Details of Alleged Photographic Evidence Re Roswell UFO Crash Leaked To The Public!

reply to post by Frank Warren


Did you see that Pic,.. . ? .. It looks like it is Photoshoped.

As for the story. All I can think to say is. . .. . .. .

"Pictures Or It Didn't Happen".

I will Not hold my breath over this.

reply to post by ShadellacZumbrum


Sheesh did you even bother to read???????????????


ILLUSTRATION wake up

Greetings Mr Warren,

I am somewhat confused here. The title of the thread says " Details of Alleged Photographic Evidence Re Roswell UFO Crash Leaked To The Public! .

If there is an " alleged " photograph leaked to the public then 1] where is the alleged photograph and 2] which part of humanity was it leaked to?

I really don't understand why someone [yourself] would spread what appears to be disinformation?

Be safe be well and please find/post the " alleged " picture

Spiro

reply to post by Spiro


For goodness sake where is the disinformation !

The clue is in the title, details of - alleged photo - re Roswell / details of which leaked to the public.

Wow...people please read...try it once & you will understand the thread a lot better. Just admit you didn't read it instead of trying to come up with excuse after excuse...you're just making yourself look much worse.

These "alleged" pictures will never surface.

Even if they did surface, they wouldn't be of much use anyway without samples of the material to analyze.

This thread belongs in the Hoax forum.

So presumably, this is the geological group, including an older teacher, a couple of girls and boy students, who are described in the interview with the "6 yo Boy" who is now an old man, that initially found the crash site with the 1 live alien and 2 dead aliens, sheltering under the crashed craft on the escarpment, oreo or something or other?
I cant seem to find that interview atm, but Im sure its somewhere in ATS.
This crash site, its not the Mac Brazell ranch crash site, but the one several miles away.

Having viewed that interview it is quite interesting....apparently about the 6 yearold boy, his older brother, his dad and uncle at the crash site first....Then the geological group turning up later, either when all the military are there or just before.

If this new information is verified, then it certainly links the story.
I think the "6yo boy" said his uncle left a letter to him when he (the uncle) died in the late 60s, coroborating all the facts and the incident......I wonder if that letter has been presented to UFO researchers?

Something happened that night/day, no doubt.

Amazing that geologist were even allowed to dig around the area.
2nd

Oh so the geologist showed up around the time of the crash, something had me thinking that the geologist showed up years later. Ok

What happened (or didnt happen) at Roswell is irrelevant in todays UFO world.
The event has been thoroughly muddied by the Air force.
The Varginha Brazil Crash is documented and there are many live witnesses etc.....
The Incident in Nova Sxotia as well.....
Why do we waste time and resources digging up more disinfo about stuff thats so tainted its impossible to get the facts?
The possible scenarios with Scully, Dr Gee, et al are far too murky to be untangled now....
Its kinda like gazing up a dead horses ass if you ask me......

Mornin' Spiro,

Originally posted by Spiro
Greetings Mr Warren,

I am somewhat confused here. The title of the thread says " Details of Alleged Photographic Evidence Re Roswell UFO Crash Leaked To The Public! .

If there is an " alleged " photograph leaked to the public then 1] where is the alleged photograph and 2] which part of humanity was it leaked to?

I really don't understand why someone [yourself] would spread what appears to be disinformation?

Be safe be well and please find/post the " alleged " picture

Spiro

You correctly quoted the (post) title, then in your question below it omitted the noun "DETAILS." As it states, its the DETAILS that have been leaked via the article (technically) about how the author(s) surmise that the Aztec Incident was created in order "cover" the Roswell Incident.

Forgetting the Aztec- Roswell Mishmosh, the key points (DETAILS) in the article (IMHO) as stated are:

• New evidence ala Roswell has been uncovered.

• The evidence is apparently both physical in that it's in the form of photographs, and with (new) eyewitness(es) via the geologists who took said pics.

• The media is involved.

• The so-called Roswell Dream Team is involved.

Finally, as stated in the initial post (here) that started this thread, the article was penned by Rich Reynolds of the RRRGroup & The UFO Iconoclast(s); we published it with his permission (as always).

Not to be rude; however, to say that this is disinformation, would suggest that Reynolds is lying . . . do you know something that others don't?

Cheers,
Frank

Mornin' Chunder,

Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by Spiro

 

For goodness sake where is the disinformation !

The clue is in the title, details of - alleged photo - re Roswell / details of which leaked to the public.

Thanks for your due diligence in actually reading the article.

