It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by g2v12
Have you ever thought about the medium or fabric that allows your mind to travel through it? Like the mind being able to travel as a signal in a way that is similar to how your laptop connects to the internet. It came to me that such a medium is made of the same vitreous matter as our thoughts. Something on a quantum level that permeates the universe. Ad if you don't mind the question, what is your faith?
edit on 5-8-2013 by g2v12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hadriana
If you could do this, would you admit it? Esp withthe NSA overlords spying around?
I wonder who was looking through hers while she was looking through his?
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by g2v12
Have you ever thought about the medium or fabric that allows your mind to travel through it? Like the mind being able to travel as a signal in a way that is similar to how your laptop connects to the internet. It came to me that such a medium is made of the same vitreous matter as our thoughts. Something on a quantum level that permeates the universe. Ad if you don't mind the question, what is your faith?
edit on 5-8-2013 by g2v12 because: (no reason given)
I have thought about it..a lot...to me it feels like soft goo but there is no actual physical sensation..now that is going to sound weird...:/.... when you are in it you are it..its not separate or 'non local'...it isn't the vehicle...you are.
Originally posted by g2v12
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by g2v12
Have you ever thought about the medium or fabric that allows your mind to travel through it? Like the mind being able to travel as a signal in a way that is similar to how your laptop connects to the internet. It came to me that such a medium is made of the same vitreous matter as our thoughts. Something on a quantum level that permeates the universe. Ad if you don't mind the question, what is your faith?
edit on 5-8-2013 by g2v12 because: (no reason given)
I have thought about it..a lot...to me it feels like soft goo but there is no actual physical sensation..now that is going to sound weird...:/.... when you are in it you are it..its not separate or 'non local'...it isn't the vehicle...you are.
Perhaps you could find an author and write about your experiences.
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by g2v12
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by g2v12
Have you ever thought about the medium or fabric that allows your mind to travel through it? Like the mind being able to travel as a signal in a way that is similar to how your laptop connects to the internet. It came to me that such a medium is made of the same vitreous matter as our thoughts. Something on a quantum level that permeates the universe. Ad if you don't mind the question, what is your faith?
edit on 5-8-2013 by g2v12 because: (no reason given)
I have thought about it..a lot...to me it feels like soft goo but there is no actual physical sensation..now that is going to sound weird...:/.... when you are in it you are it..its not separate or 'non local'...it isn't the vehicle...you are.
Perhaps you could find an author and write about your experiences.
Irony? I am an author..and do..just not in an openly 'out' way as Ive done here..which has been freeing in an odd kind of way.
cheers
Ro
Originally posted by g2v12
We have something in common. I authored a book for a contactee. I come for the diversity of life's experiencers and sometimes see a little of myself in them. Unlike yourself, I find that talking about myself isn't liberating. But folks here stand out by the things they share. Its all good. As for seriousness, I think that any message which may benefit others should never be written by the messenger.
edit on 7-8-2013 by g2v12 because: grammar
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by g2v12
We have something in common. I authored a book for a contactee. I come for the diversity of life's experiencers and sometimes see a little of myself in them. Unlike yourself, I find that talking about myself isn't liberating. But folks here stand out by the things they share. Its all good. As for seriousness, I think that any message which may benefit others should never be written by the messenger.
edit on 7-8-2013 by g2v12 because: grammar
Its not the talking about myself that is liberating. Its having overcome the fear I have had to, in order to speak at all. Do you see yourself as a messenger? I don't. Nothing in my experience has said to me that I have the authority to speak on any issue as a subject matter expert. I get no' take this to xyz' either; nothing authorizing me to speak for anyone but myself. Where it counts to me I have already 'reported' and I am content to leave it and any further interpretation at that. This is why I don't write so much about what I hear outside of a personal experiential context..." I heard xyz".... and I make no judgment on it or its application. I do wonder a lot though...skeptically, respectfully, interrogate.
Originally posted by g2v12
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by g2v12
We have something in common. I authored a book for a contactee. I come for the diversity of life's experiencers and sometimes see a little of myself in them. Unlike yourself, I find that talking about myself isn't liberating. But folks here stand out by the things they share. Its all good. As for seriousness, I think that any message which may benefit others should never be written by the messenger.
edit on 7-8-2013 by g2v12 because: grammar
Its not the talking about myself that is liberating. Its having overcome the fear I have had to, in order to speak at all. Do you see yourself as a messenger? I don't. Nothing in my experience has said to me that I have the authority to speak on any issue as a subject matter expert. I get no' take this to xyz' either; nothing authorizing me to speak for anyone but myself. Where it counts to me I have already 'reported' and I am content to leave it and any further interpretation at that. This is why I don't write so much about what I hear outside of a personal experiential context..." I heard xyz".... and I make no judgment on it or its application. I do wonder a lot though...skeptically, respectfully, interrogate.
