It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aboutface
QUESTION: How long does it take to apply manual brakes on 11 wagons, and is the person doing this remunerated for the time it takes to do this? I read that it can take up to 2 hours so would like a reply from an experienced person. TIA
edit on 16-7-2013 by aboutface because: (no reason given)
reply to post by Montana
Insight: Canadian train disaster a dark turn for rail veteran
Karl Plume, P.J. Huffstutter and Ernest Scheyder 3 hours ago
Burkhardt, who is about to turn 75, stands by MMA's safety record and noted the company had no serious derailments before Lac-Megantic. "I have never been involved with anything remotely approaching this in my whole life," he said.
A blinding flash of orange light jarred Weyauwega residents awake before dawn on March 4, 1996. An 81-car freight train had been barreling toward the farm town in central Wisconsin when it jumped a broken rail. The train's propane and petroleum cargo had caught fire and exploded. Gerald Poltrock II, a rookie local police officer, thought it was a prank when the dispatcher called to say the city "blew up."
The company reported more accidents than 93 percent of the 288 small rail lines (with fewer than 400,000 employee hours per year) that had accidents in that period.
"These are terrible things to occur, events I take very seriously and personally," Burkhardt said. "I have worked diligently to improve safety performance, and when one fails it is a personal failure."
(Rail World is an investment and management company that Burkhardt formed after leaving Wisconsin Central in 1999.)
Weeks later, the new MMA management cut salaries by 25 percent, reduced payroll from 350 to about 275, and shelved plans to spend $20 million on infrastructure improvements.
In February 1997, following the accident, Wisconsin Central agreed to federal safety inspection directives to roll out widespread improvements to its tracks, railroad cars and locomotives. For example, it agreed to spend at least 30 percent more on track improvements. The company also underwrote repair costs to the town, voluntarily paid Weyauwega residents $50 for each day they were dislocated, and donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to non-profit groups in the area. More than 20 families and several businesses sued the company, which settled for an undisclosed sum. Wisconsin Central estimated the total cost of the derailment at around $28 million, according to regulatory filings.
Originally posted by Beartracker16
One thing I have noticed about this whole affair is that no one has questioned the maintenance records of the rail cars.
This is apparently an company that has been making cut backs. I wonder if they cut corners on maintenance.
Originally posted by donlashway
reply to post by Montana
Insight: Canadian train disaster a dark turn for rail veteran
Karl Plume, P.J. Huffstutter and Ernest Scheyder 3 hours ago
Some information on Edward A. Burkhardt owner of rail line.
reuters/ yahoo
Burkhardt, who is about to turn 75, stands by MMA's safety record and noted the company had no serious derailments before Lac-Megantic. "I have never been involved with anything remotely approaching this in my whole life," he said.
A blinding flash of orange light jarred Weyauwega residents awake before dawn on March 4, 1996. An 81-car freight train had been barreling toward the farm town in central Wisconsin when it jumped a broken rail. The train's propane and petroleum cargo had caught fire and exploded. Gerald Poltrock II, a rookie local police officer, thought it was a prank when the dispatcher called to say the city "blew up."
The company reported more accidents than 93 percent of the 288 small rail lines (with fewer than 400,000 employee hours per year) that had accidents in that period.
"These are terrible things to occur, events I take very seriously and personally," Burkhardt said. "I have worked diligently to improve safety performance, and when one fails it is a personal failure."
So what do I think; trains are big and possibly dangerous, should we let them be operated as some game of how low can you go in operating cost? Or should there be minimum requirements to doing business like must other areas of business?
(Rail World is an investment and management company that Burkhardt formed after leaving Wisconsin Central in 1999.)
Weeks later, the new MMA management cut salaries by 25 percent, reduced payroll from 350 to about 275, and shelved plans to spend $20 million on infrastructure improvements.
Of coarse I quoted lines that back my thoughts, read the whole article. Back when I was looking at his company think I saw less than 1 million total revenue per year.
In February 1997, following the accident, Wisconsin Central agreed to federal safety inspection directives to roll out widespread improvements to its tracks, railroad cars and locomotives. For example, it agreed to spend at least 30 percent more on track improvements. The company also underwrote repair costs to the town, voluntarily paid Weyauwega residents $50 for each day they were dislocated, and donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to non-profit groups in the area. More than 20 families and several businesses sued the company, which settled for an undisclosed sum. Wisconsin Central estimated the total cost of the derailment at around $28 million, according to regulatory filings.
The transport committee held an emergency meeting Tuesday to talk about rail regulations in general, and how to improve them.
New Democrat MP Olivia Chow, who sits on the committee, says she hopes MPs can at least find out why the federal government did not enact previously recommended regulations designed to improve rail safety.
(OP note: The recommendations were apparently made several times before and ignored. The Transportation has been inactive for a while. The Harper government has made no secret of how it despises committees.)
Following the disaster, the federal Transportation Safety Board — which is still investigating — asked for changes in regulations governing rail traffic. Transport Canada responded Tuesday with the directives.
Transport Canada has issued an emergency directive requiring at least two crew members to work trains that transport dangerous goods.
It also says no locomotive attached to one or more loaded tank cars transporting dangerous goods can be left unattended on a main track.
In addition, the department is giving rail operators five days to ensure that all unattended locomotives on a main track or sidings be protected from unauthorized entry into the cab.