It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One thing you can count on is that Americans will likely have their guns for some time to come. I would also bet that the American military and private militias alike would assist Canada in the event of an invasion.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
I guess the bigger question is which countries have the equipment to move hundreds of thousands of troops and tanks to the US? Can only be done by Sea or Air and thats going to be a LOT of naval transport equipment as well as planes that are the equivalent to the US C-130 cargo transport plane. A LOT of those would be needed as well. It would sure be tough for the US not to see any of that coming. Would be akin to shooting ducks on a pond or fish in a barrel.
And as stated earlier, the US population is the most hevaily armed in the world. If the US thought it was tough fighting an insurgency battle in little ole Iraq, then imagine what an invading army would face in the US especially in places like say south central LA or any of our heavily, heavily armed inner cities? Imagine what the convoys would face out in the country-side as they trek through the land. The rifle population in the southern US is ridiculous. Instead of shooting deer from 300 yards out, the rednecks will be picking off troops.
Nah...invading the US is just a bad, bad idea.edit on 2-6-2013 by princeofpeace because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RAY1990
Originally posted by princeofpeace
I guess the bigger question is which countries have the equipment to move hundreds of thousands of troops and tanks to the US? Can only be done by Sea or Air and thats going to be a LOT of naval transport equipment as well as planes that are the equivalent to the US C-130 cargo transport plane. A LOT of those would be needed as well. It would sure be tough for the US not to see any of that coming. Would be akin to shooting ducks on a pond or fish in a barrel.
And as stated earlier, the US population is the most hevaily armed in the world. If the US thought it was tough fighting an insurgency battle in little ole Iraq, then imagine what an invading army would face in the US especially in places like say south central LA or any of our heavily, heavily armed inner cities? Imagine what the convoys would face out in the country-side as they trek through the land. The rifle population in the southern US is ridiculous. Instead of shooting deer from 300 yards out, the rednecks will be picking off troops.
Nah...invading the US is just a bad, bad idea.edit on 2-6-2013 by princeofpeace because: (no reason given)
Well I would like to think if suck an attack would happen it would be unorthadox in every sense of the word, Russia maintains an ancient airforce as well as a modern one just look at how they played with British airspace 3 years ago
www.dailymail.co.uk...
news.bbc.co.uk...
I personally seen these as little subtle reminders at the time, maybe like the Chinese submarine was when it popped up in training just off the US Pacific coast.
A we are here situation... and though it seems silly you know we are a real potential threat.edit on 2-6-2013 by RAY1990 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Typical ATS Bull#. The same folks who gloat how the US couldnt defeat an insurgency army in Iraq are now talking about how the US can be invaded and defeated??? Whatever. The insurgency battle fought in Iraq is NOTHING compared to what an invading army would face in the US. And we arent even talking troops here, im talking citizens!!
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
1. How many ships filled with men and supplies does a country need to stage a credible invasion of the united states?
2. How long would it take to build those ships?
3. How long would it take to load and supply them in a deepwater port?
4. How long is the journey from this hypothetical staging area(s)?
5. How do satellites, recon flights, and civilian planes and ships miss a traverse of this size over this much time?
6. How do they coordinate and communicate with one another?
7. How do they keep their supply lines open?
Answer 5 out of 7 of these questions and then -- maybe -- we can discuss a hypothetical of this nature beyond fantasy role-playing games, alien invasions, and stargates.edit on 1-6-2013 by 0zzymand0s because: (no reason given)
reply to post by princeofpeace
Thats fine that Russia "played with" the Uk and that a Chinese sub "popped up". That has nothing to do with the astronomical feat of trasporting hundreds of thousands of troops and hardware thousands of miles. The events you mentioned arent even relevant in the slightest.
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by 0zzymand0s
Thank you for your reply. Personally I would never underestimate an enemy...The United States certainly has the most technologically advanced military in the world, but technology can be an Achilles heal. Why do you think the Chinesse are spending so much on cyber warfare. How strong would the U.S be if the satalites where blown out the sky for example. How much chaos would ensue if electricity was turned off.. I do not think it would take long before people where killing each other in the streets.. A gun behind everyblade is not much of a defense from bombs dropping from the sky or tanks...
Hopefully such an event never happens though..
It has nothing to do with underestimating the enemy and is all about the unrealistic tactics and logistics needed to launch a successful ground based invasion of the mainland US.