It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The accused in a chocolate price-fixing case could face a bitter fate if convicted -- millions of dollars in fines for the companies and potential jail time for the individuals.
Canada's Competition Bureau said Thursday it is laying criminal charges against Nestle Canada Inc., Mars Canada Inc. and ITWAL Ltd., a network of independent wholesale distributors.
Also charged are former Nestle Canada president Robert Leonidas; Sandra Martinez, former president of confectionery for Nestle Canada; and David Glenn Stevens, president and chief executive of ITWAL.
The companies and individuals are accused of conspiracy under the Competition Act.
In separate statements, both Nestle and Mars said they intend to "vigorously defend" themselves against the charges. Both said the allegations date back to 2007 and earlier.
A statement from ITWAL was not immediately available.
Hershey Canada Ltd. said it has reached a settlement with the Competition Bureau that will see it plead guilty to one count of price-fixing, which is subject to court approval.
Read more: www.cp24.com...
The bureau found out about the alleged scheme through its immunity program, under which the first party to disclose an offence or provide evidence may receive immunity, provided it fully co-operates.
Subsequent parties that help out in an investigation may receive lenient treatment, as Hershey did in this case.
Read more: www.cp24.com...
The Competition Act's current conspiracy provision could mean a $25-million fine and/or imprisonment of up to 14 years.
But since the price-fixing took place before tougher rules were introduced in 2010 and came into effect in 2012, the accused in this case face a fine of up to $10 million and/or a prison term of up to five years.
Under the new rules, the Competition Bureau won't have to prove anti-competitive behaviour had an "undue economic effect on the market."
But since the chocolate price fixing took place in 2007, the bureau's case must pass that test. That makes it more complicated to prove the accused broke the law.
Read more: www.cp24.com...
Originally posted by SubTruth
reply to post by boncho
I used to have a buddy I would argue with about price fixing being global in nature and across all industries. He was a business major and know it all. He would say over and over again demand determines price.
Gotta love brainwashed know it all's. From gas to chocolate the fix is in people. Why have price wars when they can band together and fix the prices.