It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ADMIT: NSA SPIES ON FRIENDS' FRIENDS' FRIENDS
Chris Inglis, the agency's deputy director, was one of several government representatives—including from the FBI and the office of the Director of National Intelligence—testifying before the House Judiciary Committee this morning. Most of the testimony largely echoed previous testimony by the agencies on the topic of the government's surveillance, including a retread of the same offered examples for how the Patriot Act and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act had stopped terror events.
But Inglis' statement was new. Analysts look "two or three hops" from terror suspects when evaluating terror activity, Inglis revealed. Previously, the limit of how surveillance was extended had been described as two hops. This meant that if the NSA were following a phone metadata or web trail from a terror suspect, it could also look at the calls from the people that suspect has spoken with—one hop. And then, the calls that second person had also spoken with—two hops. Terror suspect to person two to person three. Two hops. And now: A third hop.
...
For a sense of scale, researchers at the University of Milan found in 2011 that everyone on the Internet was, on average, 4.74 steps away from anyone else. The NSA explores relationships up to three of those steps.
Originally posted by loam
Effectively, if the government isn't watching you, you're in the minority.
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by xDeadcowx
The opportunities for abuse seem massive now, don't they?
Sad it had to happen in this country.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
4. Toooooooooooo full of their own propagandized swill to have anything interesting or useful to listen to;
&/or
5. Toooooooooooo effectively under one or more of their various effective mind control schemes to be any threat;
&/or
6. Toooooooooooo compulsively given to chronically waddling around with your head in a ~handy dark place;
&/or
7. Toooooooooooo addicted to mindlessly cheering the mind control organs of CNN, MSNBC, ....to bother with;
Originally posted by ErgoTheEgo
I think it's pretty likely that the biggest cheerleaders also have their own significant monitoring going on, because those are exactly the ones who are most likely to over-react should they finally figure out and more difficulty... accept... their role in things. The more visible, the more potent such an about-face can be to the ones parroting them.
Those of us who have been methodically and patiently beating the drum of awareness while also increasing our own awareness can be depended upon to be unlikely to make an about face and go ballistic... otherwise we would have already done so by now.
If they keep this up Kevin Bacon is going to get charged with terrorism.
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by xDeadcowx
The opportunities for abuse seem massive now, don't they?
Sad it had to happen in this country.