It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
eriktheawful
No box, no actual 90 degree angles:
The debunkers were out in force on this one, i can be as tenacious when i know im right. Vicious and uneducated debunking says that this thread is the real deal. Anyone who has a smidging of archaeological knowledge can see that.
skalla
I felt so sorry for you, bumping your own thread in both September and then in November, that i thought i'd stop by and give you some attention. Bless x
symptomoftheuniverse
The debunkers were out in force on this one, i can be as tenacious when i know im right. Vicious and uneducated debunking says that this thread is the real deal. Anyone who has a smidging of archaeological knowledge can see that.
skalla
I felt so sorry for you, bumping your own thread in both September and then in November, that i thought i'd stop by and give you some attention. Bless x
you know the debunking was not aimed at you now was it?
skalla
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
The fact that you refer to me as a debunker, rather than someone just analysing a picture of geology. You also say anyone who thinks that this is not an earth shattering find of a box with compartments lacks any archaeological experience - clearly not the case and also hyper defensive. Then you proceed to ask a series of juvenile questions that demonstrate a lack of understanding on your own part.
ETA: and your bumps were just funny, i really could not help it!
edit on 6-11-2013 by skalla because: (no reason given)
some expert are you,lol. All you can see is flint.
skalla
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
It's the most obvious non artifact i have ever seen on ATS and yet you project something on it that you see as totally obvious, in complete denial of whats in front of you. You got your bump though, and you're welcome
symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by doorhandle
Wrong