It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by ignorant_ape
The moon in ancient earth history used to be much closer to the earth, the powerful tidal forces of which would have helped to drive the process of evolution by causing salt water to pool far inland breaking up molecular recombinations, but it's only now, when there are self aware sentient observers that the apparent visible circumference of the moon is identical to that of the sun, where at full moon it is a perfect reflection, and also during total eclipse, both solar, with the circumference of the moon blotting out the sun and lunar, with the shadow of the earth circumferencing the moon. The moon is also responsible for dynamic equilibrium balancing of the earth's wobble and tilt responsible for the seasons and the cycle of life, including the process of human fertilization and gestation. In short the moon-earth-sun relationship is the cause of life on earth as we enjoy it today, including the presence of liquid water over 90% of the earth's surface.
The full moon also mimics the sun, by rising at night, and by chasing the sun on a monthly basis such that at opposite winter/summer solstices the full moon rises at a degree equidistant to due north of that of the rising sun, and yet the moon orbits the earth and the earth, the sun.
Such things are only significant however, to an earth-based, sentient observer. As you yourself said
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
eclipses just happen - they serve no actual emperical benefit to any terestrial organism
The only counter argument is fluke/coincidence, and yet any investigative study will show that the earth-moon-sun relationship is perfectly configured in favor of life.
There's a lot more data than this too some of which reveals that something very unusual took place during the formation of the earth whereby presently held theories of moon formation must be discarded ie: the double-whack theory by unknown rogue planetoid for example.
The main point of this little thesis, aside from the Jesus bit with his use of a lunar eclipse as some sort of spiritual-cosmic theodolite (lens), resides in our ability to look at effects from first causes and recognize intelligent design.
You can argue coincidence or random happenstance if you like, but it's a rather poor argument in the face of all the evidence and data to the contrary which points to a comic evolutionary process intentionally directed towards life, including life as we know it, and even human life. And if by design then it was by anticipation from the very beginning of time and space with the present outcome and effect enfolded in the originating cause, and that's not only intelligent, but what I call super-intelligent or infinitely intelligent.
But wait there's more..
In the diagram above, the big triangle is the same proportion and angle of the Great Pyramid, with its base angles at 51 degrees 51 minutes. If you bisect this triangle and assign a value of 1 to each base, then the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) equals phi (1.618..) and the perpendicular side equals the square root of phi. And that’s not all. A circle is drawn with it’s centre and diameter the same as the base of the large triangle. This represents the circumference of the earth. A square is then drawn to touch the outside of the earth circle. A second circle is then drawn around the first one, with its circumference equal to the perimeter of the square. (The squaring of the circle.)
This new circle will actually pass exactly through the apex of the pyramid. And now the “wow”: A circle drawn with its centre at the apex of the pyramid and its radius just long enough to touch the earth circle, will have the circumference of the moon! Neat, huh! And the small triangle formed by the moon and the earth square will be a perfect 345 triangle
Ref: geometry.wholesomebalance.com...
Ref 2: nexusilluminati.blogspot.ca...
Ref 3: Strange Moon Facts
So all of you are telling me that 40 000 people (very low estimate) used advanced tools to build pyramids and all those tools disappeared? Not one was buried somewhere in the sand? No one has yet to explain any theory on how the extraordinary properties are constructed, all theories involving "humans built it" ends with "unlikely, no scientific proof" In other words, we don't know how we built it. Simple as that.
did you even do research?
Do people need to be spoon fed the links to the research for them to find the facts themselves?
Did you even read that same paragraph where I listed all the facts about the pyramid?
Regarding the post about ancients assisting in construction, I think that is more likely than simply humans sitting around and figuring out properties of Earth and putting it on a Pyramid with electrical signals.
Seriously, stop arguing with me with links that contradict your point.
Originally posted by Turkenstein
Originally posted by IMSAM
The pyramids were made by humans,yep human hands
Unless you want us to believe that visitors from outer space came in their mighty machines here and all they managed to do was the pyramids.
I would have used marble,or diamond
Then you would not have the electrical properties that the pyramid does now.
Originally posted by brocket99
reply to post by draknoir2
draknoir: I'm not sure why you ask questions when you already have all the answers. You replied in less time then it would have taken to watch the video, and while I know pyramid power was a fad in the 70's, Munck speaks to what you asked about in the previous post.
His ideas and concepts of geo-mathematics bring possibilities to how the Egyptian Pyramids could have been easily made, as well as the many OTHER pyramids of grand scale around the globe.
At least those possibilities make more sense then primitive tools and slave labor over 10-80 years.
Brought back grade school memories of trying to preserve a piece of fruit under a pyramid dome.
Here David Childress proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the blocks are not perfectly square while at the same time exclaiming that they are square. It's some koind of ancient alien mind game.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by peashooter
reply to post by bottleslingguy
This was my point, every single block has to be precise like lego pieces, just this fact blew my mind away. If a couple blocks were a couple centimeters off, it will throw off the accuracy of the entire structure.
So this is the basis of your erroneous belief, then.
Sorry, but not a single block is precisely fitted. 99% of the Great Pyramid is slapped together without regard for fit.
The AE's didn't even bother to level the courses of stone, correcting their level every tenth or fifteenth course.
Huge voids exist behind the stone, in which we can see dumped gtobs of mortar, sand and rock debris.
You really ought to learn a little about the structure before pronouncing it perfect.
Harte
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Here David Childress proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the blocks are not perfectly square while at the same time exclaiming that they are square. It's some koind of ancient alien mind game.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Here David Childress proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the blocks are not perfectly square while at the same time exclaiming that they are square. It's some koind of ancient alien mind game.