It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Police in Texas have been caught conducting completely warrantless vaginal searches of women on the side of freeways.
Yes, you read that correctly.
A new set of videos show Texas state troopers probing women’s vaginas and anal areas while searching for drugs.
After watching the videos, which were taken by police car dashboard cams, it is painfully obvious that police were confident that the women did not have marijuana — but they went ahead with the cavity searches anyways.
Originally posted by gotya
reply to post by BABYBULL24
I'm just asking was it like 1:30...1:54....2:50....approx. when in the video or are you just trolling?
(typical troll.)edit on 11-8-2013 by gotya because: (no reason given)
A dash-cam video showed Bui's supervisor Nathaniel Turner ordering her to internally probe two women on the side of the road in a search for contraband. Turner had stopped them for speeding and said he could smell marijuana in their car. The video shows one of the women wincing as Bui conducted the search.
"It was determined that the relatively inexperienced trooper was directed by a more senior trooper to conduct the inappropriate search," McCraw said in a statement issued late Friday afternoon. "While the actions of Trooper Bui constitute misconduct, I believe her actions are mitigated such that she should not be terminated from the agency."
Originally posted by gotya
reply to post by Sharingan
wow where did that come from?
Originally posted by suz62
reply to post by BABYBULL24
I don't buy it. I think someone is sensationalizing a regular pat search. Where's the evidence of the search?edit on 8/11/2013 by suz62 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by suz62
reply to post by BABYBULL24
I don't buy it. I think someone is sensationalizing a regular pat search. Where's the evidence of the search?edit on 8/11/2013 by suz62 because: (no reason given)