It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beckybecky
Originally posted by Pardon?
So, if you're what you like to consider opposite to big pharma (i.e. you care about people's health more than you do about money or fame), do people a service by telling us your secret method.
If it works (and I'll know pretty much immediately if it does or not) I can gurantee I will be your biggest advocate.
And you can believe me on that.
but you have already said only chemo works in your book.this automatically means that anything that is not chemo does not work in your book.
Dr. John Ely, emeritus professor at the University of Washington, has also shown that sugar depletes vitamin C from white blood cells and makes them sluggish. White blood cells are the very cells that attack tumor cells and destroy them.
The cancer cell-killing effect of vitamin C is realized by the transient production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) within connective tissues (not in blood), which then destroys tumor cells, and subsequently turns to harmless water (H2O), ensuring non-toxic therapy.
New research published in the journal Nature Medicine has confirmed that processed sugar is one of the primary driving forces behind the growth and spread of cancer tumors, so much so that the future of cancer screening could rely on scanning the body for sugar accumulation.
Scientists from University College London (UCL) in the U.K. made this discovery after experimenting with a new cancer detection method that involves utilizing a unique form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After sensitizing an MRI scanner to look specifically for glucose in the body, it was revealed that cancer tumors, which feed off sugar, light up brightly as they contain high amounts of sugar.
"The new technique, called 'glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer' (glucoCEST), is based on the fact that tumors consume much more glucose (a type of sugar) than normal, healthy tissues in order to sustain their growth," explains a recent UCL announcement, noting that tumors appear as "bright images" on MRI scans of mice.
Originally posted by Pardon?
Originally posted by beckybecky
Originally posted by Pardon?
but you have already said only chemo works in your book.this automatically means that anything that is not chemo does not work in your book.
I'll spell it out again.
Chaemo can be effective for very specific types of cancer.
Most of the time though it is used in conjunction with other therapies such as rad and surgery.
.
Originally posted by Pardon?
reply to post by beckybecky
Not one listing in the A-Z on here can be proven to be effective.
Originally posted by beckybecky
Originally posted by Pardon?
reply to post by beckybecky
Not one listing in the A-Z on here can be proven to be effective.
Not one listing in the A-Z on here can be proven to be effective.
Proven by who?
Originally posted by Pardon?
Originally posted by beckybecky
Originally posted by Pardon?
reply to post by beckybecky
Not one listing in the A-Z on here can be proven to be effective.
Not one listing in the A-Z on here can be proven to be effective.
Proven by who?
The person who posted it.
The people who have put these "cures" on the internet in the first place.
Anyone with cancer who takes the treatment to cure themselves.
Firstly I can't see anywhere that I've discredited or attacked John Ely. I said all I can find was that he was a professor of physics (strangely, I also found that out at Zoominfo in my previous post....). I can't actually find the specific study in a credible format other than what's linked on vitamin sites.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Pardon?
Firstly I can't see anywhere that I've discredited or attacked John Ely. I said all I can find was that he was a professor of physics (strangely, I also found that out at Zoominfo in my previous post....). I can't actually find the specific study in a credible format other than what's linked on vitamin sites.
The study was conducted in 1979, well before the Internet was even up and kicking....The first line is the most important to me. Unless you can discredit either John Ely's work or the Science behind both posts I explained, then I will move forward with my contention, and you can see the whole 'therapy' as being iffy.
Essentially, I will be content with what I believe is correct, unless you can somehow prove it incorrect other than your personal opinions and convictions. Preferably, with objective facts and "science" as to why John Ely's work is wrong, or that sugar does not rob Vitamin C from white blood cells, the same cells responsible for attacking cancerous ones.edit on 20-7-2013 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beckybecky
Originally posted by Pardon?
Originally posted by beckybecky
Originally posted by Pardon?
reply to post by beckybecky
Not one listing in the A-Z on here can be proven to be effective.
Not one listing in the A-Z on here can be proven to be effective.
Proven by who?
The person who posted it.
The people who have put these "cures" on the internet in the first place.
