It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheRealTruth84
This is why we fight tooth and nail in the U.S. not to lose our 2nd amendment rights. All of a sudden the police in England are walking around with a little more firepower than you're used to seeing and you act surprised that you feel insignificant, with no ability to defend yourself or make a difference if things really do go to hell.
This is why we fight tooth and nail in the U.S. not to lose our 2nd amendment rights. All of a sudden the police in England are walking around with a little more firepower than you're used to seeing and you act surprised that you feel insignificant, with no ability to defend yourself or make a difference if things really do go to hell.
I don't agree that the police should be armed in general and would fight tooth and nail to prevent England becoming a police state.
A member of my family is armed response and was close protection at one point (prime minister and the like). I found out one day that the cars they drove were automatic and found this amusing so asked him why? His answer was very obvious but I hadn't twigged. He said "you cannot drive, shoot and change gear all at the same time".
He also told me that they will always fire two shots and that they always aim to kill. They are also trained to fire their pistols whilst still in the holsters- shooting from the hip, so to speak.
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by cody599
Armed response units have been routinely deployed by Police forces in the UK for at least the past 30 years - probably longer.
Its not a new thing, and suggesting its in response to some form of Islamic issue is completely misleading.
Upon an emergency call being received about an incident involving firearms, an Armed Response Vehicle crewed by AFOs would be dispatched. The AFOs first on scene would attempt to contain an armed subject if they are inside a building, whereas if they were in the open were an immediate threat is posed a quicker solution would be sought. If a subject is inside a building which is barricaded, AFOs would most likely assault the building as long as it does not require specialist entry or the motive of the subject is terrorist affiliated.
But since the beginning of the year there has been 9 shootings between rival Muslim gangs.
As I said the gangs are muslim. It is a fact, however religion is irrelevant the fact that we in the UK have armed police (armed response) walking the streets in broad daylight is a sad state of affairs.
Let's make this clear This is nothing about religion. It's about the realisation that armed police are even tolerated, or accepted openly in my country. Unfortunately it seems they are needed,
Originally posted by ototheb85
reply to post by cody599
I am from Milton Keynes the next city up from you! I have never seen anything like this up here! and I agree that for this kind of thing armed police are needed indeed, there fighting to protect the country they live in and them and their children get free health care.
Also I agree this lovely country has changed, move to Dorset there is less racial problems there