It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Senduko
I'm thinking Al-cia'da "terrorist" cells.
OR something that occurred to me; I recently heard here in Belgium the European council is trying to get a bill approved that would force every country to put in a safety deadlock on tracks.
Maybe something like that? I don't know still.. I fear this isn't the last one this year. But why trains tho?
EDIT: nvm that wouldn't explain china,russia, canada.edit on 24-7-2013 by Senduko because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by intergalactic fire
reply to post by elevenaugust
Anyone an idea what's happening on the ramp at the left just prior to the crash?
If this footage is available there should also be other footages from other trains, just to compare.
As for the speed it should be easy to calculate the speed from the video.
The moment the train passes under the bridge to the moment of the crash takes about 3-4 seconds.
There are roughly 5 poles inbetween, seen from streetview goo.gl...
What's the distance between each pole, anyone an idea?
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by intergalactic fire
reply to post by smurfy
Indeed .
And why is it that only one wagon catched fire? Another wagon flied and ended up on a sort of bridge or road 5 meters higher than the rails.
Just saw an interview with an eyewitness saying he heard an explosion and saw a part of the train jumping, flying, which after that it derailededit on 24-7-2013 by intergalactic fire because: (no reason given)
The BBC had a Spanish newspaper reporter on the telephone, and she says that several carriages had fire, that one carriage was completely, either disintegrated or totally crushed, (the interaction on the telephone line was difficult to make out) but she also made the point that the derailment is being treated as an 'accident' by the government sources, but as if there is still nothing positive to say so.
Originally posted by Blasdelezo
The story goes. Probably the train's velocity was too high to take the curve, where the accident happened.
Originally posted by Cyprex
Originally posted by goou111
reply to post by Senduko
I mean really how many times have you hard about deadly train wrecks? Prior to this year..
Honestly, I can't think of any
A minimal amount of research shows about 40 per year.
Mostly India and China.
List of Rail Accidents between 2010 and Present
The number per year almost doubles after 2005.
List of Train Accidents between 2000 and 2009
edit on 7/24/13 by Cyprex because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by intergalactic fire
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
Maybe that depends on the weight of each carriage, the first one contains the motor compartiment.
My calculations from what's seen on the footage and the distance messured in googlemaps, the train would indeed be going at around 180km/h.
So at first sight the problem seems to be in the electronics, the automatic brakes(security system) that failed.
The day before, the train had an inspection and all was found normal.
Anyone an idea what's the thing moving on the platform at the left?
Also i think the explosion happened after the train derailed, if you look at when the electric cables starts to move and the moment of explosion.
Another thing, who would release this footage just moments after the crash?
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by geobro
the news in the u.k is saying that the explosion was heard before the crash
Is it really? Funny that - I've been watching TV all night at work and no mention of it - who exactly is talking about an explosion?
Here is an eyewitness account of someone who was on the train:
One passenger on the train, Sergio Prego, told SER radio station he was lucky to get out of the train alive.
"The train was going at a very fast speed and on the curve it went off the tracks and it overturned. We were the lucky ones that were able to get out on our own feet.
www.bbc.co.uk...
reply to post by hotel1
Actually, in the UK the authorities will remove bodies in exactly the same manner.
Recovery of bodies and survivors actually takes precedence over collecting any evidence. A good comparison would be the Ladbroke Grove crash which killed 31 people in 1999 (which I actually avoided being caught in by virtue of being late) - Here is a link to the Story on BBC from the day and images clearly show removal of bodies
Originally posted by Bluesma
Last week when the train derailed in Paris, reports said it was caused purposely- it was a terrorist attack of some kind. Something fairly small was put on the track, which caused the high speed train to derail.
Now, I wasn't paying a lot of attention, I was in the middle of an intense workweek, and did not watch any television. I was limited to hearing what my husband and collegues were telling me, and the reports on the car radio.
Again, funny that - I never once heard that it was caused purposely and I think the point here is that you were not paying attention. There was speculation that sloppy maintenance was to blame and the prevailing theory at the moment is that a faulty point was the cause.
That accident has a lot of similarities to the Potters Bar crash in 2002, which too was the cause of poor maintenance missing a faulty point, sending the train careering into the station platform.edit on 25/7/13 by stumason because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hp1229
reply to post by Senduko
You're right. There does seem to be an explosion in the rear compartments somewhere before it the derailment...interesting. Lets see what the investigators uncover. Pretty sad.