Anyone with cancer who takes the treatment to cure themselves.
so when a company posts something anything it does not have prove anything but a person does.
the people posting are posting information just like you do.they don't have to prove anything.heard of newspapers with the latest telling about the latest wonder drug at 1000% mark up with massaged figures to support its alleged effectiveness.
you said any person who cures themselves is just some sort of magic spontaneous remission and nothing to with any action they took since chemo is the god standard in your book.
Originally posted by intergalactic fire
Anyone saw this docu?
Burzynski: Cancer Is Serious Business
vimeo.com...
Didn't yet had time to research some points made in the docu and the credibility of it, maybe it has already been covered on ATS, what do you guys make of this?
I have a strong guess that Big pharma is one big corrupt, profit making bussiness, where the real descision makers care much more for power and creating a monopoly than curing people from their disease. There is no money to make in a cure.
I also believe there are other alternative, less expensive and safer cures for for example cancer.
Which those are i don't know but i would put my money in nature.
This is also an interesting docu i saw the other day.
War on Health - Gary Null's documentary exposing the FDA
www.youtube.com...
I will pardon myself now for just posting 'some youtube videos' and not the actual paper reports and other research material. When more time is available for me i will look a bit deeper into it, for the meantime maybe some other members did their research and care the share.
The cancer cell-killing effect of vitamin C is realized by the transient production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) within connective tissues (not in blood), which then destroys tumor cells, and subsequently turns to harmless water (H2O), ensuring non-toxic therapy.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Pardon?
My point was the study in particular, that you are searching for, might NOT be on the internet, and must be found in real documents or requests from University of Washington.
The cancer cell-killing effect of vitamin C is realized by the transient production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) within connective tissues (not in blood), which then destroys tumor cells, and subsequently turns to harmless water (H2O), ensuring non-toxic therapy.
This is what I am referring to as well...Vitamin C allows white blood cells to carry the H202 directly to the source of the cancerous cells. However, if said cancer patient, is consuming a diet high in HFCS, etc, it could potentially rob the bodies white blood cells of their ability to kill the cancer cells.edit on 20-7-2013 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Pardon?
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Pardon?
My point was the study in particular, that you are searching for, might NOT be on the internet, and must be found in real documents or requests from University of Washington.
The cancer cell-killing effect of vitamin C is realized by the transient production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) within connective tissues (not in blood), which then destroys tumor cells, and subsequently turns to harmless water (H2O), ensuring non-toxic therapy.
This is what I am referring to as well...Vitamin C allows white blood cells to carry the H202 directly to the source of the cancerous cells. However, if said cancer patient, is consuming a diet high in HFCS, etc, it could potentially rob the bodies white blood cells of their ability to kill the cancer cells.edit on 20-7-2013 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Unless the patient is diabetic or the cancer is interfering with their insulin production somehow, irrespective of how much and what types of sugar they consume, their serum levels will remain in quite a tight range.
There have been numerous studies on high dose intravenous vit C for cancer and as yet, none have shown much in the way of promise.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
There is a different in administering IV Vitamin C, and administering liposomal Vitamin C. You have not taken into account the stress that comes with having Cancer. Stress produces cortisol. Cortisol raises blood sugar. Thus, cortisol depletes Vitamin C. Does the patient smoke cigarettes? That depletes a further 25 mg from the body per cigarette. Does the patient consume a diet high in refined carbs, sugars, or high fructose corn syrup?
There are lots of factors at play here, and one should never be so careless as to dismiss the efficacy of something based on incomplete evidence.
If they are testing cancer patients that eat processed foods typical of corporate America, stressed not only over their condition but general living conditions today, smoking like a chimney, drinking a 12 oz. Diet Shasta Orange every five minute; how exactly is this going to ensure a true evaluation if they are just interfering with the whole thing in the first place? You already know this!!!
Doctors tell patients all the time while they are on medication like Coumadin : "No collard greens, spinach, etc." Why? Because they contain Vitamins E & K, which can interfere with the efficacy of Coumadins blood thinning properties. Now if they are setting up studies to test if Vitamin C is effective on cancer patients, and these patients are living lives completely antithetical to that Vitamin C treatment; how in the world is that going to ensure that they get a correct evaluation??? They aren't, and you know this just as well as they do...That's how you rig trials and studies.... Just saying...edit on 21-7-2013 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Even though I'm not a betting man I would wager that there would be a number of patients who don't smoke or eat unhealthily.