980's, imports of coca by Stepan have ranged from 56 metric tons to 588 metric tons a year, according to figures from the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Dr. Plowman, a botanist and taxonomist who spent years researching coca in Peru, said he had known people in that country who were responsible for buying coca for Coca-Cola and for doing agronomic research for the company. ''But it was always through intermediaries,'' he said. ''Two or three steps removed.'' Bales of coca destined for Stepan and, ultimately, for Coca-Cola are shipped to the Maywood plant through ports in New York and New Jersey, Mr. O'Brien said. Each shipment carries its own import permit, also issued by the D.E.A.
Maybe he works for Pepsi?
I don't much like Coke anyway myself. But I hear Pepsi is evil too! Isnt there any sugarwater that is not evil!
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
If you don't want a free Coke, don't hug the machine.
Pay your 75¢ and be on your way.
Originally posted by melancholiflower
reply to post by LoveFurther
Though I mostly agree with what you're pointing out here (and you've definitely given me food for thought), and could think of many people this would apply to I can also think of many who this doesn't.
A lot of the elderly generation I've met still aren't all that too clued up on advertising, and even more of the younger generation seem pretty oblivious even with the facts put to them. I've younger siblings who jump on the chance of half price pop not seeing (and more importantly, not wanting to see) how they're becoming addicted to the drink and will then turn to that drink in other places where it's not on offer.
I think a similar ploy could be at work here and kids will just see it as a bit of fun for free pop, when underlying it they're being turned to accepting and relying on the brand. When they don't get it for free and decide to buy some pop they'll go buy a coke without thinking twice about it, or worse they'll think twice but the hook has gauged itself so deep they'll do it anyway.
Being older and half educated, people seem to control their oral fixations a bit better, but children haven't quite acquired that just yet and will happily buy into it all whilst their parents go along with it for their own multitude of reasons and dysfunctions.
Seems that unless people are highly aware of their internal functioning the joke's always going to be on them.