It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
PRISM is a clandestine national security electronic surveillance program operated by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) since 2007. PRISM is a government code name for a data-collection effort known officially by the SIGAD US-984XN.
On September 11, 2007, U.S. President George W. Bush signed the Protect America Act of 2007, allowing the NSA to start a massive domestic surveillance program. The program is operated under the supervision of the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).[citation needed] Its existence was leaked five years later by NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who claimed the extent of mass data collection was far greater than the public knew, and included "dangerous" and "criminal" activities in law. The disclosures were published by The Guardian and The Washington Post on June 6, 2013.
A document included in the leak indicated that PRISM was "the number one source of raw intelligence used for NSA analytic reports."The leaked information came to light one day after the revelation that the FISC had been ordering a subsidiary of telecommunications company Verizon Communications to turn over to the NSA logs tracking all of its customers' telephone calls on an ongoing daily basis.
U.S. government officials have disputed some aspects of the Guardian and Washington Post stories and have defended the program by asserting it cannot be used on domestic targets without a warrant, that it has helped to prevent acts of terrorism, and that it receives independent oversight from the federal government's executive, judicial and legislative branches. On June 19, 2013, U.S. President Barack Obama, during a visit to Germany, stated that the NSA's data gathering practices constitute "a circumscribed, narrow system directed at us being able to protect our people"...
Shortly after publication of the reports by The Guardian and The Washington Post, the United States Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, on June 7 released a statement confirming that for nearly six years the government of the United States had been using large Internet services companies such as Google and Facebook to collect information on foreigners outside the United States as a defense against national security threats. The statement read in part, "The Guardian and The Washington Post articles refer to collection of communications pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They contain numerous inaccuracies." He went on to say, "Section 702 is a provision of FISA that is designed to facilitate the acquisition of foreign intelligence information concerning non-U.S. persons located outside the United States. It cannot be used to intentionally target any U.S. citizen, any other U.S. person, or anyone located within the United States." Clapper concluded his statement by stating, "The unauthorized disclosure of information about this important and entirely legal program is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans." On March 12, 2013, Clapper had told the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that the NSA does "not wittingly" collect any type of data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans. Clapper later admitted the statement was false.
Some 850,000 NSA employees and U.S. private contractors with top secret clearance have access to GCHQ databases and as of May last year, at least 750 analysts from the U.K. and NSA were tasked specifically with sifting through the data, using more than 70,000 search terms related to security, terrorist activity and organized crime. Search terms focus on subjects, phone numbers and email addresses of interest. The tapping was conducted in cooperation with commercial companies that own and operate the cables, the paper noted.
Originally posted by Starwise
reply to post by Bicent76
I don't think people are shrugging it off...I just think people are numb! Too much infiltrating the mind while trying to raise kids, pay your bills and work 40 hrs a week. Its like a having PTSD. Sometimes the only coping mechanism is to retreat or be in shock. That is what I think many people are in...SHOCK.
Originally posted by Bicent76
Originally posted by Starwise
reply to post by Bicent76
I don't think people are shrugging it off...I just think people are numb! Too much infiltrating the mind while trying to raise kids, pay your bills and work 40 hrs a week. Its like a having PTSD. Sometimes the only coping mechanism is to retreat or be in shock. That is what I think many people are in...SHOCK.
I typically do not respond to direct quotes much these days, don't like to derail, or act trollish, but Let me make myself clear.. When people hear the news and the news anchor presents a report the government is tapping their phones, monitoring their internet actions, digesting this information to present a minority report type of world in the near future and the people have no response to it, because if all the people had a response it would be a much bigger story then it is now.. Is not shock, numb yea perhaps or docile yet its shrugged off, if your trying to say the population cannot process this information and is just in shock, and its a handicap then the Government is allot smarter then all of us... However you want to interpret this story, their does not appear to be any outcry from the people and it is looking pretty damn polarized around here, and as I said it not going to take much more to speed the polarization up...
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by sonnny1
What scares me more is the profiling aspect that I don't see many people latching onto yet. These expansive, highly evolved, and detailed data sets can be used to profile us down to minutia.
The technology for doing that is in all likelihood still new enough to be in its infancy... but the implications are unfathomably profound. To be able to sit down at a computer, type in a name... and then get a detailed psych analysis complete with relevant predictive modelling attribution?
This type of manipulation and analysis of individuals is pretty ancient - but it used to be extremely labor intensive and time consuming... a team of experts were required to build these sorts of profiles. Now it is entirely probable that it's being done wholesale.... with results for just about any of us available on demand.
This power is every bit as profound, sociologically speaking as was centralized population groups, the advent of governance, the development of law, religion... It's the wheel remade - and the ways it can be used and abused are desperately frightening.
IE at this point being "watched" is the least of our worries... being categorized and predicted? THOSE are the implications that I think the masses have yet to understand. I think the general populace shrugs and says "I'm a good person. I pay taxes and obey the law... let them watch." without understanding that we've crossed the Rubicon into an entirely new world here.
Originally posted by Hefficide
IE at this point being "watched" is the least of our worries... being categorized and predicted? THOSE are the implications that I think the masses have yet to understand. I think the general populace shrugs and says "I'm a good person. I pay taxes and obey the law... let them watch." without understanding that we've crossed the Rubicon into an entirely new world here.