It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Report (FBI UCR) counts four categories of crime as violent crimes: murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.[13] It should be noted that there are two methods of recording crime in the US. These do not look at exactly the same crimes. The UCR measures crimes reported to police, and classes violent crime as above. The NCVS measures crimes reported by households surveyed by the United States Census Bureau, and looks at assault, rape, and robbery. The UCR figures are those quoted for, "violent crime" rates.
Originally posted by antar
It is not going to get easier but I suspect about the time 99% of Americans are on FS, the system of welfare will crash if it is not already in the works.
Originally posted by kingofmd
Originally posted by UNIT76
well, food and nutrition, water.. basic human rights.. take these away from someone and how do you expect them to turn out?
i think this is just another example of how the new society is going to squeeze all the 'undesirables' out
..never mind all those psychopaths in washington with the drone programs, etc..
Poor criminals. They just may have to go to work if they want to eat.
yeah, what was i just saying about 'washington'edit on 25-5-2013 by UNIT76 because: hindsight is 20/20
It is sad to see that so many have been conditioned into believing that these poor people are sub human and incapable of providing for themselves. There are plenty of humans that have not been given handouts, and guess what... they manage to survive. Do you know why you aren't allowed to feed the animals in national parks? The animals quit fending for themselves and become aggressive towards humans when they do not get what they want. See any connection between that and the persons living off of the work of others?
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
So they are going to cut off basic food assistance, among already desperate people, to the MOST violent among the desperate. ....and who thought this was a good idea??
Originally posted by antar
Although I agree with this, and furthermore think that all welfare recipients should be drug tested with a no tolerance policy for life, it will probably end up not passing.
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by antar
Although I agree with this, and furthermore think that all welfare recipients should be drug tested with a no tolerance policy for life, it will probably end up not passing.
And what of their children? Should they starve because their sorry ass mom or dad failed a drug test?
Originally posted by jiggerj
Couldn't agree more. On top of that, I'd like to know if the time spent on this Bill was a waste of time. How many people convicted of such crimes sought food stamps? Here we have a national deficit of $16,741,876,472,844.22, and it is growing by $2.85 billion per day. So getting violent offenders off food stamps cuts government spending by what? $2,000 a day? Woohoo.
How about they devote some time to working out how to get our military out of the Middle East. Now THAT would cut serious spending.
Originally posted by blivey
reply to post by groingrinder
And if the father refuses? He may already be paying child support which may not be enough to help with groceries for a whole month. Why should children go hungry if their parents have hit hard times, and daddy can't pay up. There is a sound reason for the SNAP program. If you aren't worried about where your next meal is coming from, you can focus on getting yourself into a better financial situation,and a child should be able to focus at school, not be distracted all day by an empty tummy. The program just needs to address situations where the benefits are not being used for their intended purpose.edit on 5/25/2013 by blivey because: foggy morning brain
Originally posted by Quauhtli
reply to post by Bone75
Oh, don't get me started with that BS. There is no reason to bring someones piss into the equation. These people are the forgotten elements of our cities and culture. We have designed the place without them in mind, and then we go and start saying that the marginal support that we afford them is now a privilege that gets revoked if they turn to the only thing that might pay the bills or afford them a small bit of comfort~ drugs
People on the 'drug test train' should find themselves in the same situations that those on the the south side have to face every day.