It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Diisenchanted
reply to post by neo96
Your quote:China is the largest state sponsored Hacking/Theft ring the world has ever seen.
My correction: The NSA is the largest state sponsored Hacking/Theft ring the world has ever seen.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by NotAnAspie
Really don't have to since it can be found with a simple 1 second google search:
www.techweekeurope.co.uk...
www.nytimes.com...
www.huffingtonpost.com...
www.zdnet.com...
China is the largest state sponsored Hacking/Theft ring the world has ever seen.
We done here?
Or going to make excuse's for their duplicitous nature.edit on 2-8-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Seriously, Why does the US constantly cry about things it does to everybody else?
How about stealing worldwide opportunity with it's outrageous self proclaimed God like international policies?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Only Nixon could go to China
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by NotAnAspie
Seriously, Why does the US constantly cry about things it does to everybody else?
Shouldn't that be China constantly crying?
How about stealing worldwide opportunity with it's outrageous self proclaimed God like international policies?
And China's 'outrageous self proclaimed God like'
I see this is nothing but a propaganda thread defending the communist regime..
Have fun with that.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by NotAnAspie
The games on China. They have played into Americas Economic war. This is all lip service.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by NotAnAspie
You got to be crapping me?
Are you seriously suggesting CHINA is a country that should be looked up to?
Something to aspire to?
What a joke.
America maybe be messed up sometimes it truly is But I will take America over any country in the world any day.
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
huh?
Elaborate your point because that sounded like some lines from a black and white spy movie.
Journalist James R. Norman argued that the U.S. and its allies use the price of oil as an economic weapon. The oil economic war against the Soviet Union worked so well in the 1980s, that this strategy is now being employed against "our other big geopolitical enemy," China, which currently imports more oil than the US, and is much less able to pay for it, he outlined. The thinking in Washington is, it's going to slow things down for China, and could put a crack in their political system, he continued.
Other aspects of the economic war the US is waging with China are on the front page of the paper almost every day-- with fights over trade actions, interest rates, and currency levels, he noted. The whole Chinese business model is based on predatory trade practices, and that's why the world is ganging up on them, Norman said, adding that China is facing large amounts of unemployment and social unrest, and their banks are sitting on huge assets of non-performing loans. Norman estimated that the actual cost of oil is between $10- $20 a barrel, but when US citizens shell out $4 a gallon at the pump, it's collateral damage or the price we pay to engage in an economic rather than physical war with China.
Companies like Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley are the economic warfare equivalent of a carrier battle group, because they are able to project power-- that's why financial restrictions were lessened for them, he explained. Morgan also touched on geopolitical/economic situations in such places as Russia, Europe, Iran, Venezuela, and Syria.
.
Revelations that top officials are targeting people to be assassinated abroad, including American citizens, are only the most recent, disturbing proof of how far our nation’s violation of human rights has extended. This development began after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and has been sanctioned and escalated by bipartisan executive and legislative actions, without dissent from the general public. As a result, our country can no longer speak with moral authority on these critical issues
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
huh?
Elaborate your point because that sounded like some lines from a black and white spy movie.
I should have assumed you didn't know......
Ive posted it a bunch of times.
Journalist James R. Norman argued that the U.S. and its allies use the price of oil as an economic weapon. The oil economic war against the Soviet Union worked so well in the 1980s, that this strategy is now being employed against "our other big geopolitical enemy," China, which currently imports more oil than the US, and is much less able to pay for it, he outlined. The thinking in Washington is, it's going to slow things down for China, and could put a crack in their political system, he continued.
Other aspects of the economic war the US is waging with China are on the front page of the paper almost every day-- with fights over trade actions, interest rates, and currency levels, he noted. The whole Chinese business model is based on predatory trade practices, and that's why the world is ganging up on them, Norman said, adding that China is facing large amounts of unemployment and social unrest, and their banks are sitting on huge assets of non-performing loans. Norman estimated that the actual cost of oil is between $10- $20 a barrel, but when US citizens shell out $4 a gallon at the pump, it's collateral damage or the price we pay to engage in an economic rather than physical war with China.
Companies like Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley are the economic warfare equivalent of a carrier battle group, because they are able to project power-- that's why financial restrictions were lessened for them, he explained. Morgan also touched on geopolitical/economic situations in such places as Russia, Europe, Iran, Venezuela, and Syria.
If you want to understand it all, listen to this.
To see monsato officials carted off in death vans, at this point, would have the American public CHEERING FOR MORE