PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job

Originally posted by MuzzleBreak
Cooper's best, most timely prediction, made 2.5 months before 9/11.

...and it was wrong! If that was his best, I'd hate to see his worst.

If the prediction had been accurate, and if the government had been seriously concerned about its implications, wouldn't it have made better sense to kill him before it came true? But no, you want us to believe they shot him afterwards... why exactly?

You obviously haven't thought this through.

He was shot by LEOs less than 2 months after 9/11.

...and let's remember why: he was charged with tax evasion, went on the run, became a violent felon, and died in a gunfight with LEOs after shooting one of them in the head:

In July 1998 he was charged with tax evasion and an arrest warrant was issued but not executed, resulting in his being named a "major fugitive" by the US Marshals Service in 2000.[6]

On November 5, 2001 Apache County sheriff's deputies attempted to arrest Cooper at his Eagar, Arizona home on charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and endangerment stemming from earlier disputes with local residents.

After an exchange of gunfire during which Cooper shot one of the deputies in the head, Cooper was fatally shot.

Federal authorities reported that Cooper had spent years trying to avoid capture on the 1998 tax evasion arrest warrant, and according to a spokesman for the U.S. Marshals Service, he had vowed that "he would not be taken alive".

(Source).

Cooper was a pathetic little bastard; mere criminal scum.

Just to sidetrack this thread a little, with all the recent disclosures about eavesdropping etc by the powers that be, would not this surveillance have picked this operation up, after all it was a well planned and took some time to organise.

Which leads one to wonder, is the surveillance as good as suggested?

Has it been going on as long as suspected?

Are those involved really competent in analysing the information?

Finally, if they did not know about this prior to it happening, with all this technology they say they have, then does it not prove that there was no prior intelligence and that it had to be an inside job?

reply to post by dowot

Which leads one to wonder, is the surveillance as good as suggested?

Has it been going on as long as suspected?

Are those involved really competent in analysing the information?

Precisely!
12 years and no one spills the beans on a perfect coverup?
All the players did their jobs perfectly?
No one has gotten pissed at their boss and dropped a document to Wikileaks?

And yet they are crucifying Clinton because they couldn't get help to Lybia?

I'm sorry but our government isn't smart enough to pull off something as big as 911 and not get caught.

Anyone starting a thread with a title beginning with "PROOF" needs to be slapped with a wet noodle. I dont care if its dealing with 9/11 or a dog pooping in their back yard.

Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by hellobruce

 

So when are you going to show us how sagging trusses can pull in columns.

You make comments on the most irrelevant points, and think you're winning the 911 debate?

You can debunk every single claim in existence, but unless you can prove sagging trusses can pull in columns the NIST report will still be in question.

Why can't you all focus on what's important?

NIST highlight that throughout that day there were at least 10 fire’s burning inside WTC-7 with out of control fires raging on floors 7-9 and 11-13. The heat from these fires caused the steel beams supporting these floors to sag as a result of fire induced thermal expansion. Due to the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between steel and concrete the connections holding floor 13 to column 79 failed resulting in the collapse of floor 13 when a girder connecting column 44 to 79 failed on the 13th floor. The collapse of floor 13 caused a progressive collapse of the floors below it on until they reached the reinforced floor 5. However this action left column 79 (one of the 3 large support columns for the eastern portion of the building) without any lateral support cause it to buckle and then fail. The Failure of column 79 resulted in an upwards progression of collapse of the floors it was supporting which caused the collapse of the East Penthouse. This put additional strain on the 2 remaining supporting interior columns, 80 and 81 which under the redistributed weight coupled with the debris and effects of fire also buckled causing the first and second transfer trusses to also fail. This redistributed the load of the building on to columns 58-78 and now the entire weight of the building was being supported by these interior columns which were insufficient (hence the need for the transfer trusses in the first place), and as such they also began to buckle and fail. The columns began to fail form east to west this caused a progressive collapse of the core support of the building and the entire interior of the building collapsed. Eventually the building essentially became hollow and the exterior support columns also failed and the building fell straight down. There was very little resistance because the interior of the building had already collapsed.

Originally posted by samkent

I'm sorry but our government isn't smart enough to pull off something as big as 911 and not get caught.