Cheers,
Frank

reply to post by Frank Warren


Good lord, get an editor for your website. The writing there is so badly done it's unreadable. It's like a dime store novel written by a barely literate fifth grader. And it would help your case if the entire website didn't look like a porn site but instead like something resembling actual, y'know, research.

I believe we've been visited for centuries now, I believe the governments of the world are refusing to tell us the truth of the matter (and the truth WOULD cause panic considering some of the more sordid details) but tabloid journalism on the subject only serves to enable the debunkers and ridiculers.

Originally posted by stirling
What happened (or didnt happen) at Roswell is irrelevant in todays UFO world.
The event has been thoroughly muddied by the Air force.

The UFO community is even more culpable.

Here's an interesting breakdown of the storyline evolution.

My two biggest issues with the accepted lore are the relatively recent [1980] insertion of the Alien bodies into the canon and the lack of actual hard wreckage. I heard a recent description of the "clean up" by a guy who was on the original crew, Earl Fulford [recently deceased] forming a line and picking up tiny bits of foil and paper and placing them in a pouch... consistent with the policing of a radar target debris field and not that of a hard craft crash site [go to 14:30 of the video]. This is typical of other accounts of the "wreckage". I doubt that ET is tooling around in flimsy paper, foil, balsa wood and scotch tape craft, and if they are, it's no wonder they crash.



The USAF has been BSing about it for so long at this point full disclosure [ouch! hurts to use that word] would be rejected, whatever form it takes.

Then you have tall tale tellers like Philip Corso claiming credit for reverse engineering everything from lasers and fiber optics to the integrated circuit and Kevlar.

Muddied yes, but there's plenty of blame to go around.

reply to post by IMSAM


Apparently your sarcasm meter is Flat Broke.

I did in fact read the word "Illustration" a dozen or so times before I posted that.

But still, . All that story and no pictures. .. Only a hint that there Might be pictures just to get a Hit on that damn website.

That picture doesn't even look real.

Besides - we all know the craft was obliterated into millions of pieces. Didn't any of you see that Kyle Maclachlan movie?

geesh

What the...? I know I just woke up, but... A photo that isn't the real photo? When can we see the real photo?
And how are the Aztecs involved? Are they still around? I never heard of an Aztec UFO crash. Maybe I just need to get out more...to those UFO websites...so I can figure out what the heck is going on around here...

Roswell is quite simple from the outside:

Why would the USAF try and explain Roswell four times in the course of the last few decades? They certainly don't care about public opinion, so that to me doesn't make sense unless something weird did happen. A bunch of witnesses who say the opposite of what the USAF is saying, the public discrediting of the author of the book mentioned in the OP. The original newspaper reports then being redacted and changed, the UFO reports leading up to and after the alleged incident at Roswell.

Don't get me wrong, the UFO cover up has worked so well but it all seems rather messy on the Roswell subject.

reply to post by Frank Warren

"While the provenance of that material is being sought, evidence that it derives from the 1947 Roswell area is circumstantially solid."

Sooo... there's as of yet no proof of authenticity or origin, but the circumstantial evidence is solid?


I'm glad "the rest of the story" was thus prefaced. A real time saver.

Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
Roswell is quite simple from the outside:

Why would the USAF try and explain Roswell four times in the course of the last few decades? They certainly don't care about public opinion, so that to me doesn't make sense unless something weird did happen.

I'm not saying its disinformation, but there are benefit of using disinformation to hide in plain site.

1. The outcome for UFO witnesses has not been a positive one. For decades most people kept their mouth shut when they saw something strange in fear of ridicule. That would be a good thing if you are trying to hide something from the general public when doing testing or during oh $h1t moments.

2. If people associate UFO with Alien technology versus advance military technology that is also beneficial in obscuring factual evidence from being released .

3. If people don't know what is true or false they tend to run in circles, which is always a benefit to top secret type work.

4. If foreign countries buy into the Alien visitation thing , that would be a huge benefit for covert top secret missions.

So there are benefits to keeping everyone guessing that does not relate to Alien technology, but rather human psychological traits.

My friend,

Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by Spiro

 

For goodness sake where is the disinformation !

The clue is in the title, details of - alleged photo - re Roswell / details of which leaked to the public.

Well, for goodness sake, why post a story with an illustration photo to back up a story of a story that has an alleged photo?

Why not wait for the " alleged " photo instead of misleading people with an " illustration " of an " alleged " photo.

Damn, if there is a photo then post the damn thing. Geeeez

Spiro