It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NothingMakesSense
I have noticed that in the past 4 or so months that the media has stopped covering the constant car bombings, terrorist attacks, etc in Iraq. This would seem understandable if our media was really unbiased, but it's not. The media rabidly hates Bush. Coverage of the constant terror in Iraq would be damaging to Bush, so why isn't the media covering it?
This seems inconsistent with thier biases.
Any ideas?
Originally posted by edsinger
Maybe the frequency has diminished? But in reality I think they have finally realized that the publicity only encourages more attacks and therefore make the press somewhat accomplices to terror.
Article 14
Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Maybe the frequency has diminished? But in reality I think they have finally realized that the publicity only encourages more attacks and therefore make the press somewhat accomplices to terror.