Everyone is a messenger of sorts, so I'm using it in a general, somewhat redacted meaning. No authority necessary in such a case. I think that people benefit from listening to others, and putting themselves out there for others to see. I've learned some interesting things from this thread.edit on 8-8-2013 by g2v12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rosha
From this context yes, I take your point...I say we are all students all teachers with much the same meaning. Historically though and for me personally, the term " messengers" has come with a context of its own and for me, in my experience of such messengers, it has usually meant engaging with people who have an over-weaned ego lying to my face and others operating from a basis of ego derived conceit.
Originally posted by 321equinox
reply to post by fr33kSh0w2012
How mind blowing to have that happen while your mind was occupied with typing. This seems like something that would happen during a relaxed or meditative state. I thought it was weird that my woman was standing up and busy when it happened. I wonder what in the world triggers this? Do you have an unusual interest in dolphins? Or do you feel inclined after that to know more? Just curious. Very interesting, but extremely mind boggling! I'm glad that I decided to post this. Maybe we can both learn something from the discussion. Thanks for sharing, fr33ksh0w!
Originally posted by g2v12
Originally posted by Rosha
From this context yes, I take your point...I say we are all students all teachers with much the same meaning. Historically though and for me personally, the term " messengers" has come with a context of its own and for me, in my experience of such messengers, it has usually meant engaging with people who have an over-weaned ego lying to my face and others operating from a basis of ego derived conceit.
There's the old adage of the false prophets. They are everywhere, and more so today than at any time due to the technology of global media and intricate matrix of social psychology. The better of it is seen in the prophets of doom - conspiracy theories which has become a distraction to the human intellect. Ignorance and distrust feed into one another, spawning the fabric of Myth. I think the real messengers are definitely not egocentric. Perhaps that is why they are seldom heard. We tend to pay more attention to the braggarts, who seem to know how to call attention to themselves. Rather like politicians.
As for threads, for me this is one of the best I've seen. Thanks 321equinox.edit on 8-8-2013 by g2v12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by g2v12
Originally posted by Rosha
From this context yes, I take your point...I say we are all students all teachers with much the same meaning. Historically though and for me personally, the term " messengers" has come with a context of its own and for me, in my experience of such messengers, it has usually meant engaging with people who have an over-weaned ego lying to my face and others operating from a basis of ego derived conceit.
There's the old adage of the false prophets. They are everywhere, and more so today than at any time due to the technology of global media and intricate matrix of social psychology. The better of it is seen in the prophets of doom - conspiracy theories which has become a distraction to the human intellect. Ignorance and distrust feed into one another, spawning the fabric of Myth. I think the real messengers are definitely not egocentric. Perhaps that is why they are seldom heard. We tend to pay more attention to the braggarts, who seem to know how to call attention to themselves. Rather like politicians.
As for threads, for me this is one of the best I've seen. Thanks 321equinox.edit on 8-8-2013 by g2v12 because: (no reason given)
True, I remember few years ago, " Prophet Yahweh" had my eyes rolling with his near charismatic capacity to convince so many people of his super skill of drawing down 'ufo's that looked like fireballs, not to mention his supposed divinity yet it was just a matter of time before he was revealed as the douche he is. What he hadn't also considered was the effect of prophecies on just that topic given much earlier in history in the bible...hmm no not a prophecy per say... more an in instruction given to the faithful, that " even if they call fire from the sky do not believe them' followed by a reminder that ' no one on earth or in heaven but ' the father' knows the time or day'. So he was stumped before he even got off the ground and had the chance to rip ppl off completely.
I think that what ppl *want* to believe determines how the process prophecy, visions and the extranatural etc.. The voice ppl hear reading it to themselves inside their heads..determines in some way how the information is received. It creates an immediate bias...and this bias is why it is important I feel to stay centrist..to remain plural in your ideas of what else a thing could be rather then devoted to a single view.
Originally posted by g2v12
The universe is a boiling soup of opposing forces, charges.