It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Imagine that you were only in a position to detect, observe, and categorize the emissions of an engine.
Yes... basically it means what if you could only make scientific observations of "poop".
How much information about the motivations of the "pooper" do you think you would be capable of deducing? Especially considering that anything considered "useful" to the "pooper" is never given to you. Only that which is rejected. Meaning, that which is rare in the poop, but abundant in the pooper's world will not be accurately reflected to you. That which is abundant in the poop is not useful in the pooper's world.
What sort of models do you think the scientific method, as wonderful as it is, will be capable of constructing?
Empires of Poop?
So do we eat poop too?
Originally posted by liveandlearn
I truly wish I had something intelligent to say to your post but I don't. Shaking head and looking forward to replies.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
So do we eat poop too?
Thanks for the visual.
Though we are born without them, bacteria inhabit our body within seconds of our birth. They live in our mouths, around our eyes, in our digestive systems, under our arms and in the shoots of our hair. Most are helpful or at least harmless. The three or so pounds of bacteria living in our gut—mostly in the large intestine—help us digest all manner of food.
"The complex and branched sugars found in fruits and vegetables pose a challenge for the human body and are degraded mostly by the gut microbes,"
Gut microbes, which help humans degrade otherwise indigestible plant material, acquire some crucial digestive enzyme genes from the bacteria in the food we eat, according to a study published this week in Nature. This new finding provides an example of horizontal gene transfer by which diet can influence the genetic diversity and functionality of the human gut microbiome.
"I think we're at the tip of the iceberg here. Human diet is so diverse, I think that we're just getting an initial glimpse of what's likely to be really huge area of variation that differentiates populations of humans." The human digestive tract harbors trillions of bacteria, many of which establish lifetime, symbiotic relationships with their hosts. The food we eat nourishes our gut flora, and those bacteria feed us with the products and byproducts of their own digestive activities. Consequently, the gut microbiome has evolved to encode a variety of digestive enzymes, for example, those that break down hard-to-digest polysaccharides in food plants, such as celery, broccoli, and other vegetables.
Originally posted by ErgoTheEgo
Original context...
Imagine that you were only in a position to detect, observe, and categorize the emissions of an engine.
Yes... basically it means what if you could only make scientific observations of "poop".
How much information about the motivations of the "pooper" do you think you would be capable of deducing? Especially considering that anything considered "useful" to the "pooper" is never given to you. Only that which is rejected. Meaning, that which is rare in the poop, but abundant in the pooper's world will not be accurately reflected to you. That which is abundant in the poop is not useful in the pooper's world.
What sort of models do you think the scientific method, as wonderful as it is, will be capable of constructing?
Empires of Poop?
No matter what worldview you hold... the undeniable fact is that every observation we make is of the OUTCOME of some process. Whether it is a conscious process, a mechanical process, a mathematical process, a thought process, I don't care. It is the "output". Output is poop. Period. Many "things" go in, something "different" (depending on the "process") comes out.
Otherwise the input and output would be identical and there would be no perceivable change. In order for there to be a perceivable change, "something" must be "converted" into "something else".
We are the poop of whatever it is that generates us. Theist, materialist, don'tcareist... doesn't matter.
Poop Be Upon You
/namasalute
Originally posted by ErgoTheEgo
Otherwise the input and output would be identical and there would be no perceivable change. In order for there to be a perceivable change, "something" must be "converted" into "something else".
We are the poop of whatever it is that generates us.
Originally posted by pstrron
reply to post by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
So do we eat poop too?
Yep, it's called a giant poop sandwich and we all got to take a bite. That is unless you have a lot of bread then the amount of poop you have to eat is less. No bread...well you get the picture.
Isn't it just wonderful to find out we are all in the loo taking a swim thinking it's a lovely pool full of interesting things.