It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Granite
Finally something to smile about in America.
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Why should I smile about another drone?
Inside the “Cockpit” of X-47B
Ever wonder what it would be like to pilot a UAV like the Predator or the X-47b? Check out this video of a two person team in action.
globalbalita.com...
Here’s what the X-47B doesn’t do: think.Here’s what the X-47B does: It takes off and lands by itself with input from computers and sensors aboard the carrier as well as input from humans on the carrier. Everything it does in between takeoff and landing is executed by the aircraft’s onboard flight computer. But it’s not controlled by the onboard computer.
Where Predator and Reaper drones are remotely piloted by humans with hands on a control stick, the X-47B is operated by humans using keyboard commands and mouse clicks. The operator tells it to go to a certain point on the map, and the X-47B pilots itself there. The onboard computer handles the actual piloting--the banking of the airplane to set a path from point A to point B, for instance--but the human operator is ultimately in control of where it goes and what it does.
About The X-47B
Originally posted by Granite
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Originally posted by Granite
Finally something to smile about in America.
Explain.
Why should I smile about another drone?
I watched a few of the videos, am I missing something?
Obviously, you don't understand (or care about) aviation milestones in history:
1. It has no tail and is landing on a moving carrier.
2. It re-fuels autominously in the near future.
I think you would have more contribution in another forum and off my thread...
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by Dustytoad
It's moving a number of technologies forward, that will have uses in other fields, as well as military uses. Both aircraft autonomously made the decision to abort landings on the carrier after they detected faults in systems (one was a navigation fault in one of three computers, the other wasn't specified). The landings they both made were all done autonomously, if we had that technology in commercial aircraft, Asiana 214 may not have happened. There are other systems that will be usable in future air traffic control systems, as well as datalinks from aircraft to the ground, etc. A lot of the things tested here are exciting to see, and will help make flying safer in many ways.
Originally posted by Murgatroid
Originally posted by Granite
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Originally posted by Granite
Finally something to smile about in America.
Why should I smile about another drone?
Obviously, you don't understand (or care about) aviation milestones in history:
1. It has no tail and is landing on a moving carrier.
2. It re-fuels autominously in the near future.
I think you would have more contribution in another forum and off my thread...
Dusty's question was a valid one...
The fact that you insulted him instead of answering the question makes it very obvious to me that YOU don't understand (or care about) the real purpose behind these "aviation milestones".