It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ragiusnotiel
Even so, Direne is most likely brilliant and I'm sure quite proficient in math. So I am curious why she'd say it in the first place, you know if it makes no sense.
So either she's just talking babble which doesn't 'seem' like her, or on top of having ways to communicate that we can not understand- she also understands otherworldly math equations and space travel secrets.
Ah, I don't even know.
Originally posted by ragiusnotiel
reply to post by abeverage
The whole thing or just the alien bit?
For scenario 1, you do exactly the same. The difference is this: you were travelling at near the speed of light (otherwise forget about coming from an exoplanet). It happens that 7 years at that speed means 500 years for you. This means that the 1947 crash happened just 3 months ago for the guys in the mothership. hence, assuming those guys would do exactly what you would do in a similar situation, you should be expecting those guys to pop up in about 2 months, Earth time.
Originally posted by Direne
reply to post by Brotherman
I need to leave now. Tomorrow we can talk more about this. For now, just think about this: you are born to explore other planets. Actually, the time will come in which you will need to leave your planet. For that trip, you must have had already selected a target viable exoplanet. By the time you are called to leave your planet, you would have acquired the knowledge to travel at near the speed of light.
In fact, if you don't, you are dead.
Going to an exoplanet is a one-way trip. No return. Therefore, if you go, you go to stay. At any cost. At any rate.
And what you'll do... is what they are doing. Logic is logic.
Finally, 500 years Earth time is just 7 years spacetime, at the speed of light. Events that you think happened in 1950, happened 3 months ago, from the point of view of someone approaching you at near c.
I wouldn't dismiss RV as a viable sounding technology. Actually, is the only one you have. Inside your brain.
See you all tomorrow.
The Gallu Demons are mentioned in attempting to assist Enki in his recovery of the Mes Tablets, containing the words of power and authority, after Inanna has got them off him and made her way back to Uruk with them.
Metatron
...According to Jewish medieval apocrypha, he is Enoch, ancestor of Noah, transformed into an angel. There are no references to Metatron as an angel in the Jewish Tanakh or Christian scriptures (New and Old Testament);...he is mentioned in a few brief passages in the Talmud, Metatron appears primarily in medieval Jewish mystical texts and other post-scriptural esoteric and occult sources, such as the Books of Enoch—1 Enoch, 2 Enoch, and 3 Enoch. In Rabbinic tradition, he is the highest of the angels and serves as the celestial scribe.[2]
. . .
Metatron is identified with the term "lesser YHVH", which is the Lesser Tetragrammaton, in a Talmudic version as cited by the Karaite scholar Kirkisani. The word Metatron is numerically equivalent to Shaddai (God) in Hebrew gematria; therefore, he is said to have a "Name like his Master". However, Kirkisani may have misrepresented the Talmud in order to embarrass his Rabbanite opponents with evidence of polytheism. On the other hand, extra-talmudic mystical texts (see below regarding Sefer Hekhalot) do speak of a "lesser YHVH", apparently deriving the concept from Exodus 23:21, which mentions an angel of whom God says "my name [understood as YHVH, the usual divine Proper Name] is in him".
The Ten Commandments as Natural Law
It would follow that each of the Ten Commandments can be deduced from natural law. Such a deduction is sometimes taken as evidence supporting the argument from morality.
In this article, we examine the plausibility of such a deduction.
. . .
That we only now know several of these arguments to be fallacious is, perhaps, a demonstration that grounding these sorts of arguments in natural law is not a very good idea.
. . .
So this made some sense for the Jews of that time, but not universally -- especially now that a majority of the world's population worships YHVH.
. . .
Conclusion
Although several of the Ten Commandments are at least partially deducible from natural law, or common sense, others are not. This would tend to put the lie to the argument from morality, which would only work if the entire law were revealed in nature (as a "watermark" of sorts).
n. 1) standards of conduct derived from traditional moral principles (first mentioned by Roman jurists in the first century A.D.) and/or God's law and will. The biblical ten commandments, such as "thou shall not kill," are often included in those principles. Natural law assumes that all people believe in the same Judeo-Christian God and thus share an understanding of natural law premises.
Originally posted by Brotherman
reply to post by Jonjonj
I dont think I read this person ever say extraterrestrial to be honest, I think it is just enough to watch and see what conclusions are drawn from the vague and cryptic perhaps this person is saying something else metaphorically, maybe it is literal however this person never said extraterrestrial, some may argue in a place on that site from ayndryl was said non human entities but this still isnt ET unless you want it to be JS
also the code you linked is almost Cessani Diskus but it means nothing without color as this code is projected by sound whoever posted that probably didnt realize its significance and really leads me to believe that video was meant for ATS simply because comments on all other videos are disabled also it took them over a year to get more then 20 hits on some of there vids and now almost all are over a hundred hmmmmedit on 17-7-2013 by Brotherman because: (no reason given)
It probably says "dont forget to drink your ovaltine"edit on 17-7-2013 by Brotherman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Brotherman
reply to post by Jonjonj
It probably says "dont forget to drink your ovaltine"
Originally posted by Brotherman
reply to post by Jonjonj
Im not calling it anything, I am suggesting however to not drink the Kool-aid. why would a mother ship send anything if such a thing exists (this is if you want to take this as a literal hint) if a ship crashed? If an F-16 crashed I doubt Command and control would send anything manned by humans to check it out, more likely then not it would be checked out by a drone or satellite and further action would be computed by alot of people in command and control chances are teh pilot would be retrieved by diplomatic channels if survived and detained, if not and EnE then would be directed to Intel/covert assests. If you are reading into this as a hint then you are thinking about the kool-aide be careful