It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Superhans
reply to post by XXXN3O
This whole issue has absolutely nothing to do with half of what some are even talking about here which shows a severe lack of knowledge in this area.
Not really, if you go back and read you can clearly see we were talking about the same thing. You really didn't have to but in and say we were talking about something else, not exactly sure what you are trying to say here.
Most of the rest of your post is just ranting that i don't really care about so im going to leave it out.
I mean if your gonna comment, at least read information on both sides before taking a stance please, for your own good and those around you or those that may read this thread with a lack of knowledge in the subject.
You are really just confusing "knowledge" with agreement, just because i don't agree does not mean i don't know. I will give you an excellent example in a sec.
I don't believe. I KNOW that this stuff is not good for you, if this pesticide would kill the fricken food you eat, its gonna kill you for crying out loud!
This whole lets label the stuff!!?? BAN IT NOW!
The organic pesticides can kill you too, should we ban those? Rotenone can cause parkinsons and is toxic, but that is organic.
Originally posted by rickymouse
People who want to hide unnatural chemistry being implemented into the food should be put in prison. They are violating the rights of others.
Originally posted by XXXN3O
If it comes across as ranting, then good because im tired of trying to politely put points across these days.
We should be moving forwards when possible and preventing backward steps.
Also its worth noting that I am not confusing knowledge with agreement.
I know how suggestion works and you articulate yourself in a suggestive manner that confuses people with lack of knowledge who may come across this thread.edit on 7-8-2013 by XXXN3O because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Superhans
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by Superhans
Organic food is cheaper!
Not its not, look at the price tags of the food. Organic is crazy expensive for no real reason other than greed, yet Monsanto is the giant greedy bad guy.
Just figure in the long term bills from all of your health problems
and Organic and Sustainable is way cheaper!
And it tastes better too!
Yet every study done cannot verrify that there is any difference in health or the taste of the two foods. Its religion, faith based garbage that does not hold up to real science.
We dont want to spend our lives funding Monsanto share holders!
And then this is where the true idiocy shines through. If you don't like monsanto, don't buy their food. Buy and eat organic. Why should everyone have to deal with these fundie organitards and their demands? If everyone really hated Monsanto they would be out of business.
:shk:
Originally posted by Superhans
I think monsanto is for the people, they provide cheap food for everyone. I don't think a company that charges 4 times as much for food because it uses "less" everything and is organic is really for anyone but the wealthy. All this organic crap is based on faith based health benefits and keeping up the appearance that you can afford to spend extra money on a stupid luxury.
Wow... just wow... anyway Sir Shill's Alot...
there are plenty of studies that show that GMO vegetables have little to no nutritional value you just don't care to look for them and I know for a fact no matter how many I site none would be good enough for you because they're from "fringe groups" so I'll save my time...
The problem the majority of people have isn't Monsanto's existence but the fact they want to put their crap in food and not have to label that it's in there and then in turn call these products "all natural" because "corn is from nature... it wasn't grown in a lab duh"...
People do really hate Monsanto... and they would be out of business... if we had a free market economy and people knew what to avoid eating... fact of the matter is we don't..
You do know for a fact Monsanto doesn't even serve their own crap in their own cafeterias right?
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
I'd rather buy food that is more expensive, then buy food full of poisons and pesticides.
Monsanto is for the people...? That's one of the dumber statements I've read on ATS in a while...
Why people defend this giant is beyond me. Considering they have been virtually run out of Europe... But yeah totally "for the people".
Originally posted by Superhandsl
I don't get why people think they are forced to buy monsanto's food.
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
reply to post by Superhans
"You people"? Are you trying to classify me into a group of people, or into a political group of some kind? Because if you are trying to say I'm some liberal or activist, you're wrong and by a long shot.
So they can provide a lot of food to a lot of people.for a cheaper price, that doesn't mean they are "for the people". The debate remains the same as it has in every Monsanto and GMO thread...
Certain GMO crops have been banned in certain countries in Europe. Believe what you want to believe, I'm not going to engage in some head beating argument on this, again...
-SAP-
Originally posted by Hollie
Originally posted by Superhandsl
I don't get why people think they are forced to buy monsanto's food.
They are forced to buy GMO crap foods because they DO NOT KNOW THEY ARE BUYING IT! Hello! If you have to label a can of soup that has ingredients that were processed in the same facility as eggs and peanuts, then consumers have every right to know if they are consuming GMO.edit on 7-8-2013 by Hollie because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
reply to post by Superhans
"You people"? Are you trying to classify me into a group of people, or into a political group of some kind? Because if you are trying to say I'm some liberal or activist, you're wrong and by a long shot.
So they can provide a lot of food to a lot of people.for a cheaper price, that doesn't mean they are "for the people". The debate remains the same as it has in every Monsanto and GMO thread...
Certain GMO crops have been banned in certain countries in Europe. Believe what you want to believe, I'm not going to engage in some head beating argument on this, again...
-SAP-
Originally posted by Superhans
Originally posted by Hollie
Originally posted by Superhandsl
I don't get why people think they are forced to buy monsanto's food.
They are forced to buy GMO crap foods because they DO NOT KNOW THEY ARE BUYING IT! Hello! If you have to label a can of soup that has ingredients that were processed in the same facility as eggs and peanuts, then consumers have every right to know if they are consuming GMO.edit on 7-8-2013 by Hollie because: (no reason given)
Oh, edited to say "is that simple enough for you?"
Then buy organic, because that is what will end up happening once everything is labeled. If it says organic its not GMO, simple enough for you?
Originally posted by Superhans
Yes into the anti-GMO group, pretty simple.
Originally posted by Superhans
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
reply to post by Superhans
"You people"? Are you trying to classify me into a group of people, or into a political group of some kind? Because if you are trying to say I'm some liberal or activist, you're wrong and by a long shot.
Yes into the anti-GMO group, pretty simple.
So they can provide a lot of food to a lot of people.for a cheaper price, that doesn't mean they are "for the people". The debate remains the same as it has in every Monsanto and GMO thread...
Cheap food for everyone vs really expensive food for those who can afford it. Its really the lower and middle class that can't participate in this new organic fad. But what good is a fad if it is cheap enough for the lower class to hop on to?
Certain GMO crops have been banned in certain countries in Europe. Believe what you want to believe, I'm not going to engage in some head beating argument on this, again...
-SAP-
Not really banned, Monsanto pulled the applications to plant new GMO foods in many countries in Europe, they continue to grow what they have been growing and the GMO market was never really booming for them in europe anyways. They are now investing and selling seeds in the EU and they are doing quite well.
Originally posted by marg6043
If monspanto crap was soo safe for human consumption and well being why are they spending millions of dollars trying to keep their crap from been label for public choice