It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A groundbreaking new study [1] shows that pigs were harmed by the consumption of feed containing genetically modified (GM) crops.
GM-fed females had on average a 25% heavier uterus than non-GM-fed females, a possible indicator of disease that requires further investigation. Also, the level of severe inflammation in stomachs was markedly higher in pigs fed on the GM diet. The research results were striking and statistically significant.
Lead researcher Dr. Judy Carman, adjunct associate professor at Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia,[2] said: “Our findings are noteworthy for several reasons. First, we found these results in real on-farm conditions, not in a laboratory, but with the added benefit of strict scientific controls that are not normally present on farms.
“Second, we used pigs. Pigs with these health problems end up in our food supply. We eat them.
Originally posted by fluff007
Lead researcher Dr. Judy Carman, adjunct associate professor at Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia,[2] said: “Our findings are noteworthy for several reasons. First, we found these results in real on-farm conditions, not in a laboratory, but with the added benefit of strict scientific controls that are not normally present on farms.
“Second, we used pigs. Pigs with these health problems end up in our food supply. We eat them.
there should be no phenotypical variation between the GM and non-GM varieties used in this study that could influence the outcomes measured in this study.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Soy research is complicated because there’s considerable variation in isoflavone exposure among people classified as soy consumers. Agronomic factors (such as the soybean cultivar and the environmental conditions under which the crop grew) affect a food’s isoflavone profile, as does the way a soy food is processed.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest
Plus, little harm seemed to have been done to the pigs. The pictures definitely exaggerate the effects. They took the worst picture and compared it to the normal picture. Are any of you experts in this field, who can say what those pictures really mean? I thought not.
I still don't see any conclusive evidence here that GM foods harm humans.
Why science on a farm? Couldn't they get the results they wanted in a controlled environment in a laboratory? I don't know about any of this stuff, except it stinks like corn modified with fish genes.
we found these results in real on-farm conditions, not in a laboratory, but with the added benefit of strict scientific controls that are not normally present on farms.
If these findings are false, and if it is a deliberate attempt to convince the public of a lie, then I want those people to go to prison. I'm sick of all the lies. On the other hand, if companies working on GM foods know about this and are saying nothing, I want the heads of those companies to roll!