It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
as you described with the muzzles , are they soft muzzles?
Originally posted by onequestion
We put the dog in the back yard on a chain with a collar that has spikes in it that tightens as he pulls. He somehow escapes his collar and runs around the neighborhood.
Originally posted by onequestion
This isn't the first time hes gotten loose.
Originally posted by onequestion
He usually just runs around the neighborhood untill one of our neighbors brings him back.
Originally posted by onequestion
Today in the mail we recieved a $1800 fine from the local magistrates office that we now have to pay.
Originally posted by onequestion
Can you believe that? They are fining us $1800 dollars after killing our dog. I think the rottweiler is a more aggressive breed and i think the dog attacked my dog. I also think the police officer was quick to shoot. I just can't believe it.
Originally posted by Unity_99
IAnd people should stop expecting a perfect tailored, manicured, yuppy neighborhood. I like the grass long, and the dogs in it. I walk barefoot and want to see clothes drying outside. I don't respect sterile control mindsets but freedom and happiness, mistakes and all.
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
While I'm sad for your dog's undignified ending, I can't understand people who just leave their dogs alone outside and tied up. If it's nice enough for the dog to be outside, it should be being attended to by a responsible person at all times, especially so if you can't guarantee it not being able to get off your property if it somehow slips its leash. As for rottweilers being the more vicious breed, that is nonsense - viciousness is something an owner allows to develop, not something inherent in a particular breed.
Originally posted by Unity_99
If you have to muzzle a dog, please chose to put more love into him/her and give him/her a more suitable environoment. That is horrible. Mother Earth is not impressed by violations of nature. Love and trust should not be betrayed.
And people should stop expecting a perfect tailored, manicured, yuppy neighborhood. I like the grass long, and the dogs in it. I walk barefoot and want to see clothes drying outside. I don't respect sterile control mindsets but freedom and happiness, mistakes and all.
We were so happy to take the plastic cone off our cat's neck yesterday. She was suffering horribly with that on.
Originally posted by jheherrin
Originally posted by Unity_99
IAnd people should stop expecting a perfect tailored, manicured, yuppy neighborhood. I like the grass long, and the dogs in it. I walk barefoot and want to see clothes drying outside. I don't respect sterile control mindsets but freedom and happiness, mistakes and all.
Do you also run nakid thru fields of flowers as well? Serious question.
Anyway, I was a bit harsh on the OP, but I didn't see them take any responsibility for what happened so it's hard for me to feel pity for someone in that situation. It is a sad story though, and I hope they learned a lesson from it. Animals aren't pets. If you don't have the resources to properly take care of an animal, you shouldn't have one... it doesn't matter if your eighty and just want companionship, or you just want a 'pet' for your children. It's selfish. And as others have pointed out... many, many people who buy dogs/cats/animals don't even understand the behavior of their 'pet', so when it does something, like bites the pizza delivery driver, they inevitably say something stupid like "she's never done that before!". Or they spank their dogs for chewing furniture when noone is home, or for pooping on the floor... both of which is asinine, and is abuse as far as I'm concerned, because so many don't understand their behavior. /rantedit on 7-6-2013 by jheherrin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by Unity_99
Both dogs are very territorial so it was inevitable. We actually took really good care of him, there is 4 adults living in my house so he got walked constantly and fed properly and pretty much anything he wanted.
Originally posted by Hollie
I am sure every chicken, sheep, and goat owner will agree with this. NOT!
Originally posted by RothchildRancor
I don't believe in keeping a dog outside by itself.
That in itself is the practice of a cruel owner.
It seems to me that some think letting your dog out on a tie out is cruel.
Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by kdyam
So you live in a ghetto neighborhood where people breed mean rottweilers but you own a sugar plum pacifist of a pitbull? That sounds like total B.S.
Who said ghetto neighborhood? I live in a city, albeit a very colorful city but its not a ghetto, yet.
Originally posted by Phage
Leaving unattended dogs tied up is a terrible practice.
I have known pitbulls with wonderful temperaments and some with very unwonderful temperaments. The same applies to many breed (Except golden retrievers, of course. All wonderful.). But the "problem" with bulls is that their jaws are so damned powerful. It just takes one bite.
edit on 6/6/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kdyam
Originally posted by Hollie
I am sure every chicken, sheep, and goat owner will agree with this. NOT!
Originally posted by RothchildRancor
I don't believe in keeping a dog outside by itself.
That in itself is the practice of a cruel owner.
WTF? Really? You are comparing chicken sheep and goats to a pitbull. or dogs in general? Dogs regularly kill all of the animals you mentioned. How is a chicken, sheep or goat comparable to this circumstance. Have fun introducing your 30 cats to your farm animals,
I don't believe in keeping a dog outside by itself. That in itself is the practice of a cruel owner.