It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Generations? Whoa. Will we even have a country a few generations from now? Wow, that is a discouraging forecast.
I'm thinking that at this point and time, well have to wait a few more generations. There are to many people making money off of race baiting.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by madmac5150
The problem isn't so much a problem of the people, but a problem of the message that the MSM continues to pound down our throats in collusion with the Gov't and the NAACP. They want division and animosity... it makes for compelling television and the MSM will keep milking it as long as they can.
BINGO...
Controversy sells
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by firemonkey
He was brought in for questioning, his story and witnesses meshed up, so he was let go, as per the law. Every time a white person does something to a black, it must be because of race. But that accusation is never tossed out when another race does something to a white person, even when they straight up say it's because they are white.edit on Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:16:48 -0500 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by firemonkey
reply to post by charles1952
I see in your post that you are trying to compare the "N" word with Cracker.
Now tell me, do you honestly not know why one is considered worse than the other? I'll give you a hint, history.
Originally posted by firemonkey
It is kind of dumb to compare the two cases.
I'm sorry to ask a question with no answer (Actually, I'm not. Better that you wrestle with it than me.), But if government and politics runs the show, and I assume you see no difference between the Rs and the Ds, where can we go to try to change things?
The government owns the federal justice system, the equal employment opportunity commission, and the schools, along with who knows how many other agencies. The news system is largely in the pocket of the current government (Of course, they hated Bush so maybe it does matter which party gets in power), with the exception of am radio, some cable and parts of the internet. Hollywood isn't doing anything to calm racial tensions.
What's left? Parents? Churches? Boy scouts? Those seem pretty weak cards to play in this society
Only to the extent that they are both considered racial insults. Certainly one is worse, at least in the eyes of society. You can write out one of the terms on ATS and the press, but not the other.
I see in your post that you are trying to compare the "N" word with Cracker.
OK, fine, I'm with you. Doesn't most of America acknowledge that? I thought it was a given.
Before we can have an honest talk about race, we have to acknowledge that there are certain races that have been systematically and institutionally discriminated against...legally.
Certainly it makes a difference. I agreed to that at the beginning of this post.
Now if you don't understand why that makes a difference, then there is no discussion we can have about race.
Originally posted by charles1952
PLEASE EVERYBODY
Of course you can write what you like, but I'd really rather not turn this into a Martin - Zimmerman thread. That's a different issue, and there are at least a dozen threads on that subject. I don't want to lose this one.
Thanks for your consideration.
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by TKDRL
A racial slur, is a racial slur, is a racial slur. Trying to say one is "worse" than another is retarded. Insulting people with disparaging words for their race is racist. Racist is racist, neither is better than the other.