It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
2010 KQ was discovered by astronomer Richard Kowalski at the NASA-sponsored Catalina Sky Survey in the mountains just north of Tucson, Ariz., on May 16. Five days later, it made its closest approach to Earth at a distance just beyond the moon's orbit. The object is departing Earth's neighborhood but will be returning in 2036.
Originally posted by JimOberg
I can think of no 'a priori' reasons why this might not already be true, but the debate hereabouts is, do the things people report have anything to do with this hypothesis? Worth debating, for sure!
Invisible alien probes “could already be” in our solar system
Fleets of robotic space probes from alien civilisations could already have arrived in our solar system, a mathematical study has found.
uk.news.yahoo.com...
Original report here:
arxiv.org...
That's what differs proper science from your so called 'scientists' that are nothing but people with some diplom and zero objectivity.
We do not see anything, therefore it must not be there - we have right to doubt without a single clue but that doesn't mean something may not be there just cause we don't know about it. Open mindness is the key, for you never know what can be.
There are those shallow and ignorant skeptics I am talking about
Originally posted by JimOberg
I can think of no 'a priori' reasons why this might not already be true, but the debate hereabouts is, do the things people report have anything to do with this hypothesis? Worth debating, for sure!
Invisible alien probes “could already be” in our solar system
Fleets of robotic space probes from alien civilisations could already have arrived in our solar system, a mathematical study has found.
uk.news.yahoo.com...
Original report here:
arxiv.org...
If something cannot be tested it doesn't exist? Lots of things one may not even imagine can exist and they may exist - if science doesn't accept this (correction: main stream science) - then this is pseudoscience! Or better change its approach.
'I do not know something like that can exist, therefore no way it can exist!'
if science doesn't accept this (correction: main stream science) - then it better change its approach, this is the science I disapprove.